stevie Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 i would like to know y scott gibson is doing the pro for the s.n.f.c i dont think he sould be as joe done a good job last year
rembrant2coo Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 i would like to know y scott gibson is doing the pro for the s.n.f.c i dont think he sould be as joe done a good job last year DON,T YOU GO TO THE MEETINGS MATE MR 10%GOT HE HEAVE ONTHURSDAY NIGHT AT A SPECIAL MEETING AND IF HE IS THE PRO AM DAMNSURE HE WIDNA GET TO MY BACK DOOR WHEHHHHN HE WIDNA LET ANYBODY TO HIS
Guest Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 i would like to know y scott gibson is doing the pro for the s.n.f.c i dont think he sould be as joe done a good job last year Your within your rights to have this opinion mate but dont think many will agree with you.
Guest Gareth Rankin Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 i would like to know y scott gibson is doing the pro for the s.n.f.c i dont think he sould be as joe done a good job last year > :( > :( > Joe has been the best scribe that the Scottish National Flying club has had in the last 30 years, I was shocked and amazed that he has been replaced by someone who has threatened the SNFC for the last 7 months with litigation and for that matter one who that has never been a scribe and especially at this moment in time when there is an abundance of successful scribes in the Scottish Faternity such as the one and only Billy Wortley, Fifer, Round O' and John Harwood etc :o : : > > and yet they have never been approached :o .) I'm sure that the fanciers thoughout the UK and Scotland will have appreciated reading Joe's articles on the successful fanciers and gallant pigeons that have flown historicly into Scotland and that have created history in the greatset club in Britian which dates back to 1897. I will appologies to my fellow pigeonbasics members for been biased in my last statement about the "greatest club in history" but when you look back in history and appreciate the members and pigeons who have graced the history of this club many of which has been reported by Joe Murphy in the fancy press. I'm sure the members of the S.N.F.C that have done well over the last 25 to 30 years will agree with me in saying they have been done proud with Joe in his reportings as the S.N.F.C public relations officer in which he reported in the British homing world, Racing pigeon, Libline, Pictorial and also the SNFC internet site that he ran as well. A terrible loss for the members of the SNFC. :( :( cheers Gareth
rednyellow Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 :(well said gareth,you use the word replaced is this the case or has joe stepped down either way he will be a hard act to follow, not so sure about scott gibson when maybe scott could do more by doing less, not the correct decision i fear at the present time.
eastcoaster Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 How can scott gibson possibly have the good off SNFC at heart when as already said he is still threatening legal action against us!! WRONG CHOICE
Henrik Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 Well I for one wont be phoning the PRO with the time of any bird I get in the National.
andy Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 How can scott gibson possibly have the good off SNFC at heart when as already said he is still threatening legal action against us!! WRONG CHOICE Agree with you 100% a poor decision by the committee to replace an experienced scribe with a complete novice who was slandering the fancy in the national press a few months ago for putting himself in the looney bin.......A fantasy story......maybe he'd be better writing fairy tales. :(
me Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 Agree with you 100% a poor decision by the committee to replace an experienced scribe with a complete novice who was slandering the fancy in the national press a few months ago for putting himself in the looney bin.......A fantasy story......maybe he'd be better writing fairy tales. :( hope you are sure of your facts Andy because your comments are certainly actionable!
andy Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 hope you are sure of your facts Andy because your comments are certainly actionable! Aye let him try??? It was in the Sun for all too see>>>
Delboy Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 Agree with you 100% a poor decision by the committee to replace an experienced scribe with a complete novice who was slandering the fancy in the national press a few months ago for putting himself in the looney bin.......A fantasy story......maybe he'd be better writing fairy tales. :( Cant agree with you more Andy.I am totally disillusioned with the SNFC.This man should distance himself from anything that could add to the speculation that surrounds him.As my mate says, a fox looking after the hen hut.Can anyone remember Scott Gibson failing to supply the PRO with info regarding his winners.I can, then, ironically he ends up with the job.Whats the committee thinking about.In fact, I think the SNFC owes alot to Joe Muurphy for his writings in the last few years, especially with the politics going on in the sport at present.
stoolpigeon Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 the national will be better without mr murphy
jock3 Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 as a member i think the snfc was wrong in sacking j murphy, this man has promoted the snfc to no ends, because some of the committee dont like him, they have got rid of him, it should not matter if he is liked or not, he done a first class job for the snfc, why was this not brought up at the agm? i for one would not allow this man in my garden, i also spoke to snfc winning lofts in the south section, and they r of the same opinion, they also would not allow the new scribe through their gate
johno Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 i read this and then find the joint convoying thread is locked. much to think about.
rembrant2coo Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 i read this and then find the joint convoying thread is locked. much to think about. your spot on there johno it gets to near the bone for them mate
square_peg Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 your spot on there johno it gets to near the bone for them mate EXPLAIN HARRY COS I AM THICK
Taylorsloft Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 if he ever comes round to anyone on heres loft dont drop a rubber band. ive got ets
HOMER49 Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 your spot on there johno it gets to near the bone for them mate Hi At least the SNFC dos not break the LAW unlike the SNRPC Cheers Homer 49
rembrant2coo Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 Hi At least the SNFC dos not break the LAW unlike the SNRPC Cheers Homer 49 explain mr blyth what law
johno Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 serious accusation homer. you know of a criminal act. you could be arrested for obstructing the course of justice. what are the facts?
HOMER49 Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 explain mr blyth what law Hi VOSA Cheers Homer 49
johno Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 i see yo have no facts homer just your usual mistruths. you are proving yourself an extremely emibittered and unreliable poster by your own actions.
johno Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 sorry i have just noticed there is a homer and a homer 49 on the board. i am refering to homer 49 posts.
homer Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 sorry i have just noticed there is a homer and a homer 49 on the board. i am refering to homer 49 posts. thank you
HOMER49 Posted February 10, 2008 Report Posted February 10, 2008 i see yo have no facts homer just your usual mistruths. you are proving yourself an extremely emibittered and unreliable poster by your own actions. Hi Your a fine one to talk about being bitter 10 tears No cheers for you
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now