Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

maybe unnecessary but if it has to go through then maybe one hour is too tight for channel races. id say , one hour in inland races and 2-3 hours in channel races.

But why does it have to go through? like I said the committee must have concerns about the current security that this action will solve, other wise there is no justification in having it, we need to keep members and the risk of good birds losing ligitamite positions and performances will only drive them away.

Does anyone know what is driving the committee to propose this?

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

But why does it have to go through? like I said the committee must have concerns about the current security that this action will solve, other wise there is no justification in having it, we need to keep members and the risk of good birds losing ligitamite positions and performances will only drive them away.

Does anyone know what is driving the committee to propose this?

no need for it just leave it as is

Posted

Perhaps the proposal to phone your bird in is a percussion for introducing security measures as is the norm in National Races down South and next year they will introduce the wing stamp with security number bringing the Security a step in line with the latter where you have to phone in the wing stamp number or disqualification is incurred. The fanciers in England dont have an issue with it and actually welcome it so why dont we.

Posted

Why is it needed at all Derek.......I know I am probably the last person that should be discussing it lol. For the record I ain't bothered either way :drinking-coffee-200:

 

Don't really care either way now Stevie, Im just sending my doos regardless, I think if its a security thing then it is a decade late :emoticon-0127-lipssealed:

Posted

Don't really care either way now Stevie, Im just sending my doos regardless, I think if its a security thing then it is a decade late :emoticon-0127-lipssealed:

probs

Posted

probs

 

They've been trying to get us sorry your good distance flyers I only dabbled now and again lol to report first pigeons siince a was about 12 in 1980 still never happened don't suppose it will happen now lol good luck

Posted

SNFC 2010 had a great race and the wee nat has had 10 decent years racing reims. :partick-thistle-Crest:

Hope yer right.............No like the east masel lol

Posted

Hope yer right.............No like the east masel lol

 

 

2010 Reims 1st sec 7th open D Norden and 6 solway doos in the top 20,no probs for you guys in the solway and will probably be won there!!!!! Yet again. :partick-thistle-Crest: :partick-thistle-Crest:

Posted

2010 Reims 1st sec 7th open D Norden and 6 solway doos in the top 20,no probs for you guys in the solway and will probably be won there!!!!! Yet again. :partick-thistle-Crest: :partick-thistle-Crest:

Keep going John your writing ma speech for me! although Im sure ma bus load will help too!!

Posted

Keep going John your writing ma speech for me! although Im sure ma bus load will help too!!

It's just a preference for me Andy to stay on the more traditional route but will race from anywhere that is voted in, bus loads a bit of a turn off for me as I ain't a meeting kind of guy, best of luck boys

Posted

Perhaps the proposal to phone your bird in is a percussion for introducing security measures as is the norm in National Races down South and next year they will introduce the wing stamp with security number bringing the Security a step in line with the latter where you have to phone in the wing stamp number or disqualification is incurred. The fanciers in England dont have an issue with it and actually welcome it so why dont we.

 

 

A can see how a wing stamp would improve security Peter, and a would support it wholeheartedly, but unless they provide a free service tae record the doos arrival and security number then IMO it amounts to a financial Penalty for timing in and any additional costs tae members must be applied tae all members not just a section of us who are lucky enough to get a decent wan in the clock.

 

Should point out that a Decent wan is very much a strager in my Clock lately so its unlikely to affect me that much sad.gifsad.gifsad.gif but I like Fairness and this is Not fair tae some members. jmo

Posted

A can see how a wing stamp would improve security Peter, and a would support it wholeheartedly, but unless they provide a free service tae record the doos arrival and security number then IMO it amounts to a financial Penalty for timing in and any additional costs tae members must be applied tae all members not just a section of us who are lucky enough to get a decent wan in the clock.

 

Should point out that a Decent wan is very much a strager in my Clock lately so its unlikely to affect me that much sad.gifsad.gifsad.gif but I like Fairness and this is Not fair tae some members. jmo

What is the securtiy risk?

If someone has found a way to cheat, they must have found a way to deliver their clock to the marking station with a ligitamate time in, so phoning in wouldn't stop this, they would do what ever it is they are doing and just phone in within the hour?? or an I missing something?

Posted

I'm no that paranoid so I don't think phoning in a doo should be made a rule....I trust everyone at the marking stations to the convoyers and fellow fanciers are doing their jobs right....Just enjoy yer doos and try get a good one that's my plan

Posted

I'm no that paranoid so I don't think phoning in a doo should be made a rule....I trust everyone at the marking stations to the convoyers and fellow fanciers are doing their jobs right....Just enjoy yer doos and try get a good one that's my plan

Here, here, there is enough sh@te going on without creating more, good luck for 2016 everyone.

Posted

What is the securtiy risk?

If someone has found a way to cheat, they must have found a way to deliver their clock to the marking station with a ligitamate time in, so phoning in wouldn't stop this, they would do what ever it is they are doing and just phone in within the hour?? or an I missing something?

 

I never mentioned Risks Robert, I said improve security and any new way tae identify each bird and be Certain it Went to the race with the rest must be an improvement.... But yer right, cheaters would find a way tae cheat regardless.

 

But cheatin isn't a concern ave got, ma concern is that for timing in you're gonna get "taxed" for it, or worse yer gonna get disqualified for no doing it. A would be very interested on how we could defend ourselfs in court if somebody took us tae task for being disqualified with an entirely legal time in........instinctively a think we'd lose the case, and lots of £££££ into the bargain.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Advert: Morray Firth One Loft Classic
  • Advert: M.A.C. Lofts Pigeon Products
  • Advert: RV Woodcraft
  • Advert: B.Leefe & Sons
  • Advert: Apex Garden Buildings
  • Advert: Racing Pigeon Supplies
  • Advert: Solway Feeders


×
×
  • Create New...