johno

thanks for your help.

anyone got a distance for saintes to a uk location?

homer 49 i have reported your post to the webmaster. i am not willing to discuss anything anything further. you have had the opportunity to put up but failed. i hope you find what you are looking for although i very much doubt it.

post number 32 is aimed at homer 49. in response to his absurd allegation that the snrpc in some way or other has been complicit in a criminal act by breaking the law.

it is now 12 minutes since you last made any response. the criminal accusations that you have made on a public forum are the most serious i have experienced on this forum. this being the case i would demand that you openly and freely apologise and make right the mischevious and devious allegations you have made. once you have done this we can all get on with factual discussion.

no response. no proof of anything. malicious and mischevious posting. no surprising.

if there is somethng going on be a man tell us. i will take the matter further. tell us the criminal acts that have taken place.

no facts. homer 49. poor unreliable and bitter.

once again homer 49 no facts no answer no true. this is the right place for you to do this. everyone can see what an obsessed bitter unreliable person you are. making criminal accusations but no facts to back them up. no need for me to try and make you look foolish you are doing an outstanding job yourself.try the playground the morrow for a level of discusion you may find more appropriate to your level of wit and guile.

sorry i have just noticed there is a homer and a homer 49 on the board. i am refering to homer 49 posts.

i see yo have no facts homer just your usual mistruths. you are proving yourself an extremely emibittered and unreliable poster by your own actions.

serious accusation homer. you know of a criminal act. you could be arrested for obstructing the course of justice. what are the facts?

no could not manage unfortunately.

the 2008 season races are 7th june wanstead flats. last friday in june 28th i think reims gold medal race. ist week in july st nazaire. 3rd week in july arras. 4th week in july arrangeents have been made for a race from saints. yb national september from leicester. i do not know the exact dates. the first two are right. all prices joining etc same as 2007.

i read this and then find the joint convoying thread is locked. much to think about.

no agro. no dangerous accusations. facts. pure and simple facts.

if money talks bart it seems that no one was listening in 2006 and 2007 in snfc. 15000 loss each year.

facts seem to frighten people. why?

last years hero this years scapegoat. replacement found immediately rembrandt.

while there was a race with around 126 at it there have been other 500 mile races with around 600. i fail to understand how making people aware of facts is frightening so many people especially when some of these people do not race in scotland. i would suggest that any efficeint and prudent business would be very wary to get involved wih another similar type business that has repeatedly and consistently stood back and watched while loosing around 15000 pounds per annum on a turnoverof around 100k. . joint convoying should in a normal situation lead to economies o scale. reducing the real cost for those involved. one organisation while managing to convince all the feds in the shu to go to the coast on the same transporter has managed to produce a substantial loss leading to significant price increases. it would make more financial sense for people to examine the facts and make themselves aware of reality. this would lead to no price hikes and no subsidising innefficient and poorly run organisations.

put them all in together. if one bird is not good enough to be paired to any other bird of the opposite sex in the sectin at least one of them should not be there. the only reason i can see for interfering with nature is if you have brothers and sisters and mothers and sons fathers and daughters all together and you do not want to inbreed. if the cocks cannot find a nesting site and defend it and attract a hen then maybe they should not be there.

i have no opinion. all i am doing is pointing out facts. i make no comparison. the facts allow people to be better informed if they wish to make a decision. the choice is that of the individual.

the one fact you point out cricketer is correct. all the facts in my post are correct.

sapper facts are as laid out. anyone who can prove them wrong feel free.

facts is facts. nothing one sided about it. what facts are wrong? if they are wrong they are wrong. if they are right there is nothing on sided about them.