Guest vice president Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 HAVE YOU ALL READ THE S N F C LETTERS THEN PLEASE READ VRERY INTRESTING READ
Guest vice president Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 IT IS ON THE SNFC SITE IN RED INK
Delboy Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 A bloody disgrace once again.The SNFC are having a go at Gareth Rankin again when he in fact has served them well over the years and believe me, this is a *expletive removed* stitch up. Hes one of the most honest people that ever served on the committee and only ever wanted the integrity and tradition of the SNFC restored after the Gibson saga. I can guarantee the unrest and suspicion will continue until the whole organisation is cleansed .Anyone associated with Scott Gibson or has any dubiety about them should not be near the SNFC committee!!!!!Massive question marks are hanging over the SNFC at the moment.
Kyleakin Lofts Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 I am not a member of the SNFC, but have read this and other posts regarding this saga with interest, from the standpoint of a prospective member.At this time, I would not go near the Club with regards to applications. I am sad about this, as the SNFC was THE National. I have read the letter from the SNFC website and I am not impressed, nor has my opinion changed. Rules are being manipulated. The refusal of the meeting using a rule with a date of 1st January when the AGM took place on 10th January, I am not going to check dates stated here are correct, I have stated them to show the principle, is out of order and manipulation of the membership. The only common sense reason for such a rule is to prevent un-necessary expense in the days immediately prior to an AGM which is not the situation in this matter. If I were a member, I would not be happy with these explanations from afar, I would want to hear them "face to face".
peter2010 Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 Just read it if Mr rankin has brought the club into disrepute surely Mr McCord must be held responsible for his comments as well then
geordie1234 Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 Just read it if Mr rankin has brought the club into disrepute surely Mr McCord must be held responsible for his comments as well thenAgree
WHITTY Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 DID JOHN MCORD PUT ANY THING ON THE BHW OR ON THIS SIGHT THAT IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE SNFC IF I AM WRONG I NEVER SAW ANY THING
b.massey Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 DID JOHN MCORD PUT ANY THING ON THE BHW OR ON THIS SIGHT THAT IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE SNFC IF I AM WRONG I NEVER SAW ANY THING Might be wrong but from everything I seen this came from john writing on this sure months ago?
peter2010 Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 DID JOHN MCORD PUT ANY THING ON THE BHW OR ON THIS SIGHT THAT IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE SNFC IF I AM WRONG I NEVER SAW ANY THINGYes in a post he said "far as I can see we have people running marking stations that are not fit for the job" surely you can't make a statement like without having proof of this or something to warrant a statement like that
naedoos Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 I am not a member of the SNFC, but have read this and other posts regarding this saga with interest, from the standpoint of a prospective member.At this time, I would not go near the Club with regards to applications. I am sad about this, as the SNFC was THE National. I have read the letter from the SNFC website and I am not impressed, nor has my opinion changed. Rules are being manipulated. The refusal of the meeting using a rule with a date of 1st January when the AGM took place on 10th January, I am not going to check dates stated here are correct, I have stated them to show the principle, is out of order and manipulation of the membership. The only common sense reason for such a rule is to prevent un-necessary expense in the days immediately prior to an AGM which is not the situation in this matter. If I were a member, I would not be happy with these explanations from afar, I would want to hear them "face to face". Yeah, lets all throw the rule books away and not bother about proper procedures. We could just get all the experts on here to say what's right or what's wrong!!
tiger Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 Yeah, lets all throw the rule books away and not bother about proper procedures. We could just get all the experts on here to say what's right or what's wrong!! :emoticon-0137-clapping:
naedoos Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 Yes in a post he said "far as I can see we have people running marking stations that are not fit for the job" surely you can't make a statement like without having proof of this or something to warrant a statement like that Unsealed baskets & less than 4 at marking station is proof enough surely.....
Delboy Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 Might be wrong but from everything I seen this came from john writing on this sure months ago?
naedoos Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 Might be wrong but from everything I seen this came from john writing on this sure months ago? Think if you check the dates on the statements Brian it was all in motion before John's post
peter2010 Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 Unsealed baskets & less than 4 at marking station is proof enough surely.....For an unsealed basket it could have come off anywhere as it wasn't noticed until the race point and for not being enough members there was there not Mr rankin Mr Cullen Mr McCord and one other as Mr McCord had a witness to comments made to him while waiting or am I reading things wrong
Delboy Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 For an unsealed basket it could have come off anywhere as it wasn't noticed until the race point and for not being enough members there was there not Mr rankin Mr Cullen Mr McCord and one other as Mr McCord had a witness to comments made to him while waiting or am I reading things wrong Rab, its all bs m8, f kin cover up again.
naedoos Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 For an unsealed basket it could have come off anywhere as it wasn't noticed until the race point and for not being enough members there was there not Mr rankin Mr Cullen Mr McCord and one other as Mr McCord had a witness to comments made to him while waiting or am I reading things wrong Think you reading it wrong Rab, its all bs m8, f kin cover up again. Answers all on the website Delboy, doesn't look like a cover up to me, you wanted transparency, it's all there for everyone to see
peter2010 Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 Read it again still can't agree with you
Guest vice president Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 WELL SOME OFF YOU NEED GLASSES
peter2010 Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 WELL SOME OFF YOU NEED GLASSES No just some honest answers specky
Delboy Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 Think you reading it wrong Answers all on the website Delboy, doesn't look like a cover up to me, you wanted transparency, it's all there for everyone to see Behave yersel Dougie, the f kin national has too many question marks over it without all this sh yte. You must be getting transported by McCord to be backing this, am I right?
Eby Posted February 21, 2015 Report Posted February 21, 2015 Yeah, lets all throw the rule books away and not bother about proper procedures. We could just get all the experts on here to say what's right or what's wrong!!Yeah,let's just let this club go down the drain because the so called experts don't want open and transparency within the club,is there something they don't want out in the open? I don't know but IMO it's beginning to look that way too just about everyone in this sport,if you want a club to be proud of again get an EGM get things cleared up,it looks like only one side want things out in the open,So what is there to hide.
Recommended Posts