ghostrider Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 Great British Empire is put to shame. Military service must be the only criteria for knighthood. Even homosexual Elton John is a knight. Pathetic!"The first military orders of knighthood were of Knights Hospitaller and of the Holy Sepulchre, both founded at the First Crusade of 1099, followed by the Order of Saint Lazarus (1100) Knights Templar (1118) and the Teutonic Knights (1190)."What's your views on this?
sandy25 Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 Well it seems you've got a decent grip on history .However it seems to me that modern knights depends only on how much tax they've paid over their lifetime .Crucial question is do you not like Rod Stewart hes brought a lot of people smiles and happiness and the best chat up line for years .."do you think I'm sexy " now who among us hasnt asked that of a wife girlfriend ? Christ man he deserves to be called Sir just for that .By the way if Rabbie Burns was alive today wouldnt it be SIR ROBERT BURNS .All the best
showman Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 Even homosexual Elton John is a knight. Pathetic! So is your openly homophobic attitude !! What a statement to make on an open forum.Take a look at the literally hundreds of millions of pounds / dollars Elton John has raised throughout his professional life. If the Laws of the Land dictates he is eligible for such an award, well fair play to him. Rod Stewarts' award is for his services to the Arts and charity. Good on ya mate. I'm sure all the charities you both support would add their humble thanks also.
Guest johnhunter Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 So is your openly homophobic attitude !! What a statement to make on an open forum.Take a look at the literally hundreds of millions of pounds / dollars Elton John has raised throughout his professional life. If the Laws of the Land dictates he is eligible for such an award, well fair play to him. Rod Stewarts' award is for his services to the Arts and charity. Good on ya mate. I'm sure all the charities you both support would add their humble thanks also.showman ,jimmy Saville made millions for charity, so is that ok also
showman Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 showman ,jimmy Saville made millions for charity, so is that ok also What on earth has Jimmy Saville got to do with this ?
sandy25 Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 Showman---If you read my post you will see I was commenting on and not agreeing with .dont tar me with that brush "both support " I resent that .and yes wtf has Saville got to do with Rod Stewart ?
showman Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 Showman---If you read my post you will see I was commenting on and not agreeing with .dont tar me with that brush "both support " I resent that .and yes wtf has Saville got to do with Rod Stewart ? What on earth are you talking about ?
sandy25 Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 You said "the charities you both support which tars me with his views you should have said "the charities you support "as you were replying to his post and his comments not mine .Ok that clear the air sandy
Guest johnhunter Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 What on earth has Jimmy Saville got to do with this ?the law of the land as you say dictated that Saville become a sir,all because he made millions for charity,the rest is history ,aye money does talk
showman Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 Ah. Can see the error ! If you take out the word YOU in the last line, and replace with THEY, does that remove any inference ?
Froog Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 You said "the charities you both support which tars me with his views you should have said "the charities you support "as you were replying to his post and his comments not mine .Ok that clear the air sandyI think he meant the charities that Elton and Rod support
showman Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 I think he meant the charities that Elton and Rod supportCorrect !!
Froog Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 Correct !!Do you have Dordins? ...bit off subject I know but saw the bit at the foot of your post
sandy25 Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 I stand in the corner corrected what a f up sandy .
Froog Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 Indeed I do.Do you race them? or show them? best pigeons I ever had many yearsago, not only good racers, but best looking racers I ever saw
showman Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 Do you race them? or show them? best pigeons I ever had many yearsago, not only good racers, but best looking racers I ever sawWill PM you !
VMS Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 Showman---If you read my post you will see I was commenting on and not agreeing with .dont tar me with that brush "both support " I resent that .and yes wtf has Saville got to do with Rod Stewart ?Only conection that i can see is that both were/are good Celtic supporters
sandy25 Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 Ah. Can see the error ! If you take out the word YOU in the last line, and replace with THEY, does that remove any inference ?Didnt see this post yes it does so I can get out of the cold dark corner now vindicated all the best sandy
Kyleakin Lofts Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 I have my doubts about the greatness of the British Empire since most of the countries, let alone the peoples, were raped in a sense by the British invaders, however the sentiment of a knighthood being a military honour rings true to a point.For quite some time, a knighthood has been bestowed for non-military reasons. It remains, nevertheless, an honour.Even in the days when it was bestowed for military purposes, it was at times incorrectly bestowed and "wrong uns" received it. There is always room for a "wrong un" to receive it in modern times, this, however, does not alter the fact that it is an honour.
Froog Posted October 12, 2016 Report Posted October 12, 2016 I have my doubts about the greatness of the British Empire since most of the countries, let alone the peoples, were raped in a sense by the British invaders, however the sentiment of a knighthood being a military honour rings true to a point.For quite some time, a knighthood has been bestowed for non-military reasons. It remains, nevertheless, an honour.Even in the days when it was bestowed for military purposes, it was at times incorrectly bestowed and "wrong uns" received it. There is always room for a "wrong un" to receive it in modern times, this, however, does not alter the fact that it is an honour. I agree,none should be knighted for killing, apart from maybe bravery in the 2 WWs, and certainly not given to friends of politicians,the most corrupt of our society.
Valiant Fifer Posted October 13, 2016 Report Posted October 13, 2016 Good point m8 think their given out far too easily to some that are already in a fortunate position.
Walter swanston Posted October 13, 2016 Report Posted October 13, 2016 The honours system is abslute phoney crap anybody with sense of decency would decline this spurious honour
Walter swanston Posted October 13, 2016 Report Posted October 13, 2016 Google it up and you will find a whole bunch of prominent persons who have declined.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now