Delboy Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Have a look at Mr McCords and Mr Rankins statement.Its a bad day when an internet forum cannot talk about this topic and the BHW don't have a problem printing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian McKay Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Its a bad day when an internet forum cannot talk about this topic and the BHW don't have a problem printing it. There was no problem about your topic Del it the others that followed which had nothing to do with the site The president of one of the organisation asked for people that do not know what they are talking about to stop posting (chat)as it is not finished and may predjuce the case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delboy Posted January 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 I can understand what you mean Ian but sometimes FREEDOM OF SPEECH etc should apply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie1234 Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Del are both statements in the homing world? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b.massey Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Its Basically all that was put up on here from Gareth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiger Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 they will end up barring him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE FIFER Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Publishing something on forums and in papers could Could do more harm than good, in any case if it comes up, and as Ian says, a lot of the posts were nothing to do with the thread which was put up for getting names, not to settle arguments, and how many post etc were from non SNFC members, even not a embers of a club, this could only be settled once and for all by the SNFC. And it's members, . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Am not necessarily referring to the articles published etc. But to what some may regard as 'Freedom of Speech''Freedom of speech has so many aspects - and quite rightly - to it that it isn't in reality, now or ever has been a 'Freedom of Speech'. Indeed is nigh a myth. Insults / sexist / racist etc. etc. aren't part and partial to 'Freedom of Speech. Too many think that uttering 'Freedom of speech' gives one enblock the right to say whatever they want REGARDLESS. etc. etc. It simply is a myth that, and certainly not what the spirit it is intended. For instance where is the difference between freedom of speech and slander? etc. etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie1234 Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 they will end up barring himLooks like someone was trying to get him banned before :emoticon-0127-lipssealed: Freedom of speech has so many aspects - and quite rightly - to it that it isn't in reality, now or ever has been a 'Freedom of Speech'. Insults / sexist / racist etc. etc. aren't part and partial to 'Freedom of Speech. Too many think that uttering 'Freedom of speech' gives one enblock the right to say whatever they want REGARDLESS. etc. etc. It simply is a myth that, and certainly not what the spirit it is intended. For instance where is the difference between freedom of speech and slander? etc. etc.If I never knew any better I'd think you were a copper lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delboy Posted January 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Del are both statements in the homing world? Both statements Geo, there for everyone to read. I think the SNFC will call an EGM themselves now, which would be the right thing to do imo. The members need clarity and transparency brought back to the SNFC and anyone not wanting that has a question mark over them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie1234 Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Both statements Geo, there for everyone to read. I think the SNFC will call an EGM themselves now, which would be the right thing to do imo. The members need clarity and transparency brought back to the SNFC and anyone not wanting that has a question mark over them.Correct mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dal2 Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Its there for all to see now. Two questions that require answering initially, asked surely by an independent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delboy Posted January 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Am not necessarily referring to the articles published etc. But to what some may regard as 'Freedom of Speech''Freedom of speech has so many aspects - and quite rightly - to it that it isn't in reality, now or ever has been a 'Freedom of Speech'. Indeed is nigh a myth. Insults / sexist / racist etc. etc. aren't part and partial to 'Freedom of Speech. Too many think that uttering 'Freedom of speech' gives one enblock the right to say whatever they want REGARDLESS. etc. etc. It simply is a myth that, and certainly not what the spirit it is intended. For instance where is the difference between freedom of speech and slander? etc. etc. I agree Roland, too many think they can say what they want in a slanderous manner. Freedom of speech is the concept of the inherent human right to voice one's opinion publicly without fear of censorship or punishment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delboy Posted January 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Both statements Geo, there for everyone to read. I think the SNFC will call an EGM themselves now, which would be the right thing to do imo. The members need clarity and transparency brought back to the SNFC and anyone not wanting that has a question mark over them. Thinking again, what the SNFC should do and what they will do are 2 different things so lets get signing these forms for an EGM just in case its an under the carpet job, again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie1234 Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Thinking again, what the SNFC should do and what they will do are 2 different things so lets get signing these forms for an EGM just in case its an under the carpet job, again.Correct mate need to get it sorted or it will just snow ball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter swanston Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Publishing something on forums and in papers could Could do more harm than good, in any case if it comes up, and as Ian says, a lot of the posts were nothing to do with the thread which was put up for getting names, not to settle arguments, and how many post etc were from non SNFC members, even not a embers of a club, this could only be settled once and for all by the SNFC. And it's members, . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter swanston Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 "Publishing something on Forums or in papers could do more harm than good".Please tell me you are kidding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnc Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 i think if anyone was treated like gareth was they would do the same all he want is the truth to come out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian McKay Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 My reply was in connection to your original post which is on post 2 It's a pitty you have changed it to suit your own needs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delboy Posted January 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 My reply was in connection to your original post which is on post 2 It's a pitty you have changed it to suit your own needs ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delboy Posted January 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 There was no problem about your topic Del it the others that followed which had nothing to do with the site The president of one of the organisation asked for people that do not know what they are talking about to stop posting (chat)as it is not finished and may predjuce the case I didn't have a topic Ian? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian McKay Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 I didn't have a topic Ian? This was the last post I locked posted by you http://forum.pigeonbasics.com/topic/78742-crooks-in-the-pigeon-game/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delboy Posted January 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 This was the last post I locked posted by you http://forum.pigeonbasics.com/topic/78742-crooks-in-the-pigeon-game/ How is this relevant to this topic? Im not following you Ian, can you please explain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian McKay Posted January 29, 2015 Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 How is this relevant to this topic? Im not following you Ian, can you please explain. Your original post did not mention any names you altered it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delboy Posted January 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2015 Your original post did not mention any names you altered it What the hell are you talking about, its 2 totally different topics Ian.Im not talking about the crook thread being locked, im talking about John Quinns thread being locked , the one that's relevant to this thread!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts