DJWa Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 OLD BIRDS23/4 - THORNTON30/4 - ARNISTON7/5 - LAUDER14/5 - CONSETT21/5 - RIPON28/5 - ROTHERHAM4/6 - WORKSOP11/6 - RIPON18/6 - PETERBURGH25/6 - ARNISTON2/7 - YPRES15/7 - ROYE Y/BS16/7 - ARBROATH23/7 - THORNTON30/7 - THORNTON6/8 - ARNISTON13/8 - ARNISTON20/8 - BERWICK ON TWEED27/8 - CONSETT3/9 - RIPON
cemetary Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 Yous guys like the old Thornton race point eh, :o
Jumbo Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 Davie are you sure we're going to Clermont on the 15th July as the National are at Roye that day ???
cemetary Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 Davie are you sure we're going to Clermont on the 15th July as the National are at Roye that day ??? Maybe a double dunter Jim.
DJWa Posted February 9, 2016 Author Report Posted February 9, 2016 Davie are you sure we're going to Clermont on the 15th July as the National are at Roye that day ??? that was what was discussed jim but if the nationals going to roye then that will be where we are going m8 will change it
Williedoo Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 What i would like to know is (1) why does the Fed want to waist money onpaying for all the members distances for Berwick when it is exactly the samedistance as Arnison which is 97 miles.(2) why did the race committee want to have 3 races one after the other at97 miles and then jump the young birds 63 miles to Consett 160 miles.Or is it that the race committee have no idea how far these race points areto Aberdeen.
Ian McKay Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 What i would like to know is (1) why does the Fed want to waist money onpaying for all the members distances for Berwick when it is exactly the samedistance as Arnison which 97 miles.(2) why did the race committee want to have 3 races one after the other at97 miles and then jump the young birds 63 miles to Consett 160 miles.Or is it that the race committee have no idea how far these race points areto Aberdeen. :emoticon-0136-giggle: :emoticon-0136-giggle:
KEVIN ELLIOTT Posted February 9, 2016 Report Posted February 9, 2016 WELL I DID SAY THIS WAS CRAP PROGRAM :emoticon-0179-headbang:
DJWa Posted February 10, 2016 Author Report Posted February 10, 2016 WELL I DID SAY THIS WAS CRAP PROGRAM :emoticon-0179-headbang: apart from thornton and lauder on the old birds its exactly as you voted for in the club the y/b program is near enough the same as last year only change to racepoints is Berwick in for alnwick
DJWa Posted February 10, 2016 Author Report Posted February 10, 2016 What i would like to know is (1) why does the Fed want to waist money onpaying for all the members distances for Berwick when it is exactly the samedistance as Arnison which is 97 miles.(2) why did the race committee want to have 3 races one after the other at97 miles and then jump the young birds 63 miles to Consett 160 miles.Or is it that the race committee have no idea how far these race points areto Aberdeen. you could say the same for thornton and arniston only 8 or 9 miles apart on near the same line and we have normally 4 races from there every year in y/bsberwicks the same distance but a diff line after 4 or 5 races at around 100 miles do you not think they can manage a 63 mile jumpand consett to ripons a 50 mile jump which they do near every year if you send to snfc ybn that's a 150 mile jump ps- it wasn't down to the race committee, they were instructed by their clubs how to vote, most of them had a race program from their clubs in front of them
Williedoo Posted February 10, 2016 Report Posted February 10, 2016 you could say the same for thornton and arniston only 8 or 9 miles apart on near the same line and we have normally 4 races from there every year in y/bsberwicks the same distance but a diff line after 4 or 5 races at around 100 miles do you not think they can manage a 63 mile jumpand consett to ripons a 50 mile jump which they do near every year if you send to snfc ybn that's a 150 mile jump ps- it wasn't down to the race committee, they were instructed by their clubs how to vote, most of them had a race program from their clubs in front of them
KEVIN ELLIOTT Posted February 10, 2016 Report Posted February 10, 2016 DAVIE I DID NOT VOTE WHAT I DID DO WAS TO WISH YOU THE BEST OF LUCK AND SO DID IAN MCKAY THE YB RACE PROGRAM NO THOUGHT PUT IN AT ALL HAVING 2 THORNTONS WHERE WE HAD ARBROATH THORNTON THEN ARNISTON THEN THORNTON ARNISTON AND SO ON THE REASON MOST ARE UNHAPPY ABOUT IS GOING ARBROTH THORNTON THORNTON AND SO ON WHAT ABOUT 2ND 3RD ROUND YBS AND I THOUGHT THAY WERE GOING TO LOOK AND SEEWHAT ALTERNITIVE THERE WAS INSTED OF THORNTON I AM NOT BOTHERD I WILL SEND MY BIRDS WHEN I LIKE AND IF I LIKE AS I HAVE ALWAYS HAVE DONE THIS IS NOT ME HAVING A GO AT YOU DAVIE
Williedoo Posted February 10, 2016 Report Posted February 10, 2016 Well there was no time for my club to have a meeting as the Fed only gave one weeksnotice that their was going to be one. The Fed in my opinion should have given the clubsecretaries 2 weeks notice so that they could arrange a club meeting with a weeks notice to their members.I discussed the above with my club President Alex Rae and between us decided as there was no time to call a meeting to go along the lines of last years programme with the exception of finding a new race point to replace Alnwick.Did the club or clubs that were lucky enough to have had a meeting so that their memberscould make up a race programme and had Berwick in it give the rest of the race committee the reason for their choice and its distance from Aberdeen.If they did i personally think the race committee should be done away with and the raceprogramme decided at the AGM.
DJWa Posted February 10, 2016 Author Report Posted February 10, 2016 Well there was no time for my club to have a meeting as the Fed only gave one weeksnotice that their was going to be one. The Fed in my opinion should have given the clubsecretaries 2 weeks notice so that they could arrange a club meeting with a weeks notice to their members.I discussed the above with my club President Alex Rae and between us decided as there was no time to call a meeting to go along the lines of last years programme with the exception of finding a new race point to replace Alnwick.Did the club or clubs that were lucky enough to have had a meeting so that their memberscould make up a race programme and had Berwick in it give the rest of the race committee the reason for their choice and its distance from Aberdeen.If they did i personally think the race committee should be done away with and the raceprogramme decided at the AGM.willie the concencus was to stay away from Alnwickthat went along with the direction I got from my clubberwick was an option as were some other race points further inland st boswells/kelso etc etc but we have had some disasters out of them in the pastfife used kelso but changed due to the really heavy losses im told my club instructon for both programs was to keep away from thornton and Alnwick
Williedoo Posted February 10, 2016 Report Posted February 10, 2016 willie the concencus was to stay away from Alnwickthat went along with the direction I got from my clubberwick was an option as were some other race points further inland st boswells/kelso etc etc but we have had some disasters out of them in the pastfife used kelso but changed due to the really heavy losses im told my club instructon for both programs was to keep away from thornton and Alnwick Berwick is nearly the same line as Alnwick and right on the coast and exactly thesame distance as Arniston which has been tried and tested by us for years.So why did the race committee choose Berwick, a name plucked out of thin air i thinkwith out any discussion of where it is or how far.
DJWa Posted February 10, 2016 Author Report Posted February 10, 2016 Berwick is nearly the same line as Alnwick and right on the coast and exactly thesame distance as Arniston which has been tried and tested by us for years.So why did the race committee choose Berwick, a name plucked out of thin air i thinkwith out any discussion of where it is or how far. I will say it again THE CLUBS DECIDED THE PROGRAM the race committee just voted on their behalf on their instruction as I said before that most clubs attended with race programs written out silver citymastrickcentral don't remember if the district had a written out program but they did have a meeting before the race committee meeting
BLACK W F Posted February 10, 2016 Report Posted February 10, 2016 what race points are u guys going to with the north fed transporter
DJWa Posted February 10, 2016 Author Report Posted February 10, 2016 what race points are u guys going to with the north fed transporter worksop and peterburgh alan
BLACK W F Posted February 10, 2016 Report Posted February 10, 2016 worksop and peterburgh alanonly 2 thought u guys where trying to cut costs
Williedoo Posted February 10, 2016 Report Posted February 10, 2016 I will say it again THE CLUBS DECIDED THE PROGRAM the race committee just voted on their behalf on their instruction as I said before that most clubs attended with race programs written out silver citymastrickcentral don't remember if the district had a written out program but they did have a meeting before the race committee meetingWell the clubs that put Berwick forward as a race point and theremust have been more than one or it would have been the Race Committeesdecision, in my opinion put no thought into their choice,as i said before pluckedout of thin air.
cemetary Posted February 10, 2016 Report Posted February 10, 2016 Why cant yous guys try and liberate from Leven caravan site. Its right on the waters edge, but wide open, and am sure you would get a good race from there, and also returns. Yous go to Thornton every year, and without FAIL, don't seem to get a good race or good returns, But at the end of the day, that's pigeon racing for you, either vote for this, or would like to go here or there.
cemetary Posted February 10, 2016 Report Posted February 10, 2016 WELL I DID SAY THIS WAS CRAP PROGRAM :emoticon-0179-headbang: Well Kevin, you should have voted, no good on greeting about it know. Everybody has the chance to vote on certain things, and when it dosent suit them, that's when the hanky's come out. Its pigeon live just know, too many people GREETING.
KEVIN ELLIOTT Posted February 10, 2016 Report Posted February 10, 2016 WELL WHAT IS THE POINT THE RACE PROGRAM IS MADE UP BY THE RACE COMMITTE ITS UP TO THEM WHARE WE GO THE MEMBERS IN MY CLUB ASKED FOR THORNTON TO BE REMOVED LIKE YOU SAID BAD RACE POINT BUT WHATS THE USE THAY STILL GO NO MATTER WHAT SOME MEMBERS ALSO THINK THAT THE PROGRAM IS MADE UP BEFORE THAY EVEN GO TO THE MEETING AND IF THAY ARE HONEST THAY SHOULD STAND UP AND BE COUNTED NOT HIDE AWAY AND GREET ABOUT IT ANYWAY I ANT BOTHERD WHARE THAY WANT TO RACE FROM I SEND WHEN I WANT AND IF I WANT I THINK THE RACE PROGRAM SHOULD BE PUT BACK THE WAY WE USED TO DO IT AT THE AGM SO IT CAN BE THRASHED OUT AND WHATS MADE UP IS WHAT THE MEMBERS WANT NOT TO BE TOLD BY THE RACE COMMITTE AS SOME THAT GO TO THESE MEETINGS DO NOT GET PAST THE FIRST THREE RACES OLD BIRDS AND YOUNG BIRD RACEING BUT THIS IS WHAT WE ARE UP AGENST
Valiant Fifer Posted February 11, 2016 Report Posted February 11, 2016 Some feds are down to 5/6 yb races in their programme, why do Aberdeen need about 8 races for their yb's.
philg50 Posted February 11, 2016 Report Posted February 11, 2016 I am nay sure mine but in my opinion i think the young birds are raced like this to give them flying time to get them ready and strong enough for young bird national ,same as North o Scotland Fed ,you need tay mine its a fair hike above you lads for the bird tae make hame,maybe im wrong :unsure:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now