Snfc Sections

[frank-123]

Just wondered if anyone thought these sections are fairer than what the snfc have now

these area's would all be defined by council area

 

so what ever council empty's your bin that's what area you would fly in

 

 

north lanarkshire south lanarkshire AREA 1

 

midlothian edinburgh east lothian scottish borders AREA 2

 

west lothian falkirk clackmananshire stirlingshire AREA 3

 

east and west dumbartonshire inverclyde glasgow city east renfrewshire renfrewshire argyle& bute AREA 4

 

perth fife dundee angus AREA 5

 

aberdeenshire morayshire highlands AREA 6

 

dumfries and galloway south,east and north ayrshire AREA 7

[Guest IB]

Frank, the Council boundaries are no more scientifically thought out or fairer than existing SNFC Sections. Parts of the same street can be in different Council Areas. And the boundaries do change.

 

Post Code is also a laugh - it does 'exactly what it says on the envelope' a code that includes the delivery post office, and a numbered circle of zones with that post office at the centre.

 

Yes I think Sections must be mapped, but based on longitude and latitude. That never changes, and is the basis for club / fed boundaries just now.

[frank-123]

Frank, the Council boundaries are no more scientifically thought out or fairer than existing SNFC Sections. Parts of the same street can be in different Council Areas. And the boundaries do change.

 

Post Code is also a laugh - it does 'exactly what it says on the envelope' a code that includes the delivery post office, and a numbered circle of zones with that post office at the centre.

 

Yes I think Sections must be mapped, but based on longitude and latitude. That never changes, and is the basis for club / fed boundaries just now.

 

Ian

council boundaries can change but like lanarkshire fed our boundary it was made in 1972 I thought the boundary commission would have thought up the scottish council area's. So guys who have been trained and who's job it is would need to put a lot more thought into it than a few doo men meeting at an agm

same street in two council area's maybe so but it is not across the road i would imagine a long street may divided

[johnc]

what about argyle/ bute frank

[DJWa]

you boys must be having a laugh

look at the size of your sections compared with the north section

stonehaven upto wick/thurso also incorparating the outlying islands

shetland etc

prob the same size as all the other sections put together

 

how about just 3 sections

sec 1 everything south of the forth

sec 2 everything above the forth upto stonehaven

sec 3 everything north of stonehaven

[walterbmasson]

you boys must be having a laugh

look at the size of your sections compared with the north section

stonehaven upto wick/thurso also incorparating the outlying islands

shetland etc

prob the same size as all the other sections put together

 

how about just 3 sections

sec 1 everything south of the forth

sec 2 everything above the forth upto stonehaven

sec 3 everything north of stonehaven

 

A VOTE ON DAVIES SECTIONS BUMP BUMP BUMP --- SILENCE IS GOLDEN;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

[JADE]

you boys must be having a laugh

look at the size of your sections compared with the north section

stonehaven upto wick/thurso also incorparating the outlying islands

shetland etc

prob the same size as all the other sections put together

 

how about just 3 sections

sec 1 everything south of the forth

sec 2 everything above the forth upto stonehaven

sec 3 everything north of stonehaven

 

brilliant. not a chance tho

[frank-123]

what about argyle/ bute frank

 

added it too area 4

[frank-123]

you boys must be having a laugh

look at the size of your sections compared with the north section

stonehaven upto wick/thurso also incorparating the outlying islands

shetland etc

prob the same size as all the other sections put together

 

how about just 3 sections

sec 1 everything south of the forth

sec 2 everything above the forth upto stonehaven

sec 3 everything north of stonehaven

 

how many doo men in the highlands council area ?

[Guest KING BILLY]

Just wondered if anyone thought these sections are fairer than what the snfc have now

these area's would all be defined by council area

 

so what ever council empty's your bin that's what area you would fly in

 

 

north lanarkshire south lanarkshire AREA 1

 

midlothian edinburgh east lothian scottish borders AREA 2

 

west lothian falkirk clackmananshire stirlingshire AREA 3

 

east and west dumbartonshire inverclyde glasgow city east renfrewshire renfrewshire argyle& bute AREA 4

 

perth fife dundee angus AREA 5

 

aberdeenshire morayshire highlands AREA 6

 

dumfries and galloway south,east and north ayrshire AREA 7

its the same auld crap the ones that compet every year should be the ones that deside about chang not the fancers that never compet i think wee should start a pole doo you think the members that dont go should have the same say as the members who doo its the same in every club every fed every national with the arm char voters getting thare way then not going fec it up for the members that compet every year

[frank-123]

how many doo men in the highlands council area ?

 

just checked 49 lofts in 2010 wonder how many are members of the snfc

[K J Young]

Area 7 is just laughable ,

[DJWa]

how many doo men in the highlands council area ?

 

not sure as to what that area covers frank

but would hazzard a guess at about 280/300 fanciers north of stonehaven

if there was a highland sec you may see some of the boys further north having a go

but remember these boys would be flying well over 400 miles for the ybn

at the moment they would be flying against boys over 100 miles south of them in section g and have virtually no chance of a ticket

my point is that some of the southern sec lads are complaining of being in the same sec as someone 5,10,15,20 miles N,S,E,or WEST of them

try being 50 to 100+ miles and in the same section

sections should be set on area covered not how many fanciers are in it

[frank-123]

Area 7 is just laughable ,

 

rather than state it is laughable tell us what you think would be better or stay the same

[frank-123]

not sure as to what that area covers frank

but would hazzard a guess at about 280/300 fanciers north of stonehaven

if there was a highland sec you may see some of the boys further north having a go

but remember these boys would be flying well over 400 miles for the ybn

at the moment they would be flying against boys over 100 miles south of them in section g and have virtually no chance of a ticket

my point is that some of the southern sec lads are complaining of being in the same sec as someone 5,10,15,20 miles N,S,E,or WEST of them

try being 50 to 100+ miles and in the same section

sections should be set on area covered not how many fanciers are in it

 

can't see it being a problem if highland area was on it's own and aberdeen and morayshire were as one section

I don't know the lie of the land in ayrshire or the north but it is about debate to see if it can be made fairer

[frank-123]

m

[Rooster J. Cogburn]

If these sections were passed people would still complain.If it wasnae Denny and Camelon that were getting the criticism it would just be somehwere else-Greengairs,Coatbridge etc.

Regardless of Section boundary 90% of the folk in it will be in a worst position than somebody else-Just get on with

 

Why do we no all just have our own Sections??yours can be called Frank's Section,mines can be Lewis'Section,Novos can be Derek's section and we would all win our Section every week

 

As fer ma section instead of losing sleep about the boundary we'd be better trying to catch John McNeill

[Guest Gareth Rankin]

If these sections were passed people would still complain.If it wasnae Dennyloanhead and Camelon that were getting the criticism it would just be somehwere else-Greengairs,Coatbridge etc.

Regardless of Section boundary 90% of the folk in it will be in a worst position than somebody else-Just get on with

 

Why do we no all just have our own Sections??yours can be called Frank's Section,mines can be Lewis'Section,Novos can be Derek's section and we would all win our Section every week

 

As fer ma section instead of losing sleep about the boundary we'd be better trying to catch John McNeill

To a degree I have to agree with you Lewis but there members who have skipped to a more favorable section because some federations have boundaries like a Dundee hooker.

 

If these sections were passed people would still complain.If it wasnae Dennyloanhead and Camelon that were getting the criticism it would just be somehwere else-Greengairs,Coatbridge etc.

Regardless of Section boundary 90% of the folk in it will be in a worst position than somebody else-Just get on with

 

Why do we no all just have our own Sections??yours can be called Frank's Section,mines can be Lewis'Section,Novos can be Derek's section and we would all win our Section every week

 

As fer ma section instead of losing sleep about the boundary we'd be better trying to catch John McNeill

To a degree I have to agree with you Lewis but there members who have skipped to a more favorable section because some federations have slack boundaries like a Dundee hooker.

[geordie1234]

If these sections were passed people would still complain.If it wasnae Denny and Camelon that were getting the criticism it would just be somehwere else-Greengairs,Coatbridge etc.

Regardless of Section boundary 90% of the folk in it will be in a worst position than somebody else-Just get on with

 

Why do we no all just have our own Sections??yours can be called Frank's Section,mines can be Lewis'Section,Novos can be Derek's section and we would all win our Section every week

As fer ma section instead of losing sleep about the boundary we'd be better trying to catch John McNeill

 

Well im the best flyer in my back garden section defo

[frank-123]

If these sections were passed people would still complain.If it wasnae Denny and Camelon that were getting the criticism it would just be somehwere else-Greengairs,Coatbridge etc.

Regardless of Section boundary 90% of the folk in it will be in a worst position than somebody else-Just get on with

 

Why do we no all just have our own Sections??yours can be called Frank's Section,mines can be Lewis'Section,Novos can be Derek's section and we would all win our Section every week

 

As fer ma section instead of losing sleep about the boundary we'd be better trying to catch John McNeill

 

I don't have a problem competing with anyone but all I am saying is fauldhouse is closer to me it should be in section e where falkirk and it's surrounding area should be in section d that's my opinion

It should not be where you fly but where you live that determines what section you are in

[novo10]

I don't have a problem competing with anyone but all I am saying is fauldhouse is closer to me it should be in section e where falkirk and it's surrounding area should be in section d that's my opinion

It should not be where you fly but where you live that determines what section you are in

now ur talking frank get us in west section

[Rooster J. Cogburn]

now ur talking frank get us in west section

 

If yous are in a want in tae

[Guest WINGS 04]

I don't have a problem competing with anyone but all I am saying is fauldhouse is closer to me it should be in section e where falkirk and it's surrounding area should be in section d that's my opinion

It should not be where you fly but where you live that determines what section you are in

 

 

 

You are spot on frank

[dal2]

Wot about good old North/south/east/west???

[novo10]

If yous are in a want in tae

lewis you cannie ur in the north west lol