Jump to content

naedoos

Members
  • Posts

    976
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by naedoos

  1. Bold statement to make considering that yourself and your other SNRPC pal seem to be the only ones interested on continually bringing the subject up
  2. Did say I had a "spare" one but you're probably correct it'll get more use here. Your guys probably wouldn't know what it was anyway
  3. I agree it's not worth debating as it was never voted on to change it so could never be the status quo! It was a committee decision to change it due to circumstances. I'm sure I have a spare rule book, can maybe send it through, help you guys through there conduct your meetings properly
  4. Buckingham was never the status quo, it was only used as Billericay was not available for that race.
  5. naedoos

    Snrpc

    didn't know what?
  6. naedoos

    Snrpc

    With both parties having held a meeting on 2nd February to discuss this, then what you are saying is that the committee members from SNRPC made a decision without consulting the members first!! Hmmm, never thought that would happen at such a well run club. But maybe some of them already had their own plan/schemes also
  7. naedoos

    Snfc

    This already happens Stuart, for those that wish to do so
  8. Wouldn't say I'm way off the mark fella!!, just as you're entitled to stick to your rubbers then I'm entitled to keep using my ETS rings that I purchased for whatever I'm willing to pay for them, but I'm not about to complain about subsidising the folks that use rubbers.
  9. Personaly, if the rings were £50 each I'd still use them. Nobody forcing you to use them though, go back to the dark ages & rubber them. One less thing for ye tae moan about
  10. If your young birds are not worth £1.45, then maybe you shouldnae be breeding them
  11. Well done for clearing that up Archie, maybe save the goons from thinking there's a conspiracy Oh no, too late
  12. Firstly, I use Smash, you really should try it, it may suit you. Secondly, never missed an AGM so you can be rest assured there's no much chance o me missin an EGM, can you say the same I wonder?
  13. I gather with that statement you have all the answers, or you just want to listen to one side of the story so a meeting will be of no importance as your mind is already made up? How many others are the same way minded I wonder?
  14. It's not about what I deem suitable it's about this being a post about SNFC but you always have to include anything to mention SNRPC when it has nothing to do with the post
  15. Just a question, do you ever have anything good to say regarding the SNFC or do you just keep the good stuff (if any) for your beloved SNRPC?
  16. I'll maybe have to get a loan of your hearing aid in that case as I never heard anyone asking Mr Garven for an explanation. In saying that there was a bit of mayhem going on along from me so maybe I missed seeing that
  17. I'll refer you to IB's post. It's amazing what you hear when you sit and listen
  18. Doubt am no the only one that's blind then
  19. Think you caused some of this yourself John wi your outburst at the president, pot & kettle springs tae mind
  20. If the members making all the noise now are that incensed then why did they not have it on the agenda for the AGM?
  21. Only by suspicious people
  22. I'm sure they make what they deem to be the best decisions for the benefit of the club, just as it should be
  23. If that is the case then the EGM should have been 10 years ago. We have a committee of elected members to run the club, let them run it I say, they were all proposed and seconded at the AGM
  24. To achieve what?? Now there's a surprise
×
×
  • Create New...