Justice

[greenbar]

justice has been done,celts back in the champions leauge,more money for mr lawell.

[VMS]

They are appealing it on grounds of disapropriate punnishement as different punnishement was handed out for SE offence on previous occasions

[grdkeith]

They are appealing it on grounds of disapropriate punnishement as different punnishement was handed out for SE offence on previous occasions

do ye think we could go on and win it now vinnie ? :emoticon-0123-party:

[TheHigg]

justice has been done,celts back in the champions leauge,more money for mr lawell.

after last weeks scenario he better spend some or i can see a fans revolt coming

[VMS]

They are appealing it on grounds of disapropriate punnishement as different punnishement was handed out for SE offence on previous occasions

:lol: I think Malmo will beat yous on current form George :lol:

 

do ye think we could go on and win it now vinnie ? :emoticon-0123-party:

[sammy]

do ye think we could go on and win it now vinnie ? :emoticon-0123-party:

yi canny win a treble neva mind in europe :emoticon-0140-rofl:

[dal2]

:lol: I think Malmo will beat yous on current form George :lol:

Guid job they ain't playin malmo then lol

[VMS]

Guid job they ain't playin malmo then lol

They are in the next qualifying stage if they get reinstated :lol:or Maribor even

[Guest bigda]

They are appealing it on grounds of disapropriate punnishement as different punnishement was handed out for SE offence on previous occasions

 

the Bulgarian side did not have a man suspended also at the time 3-0 to celtic vinnie hand yer money back to wullie hill you dont what to be called a cheat do you, like yer team

Edited August 8, 2014 by bigda

[VMS]

the Bulgarian side did not have a man suspended also at the time 3-0 to celtic vinnie hand yer money back to wullie hill you dont what to be called a cheat do you, like yer team

Proven not guilty not like youselfs

[Guest bigda]

hope all you lads on here come out and support the team in europe we need you all so as to get the points up, for when rangers make there come back it will be easier for them to get into uefa the cup

Edited August 8, 2014 by bigda

[bibendium]

Justice has been done???

 

Poor hard done to Celtic, always bemoaning that everyone is against them.

[Guest bigda]

Justice has been done???

 

Poor hard done to Celtic, always bemoaning that everyone is against them.

 

would like to clear up some thing about rules and rangers in europe

in 1971-72 they should not have been cup winners, if they defend integrity and all, as they got help from the ref when he called for extra time, when there was none to be added he then allowed penalty's which sporting won 3-0 but rangers moaned about it and got the game, but they where in the wrong as the first leg was played at ibrox 20th october 19-71-72 season the score was rangers 3 sporting 2 goals rangers scored 3 times 5min 10min 30min sporting cp 2 and was at 67min 88min then onto the second leg 3rd November the score at the 90 min mark was

sporting 3 time scored was 25 38 87 min rangers 2 time scored 26 46 that made it 5 each no advantage then extra time came in, they both score rangers in 100 min and sporting score 115 min so its down to penaltys sporting win that by 3 goals yet rangers got the game turned by saying they scored the away goal but they did not want to count the 3 goals scored when they got beat in the penalty's the score before the penalty's was then sporting cp 4 and rangers 3 so it was a draw no away goal at all counted yet they got given the game

[bibendium]

would like to clear up some thing about rules and rangers in europe

in 1971-72 they should not have been cup winners, if they defend integrity and all, as they got help from the ref when he called for extra time, when there was none to be added he then allowed penalty's which sporting won 3-0 but rangers moaned about it and got the game, but they where in the wrong as the first leg was played at ibrox 20th october 19-71-72 season the score was rangers 3 sporting 2 goals rangers scored 3 times 5min 10min 30min sporting cp 2 and was at 67min 88min then onto the second leg 3rd November the score at the 90 min mark was

sporting 3 time scored was 25 38 87 min rangers 2 time scored 26 46 that made it 5 each no advantage then extra time came in, they both score rangers in 100 min and sporting score 115 min so its down to penaltys sporting win that by 3 goals yet rangers got the game turned by saying they scored the away goal but they did not want to count the 3 goals scored when they got beat in the penalty's the score before the penalty's was then sporting cp 4 and rangers 3 so it was a draw no away goal at all counted yet they got given the game

Im not a Rangers supporter so could not give a toss!

[DJWa]

would like to clear up some thing about rules and rangers in europe

in 1971-72 they should not have been cup winners, if they defend integrity and all, as they got help from the ref when he called for extra time, when there was none to be added he then allowed penalty's which sporting won 3-0 but rangers moaned about it and got the game, but they where in the wrong as the first leg was played at ibrox 20th october 19-71-72 season the score was rangers 3 sporting 2 goals rangers scored 3 times 5min 10min 30min sporting cp 2 and was at 67min 88min then onto the second leg 3rd November the score at the 90 min mark was

sporting 3 time scored was 25 38 87 min rangers 2 time scored 26 46 that made it 5 each no advantage then extra time came in, they both score rangers in 100 min and sporting score 115 min so its down to penaltys sporting win that by 3 goals yet rangers got the game turned by saying they scored the away goal but they did not want to count the 3 goals scored when they got beat in the penalty's the score before the penalty's was then sporting cp 4 and rangers 3 so it was a draw no away goal at all counted yet they got given the game

don't know your point danny

 

the game ends at the end of extra time

only if both legs are exactly the same eg 1-1 and 1-1 or 2-2 and 2-2

would extra time be played

as you said 3-2 at ibrox and 3-4 away 6-6 on agrigate

the team scoring the most away goals wins simple

[Guest bigda]

don't know your point danny

 

the game ends at the end of extra time

only if both legs are exactly the same eg 1-1 and 1-1 or 2-2 and 2-2

would extra time be played

as you said 3-2 at ibrox and 3-4 away 6-6 on agrigate

the team scoring the most away goals wins simple

 

before extra time, the score was 3-2 to sporting cp that then meant all square 5 each no away goals, after extra time it was then 4 3 than then cancelled out once again the away goal, there was then penalty's in witch sporting win by 3 goals they where the wining side, scoring away goal only counts, if the score had been 3 each not 4- 3

[DJWa]

before extra time, the score was 3-2 to sporting cp that then meant all square 5 each no away goals, after extra time it was then 4 3 than then cancelled out once again the away goal, there was then penalty's in witch sporting win by 3 goals they where the wining side, scoring away goal only counts, if the score had been 3 each not 4- 3

 

danny the extra time goals are still in the away goals rule

they don't stop at 90 minutes, but continue for the extra 30 minutes

 

4-3 with 3 away goals against sportings 2 from the 1st leg

 

so there couldn't be penalties

[Guest bigda]

danny the extra time goals are still in the away goals rule

they don't stop at 90 minutes, but continue for the extra 30 minutes

 

4-3 with 3 away goals against sportings 2 from the 1st leg

 

so there couldn't be penalties

 

before extra time the score was 3-2 that made it 5 each same score rangers had first leg extra time a goal each, still made it the same result, so penalty's to be taken sporting CP WIN 3 - 0 on penaltys and if you had bet £100 on rangers wining on away goal, you would have loosed as they got beat 4-3 in that game SO HOW COULD THE

3RD GOAL COUNT, AS DOUBLE WHEN THE 4TH GOAL CANCELLED IT OUT THERE WAS NO ADVANTAGE TO SPORTING, AS THERE WAS NOT ANOTHER PLACE THEY COULD PLAY TO NULLIFY THE AWAY GOAL. BEFORE THE EXTRA TIME THEY ALREADY SCORED THE EXTRA GOAL TO HAVE PENALTY'S SO IF YOU ADD IT UP RANGERS FIRST GAME WAS 3-2 WIN

SECOND GAME SPORTING AFTER 90 MIN 3-2 SO EQUAL RANGERS THEN SCORE AS YOU SAY THE THIRD GOAL BUT SPORTING SCORE THE 4TH TO NULLIFY THAT GOAL SO ITS PENALTYS HOPE THIS HAS HELPED

[sammy]

her wan for yi danny boy that a found might interest yi :emoticon-0136-giggle:

 

 

 

 

We have a pigeon 4 wheel trailer approx. 10ft 6 in long x6ft 6in wide with curtain sides quick release system and watering facility only used twice this season for open races and is too small for our needs comes complete with 32 crates max capacity 800 pigeons this was advertised for sale before and deposit received and was asked to keep till y/b racing begins now they have changed their mind and are not going to train other peoples birds as first thought hence back up for sale I can email pictures of trailer to you but do not know how to upload have tried £1000 no offers cost lot more

[Guest bigda]

her wan for yi danny boy that a found might interest yi :emoticon-0136-giggle:

 

 

 

 

We have a pigeon 4 wheel trailer approx. 10ft 6 in long x6ft 6in wide with curtain sides quick release system and watering facility only used twice this season for open races and is too small for our needs comes complete with 32 crates max capacity 800 pigeons this was advertised for sale before and deposit received and was asked to keep till y/b racing begins now they have changed their mind and are not going to train other peoples birds as first thought hence back up for sale I can email pictures of trailer to you but do not know how to upload have tried £1000 no offers cost lot more

 

click on the picture and save to pictures or your documents give it a number so as to find it again then on here where it says open a reply to this thread it says choose file click it attach file it will go back to the last thing you done with picture then click where it says open and just click attach this file

[DJWa]

before extra time the score was 3-2 that made it 5 each same score rangers had first leg extra time a goal each, still made it the same result, so penalty's to be taken sporting CP WIN 3 - 0 on penaltys and if you had bet £100 on rangers wining on away goal, you would have loosed as they got beat 4-3 in that game SO HOW COULD THE

3RD GOAL COUNT, AS DOUBLE WHEN THE 4TH GOAL CANCELLED IT OUT THERE WAS NO ADVANTAGE TO SPORTING, AS THERE WAS NOT ANOTHER PLACE THEY COULD PLAY TO NULLIFY THE AWAY GOAL. BEFORE THE EXTRA TIME THEY ALREADY SCORED THE EXTRA GOAL TO HAVE PENALTY'S SO IF YOU ADD IT UP RANGERS FIRST GAME WAS 3-2 WIN

SECOND GAME SPORTING AFTER 90 MIN 3-2 SO EQUAL RANGERS THEN SCORE AS YOU SAY THE THIRD GOAL BUT SPORTING SCORE THE 4TH TO NULLIFY THAT GOAL SO ITS PENALTYS HOPE THIS HAS HELPED

 

the game continues into extra time so the score adds to the 90 minute score danny 3-2 and both teams score it becomes 4-3

and the away goals rule is still in effect

 

if a game goes into extra time and someone scores then there cannot be a penalty shoot out

[Guest bigda]

the game continues into extra time so the score adds to the 90 minute score danny 3-2 and both teams score it becomes 4-3

and the away goals rule is still in effect

 

if a game goes into extra time and someone scores then there cannot be a penalty shoot out

 

the game was at the 90min 3. 2 score now that qualify s it as a draw is that not correct, the game finishes a goal ahead 4-3 is that not a draw so the out come was correct penalty s they took penalty's sporting won that 3-0 the away goal you are on about is an imaginary 3 goal counting again as away goal and sporting would have to have won 5-3 and that but as they got the 4th goal that left it down to penalty s as your team already got the benefit from the away goal, you cant get it twice but the ref was confused by his own judgement so the result should have been penalty's

[DJWa]

the game was at the 90min 3. 2 score now that qualify s it as a draw is that not correct, the game finishes a goal ahead 4-3 is that not a draw so the out come was correct penalty s they took penalty's sporting won that 3-0 the away goal you are on about is an imaginary 3 goal counting again as away goal and sporting would have to have won 5-3 and that but as they got the 4th goal that left it down to penalty s as your team already got the benefit from the away goal, you cant get it twice but the ref was confused by his own judgement so the result should have been penalty's

 

 

not my team danny

 

but the rules in European games are as I have stated m8

 

in domestic games where there is or can be

( a no away goals rule)( eg when extra time is played in a one off game then it would be as you say)

 

ive watched a lot of European matches when it goes into extra time

then someone scores and the comentators say that there has now to be a winner in 120 minutes

as the game cannot now go to penalties

[Guest bigda]

 

 

not my team danny

 

but the rules in European games are as I have stated m8

 

in domestic games where there is or can be

( a no away goals rule)( eg when extra time is played in a one off game then it would be as you say)

 

ive watched a lot of European matches when it goes into extra time

then someone scores and the comentators say that there has now to be a winner in 120 minutes

as the game cannot now go to penalties

 

the only way it can be played out is extra time, away goals don't count, as the home team cant get another park to play in so as he has the away goal second chance as both have had,

[DJWa]

the only way it can be played out is extra time, away goals don't count, as the home team cant get another park to play in so as he has the away goal second chance as both have had,

 

the away team get the bonus of the chance of another away goal

as the home team get the bonus of playing the extra 30 minutes at home

 

we will just have to agree to disagree m8