naedoos Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 my opinion dougie for what it is worth mate , and i know you will say different listen to your father -in -law when it comes to the doos , he is a goodman with the doo,s and a gentleman always had time for JOHN NESS and his good lady Thanks Harry, that means a lot to me to here you say that, can't understand how you say I will think different though. He talks well of you also, n also telt me a few stories aboot ye ;D ;D ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naedoos Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 An understatement there Harry Good advice Dougie Thanks to you also Ian, advice taken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Davie Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Yes i voted yesterday to allow all members irrespective of which union they are in to be able to join the SNFC if they so wish and good luck to everyone in both clubs this year lets hope we all have good racing 8) 8)I also voted to allow SNFC membership to any fancier who is a member of a recognised union, after all it was proposed by two members of the management comittee,was dissapointed that this proposal was turned over by such a large majority, ive said it before were killing the sport from the inside out. Good luck to all in 2009. Davie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 I also voted to allow SNFC membership to any fancier who is a member of a recognised union, after all it was proposed by two members of the management comittee,was dissapointed that this proposal was turned over by such a large majority, ive said it before were killing the sport from the inside out. Good luck to all in 2009. Davie i guess that puts paid to all the talk about getting back together or even joint convoying for the foreseeable future the members have stated what they want no getting away from that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gareth Rankin Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 i guess that puts paid to all the talk about getting back together or even joint convoying for the foreseeable future the members have stated what they want no getting away from that I do believe you are 100% correct Frank, disappointing! but the meeting has cleared the air with what was the ratification of what happened at the split in 2005. We wil just have to get on with our own business but enjoy the great performances put up with the pigeons in each of the Scottish distance clubs. Onwards and upwards. Gareth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotrod Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 I do believe you are 100% correct Frank, disappointing! but the meeting has cleared the air with what was the ratification of what happened at the split in 2005. We wil just have to get on with our own business but enjoy the great performances put up with the pigeons in each of the Scottish distance clubs. Onwards and upwards. Gareth bang on big man just a shame what happened again but thats democracy ,unless you walk out lol, but hey we,ll just have to get on with our own business ,and your correct, enjoy the great perfomances put up with birds in both clubs, not come on here slagging them off. fanciers like you and some others know the real score thanks see you at blackpool maybe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 i hope thats what hapens from now on all the talk should now stop about the two getting back just now sad but true all the best for 2009 to all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank-123 Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 its a pity i thought there was more of a feeling for getting the nationals back as one i guess i underestimated the feelings on both sides although i think it is wrong i must get on with it maybe in the future we will be one good luck to all the snrpc/snfc guys for 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 both sides frank dont know what you mean by that we had nothing to do with the feeling at the snfc agm or are we getting the blame for that aswell? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank-123 Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 both sides frank dont know what you mean by that we had nothing to do with the feeling at the snfc agm or are we getting the blame for that aswell? paranoid?? there is feeling on both side to remain apart does that sound better frank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red.Yoyo Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 There was no "us" & "them" at the SNFC AGM. Only "us". It is interesting to note that if the few that voted FOR last weekend had voted FOR 5 years ago it would have been carried with a substancial majority. Now it is left with existing members to decide what is in their opinion the best way forward and forget the agro. It is a fact that some SNFC rules are at odds with SHU rules yet this seems unimportant. It was a sad day when the SNFC took on the fight of the SHU. That should have been left to SHU meeting where yet again very few people attended. Enjoy your racing regardless of which club you fly with. Thankfully the doos dont know the difference. Best wishes for 2009 and for what ever short time the doo game has left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest redwhiteblue Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 There was no "us" & "them" at the SNFC AGM. Only "us". It is interesting to note that if the few that voted FOR last weekend had voted FOR 5 years ago it would have been carried with a substancial majority. Now it is left with existing members to decide what is in their opinion the best way forward and forget the agro. It is a fact that some SNFC rules are at odds with SHU rules yet this seems unimportant. It was a sad day when the SNFC took on the fight of the SHU. That should have been left to SHU meeting where yet again very few people attended. Enjoy your racing regardless of which club you fly with. Thankfully the doos dont know the difference. Best wishes for 2009 and for what ever short time the doo game has left. hi ian r u sill in kirky racing the doos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 paranoid?? there is feeling on both side to remain apart does that sound better frank not paranoid frank we had nothing to do with the vote as redyoyo says snfc members which was their right at their agm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotrod Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 how many where at the agm?approx? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest redwhiteblue Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 how many where at the agm?approx? hi m8 130 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 hi m8 130 95+36=131 ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotrod Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 hi m8 130 a bit dissapointing considering the number of members,i know there were a few well known men not there surprised me that did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jock3 Posted January 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 there were about 160 at meeting not all voted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotrod Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 there were about 160 at meeting not all voted well thats no to bad, i thought the way the voices on here were talking it was going to be standing room only Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naedoos Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 well thats no to bad, i thought the way the voices on here were talking it was going to be standing room only There wis enough to take care o things Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotrod Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 There wis enough to take care o things im not meaning anything bad just a question come off yer high horse/camel whatever you ride naedoos i thought we buried the hatchet lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 The 1 thing i was'nt really happy about was how easy the accountant got voted back in again seen as he had put his price up by £700 this year and it was'nt put to tender :-/ As was said in the hall on saturday that's his holiday taken care of again this year... Just remember if there were 150 approx of us at the meeting on saturday nearly all of our subs for this year will go to pay his bill!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naedoos Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 thought things were a bit quiet th'nite ;D ;D ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian McKay Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 The 1 thing i was'nt really happy about was how easy the accountant got voted back in again seen as he had put his price up by £700 this year and it was'nt put to tender :-/ As was said in the hall on saturday that's his holiday taken care of again this year... Just remember if there were 150 approx of us at the meeting on saturday nearly all of our subs for this year will go to pay his bill!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Nice one Alf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jock3 Posted January 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 HOW MANY MEMBERS OF THE 2008 COMMITTE ARE STILL THERE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.