billt Posted June 13, 2015 Report Posted June 13, 2015 Standing in front of the keeper! He was offside from the header. If that header had gone in ....goal as it didn't walters became active and hence offside. As an unbiased observer I'm with the officials on this one
Blue Tooner Posted June 13, 2015 Report Posted June 13, 2015 Standing in front of the keeper! He was offside from the header. If that header had gone in ....goal as it didn't walters became active and hence offside. 100% correct..
andy Burgess Posted June 13, 2015 Report Posted June 13, 2015 Well done the Jocks, :emoticon-0167-beer: Hawe you, hawed yir weesht [/quote was hoping for deportation to Jamaica
Delboy Posted June 13, 2015 Report Posted June 13, 2015 As an biased observer I'm with the officials on this one
Blue Chequer Pied Posted June 13, 2015 Report Posted June 13, 2015 As an unbiased observer I'm with the officials on this one Lol
yeboah Posted June 13, 2015 Report Posted June 13, 2015 What is the point of having a 4th official on the goal line if he is unwilling to participate in simple straight forward game changing decisions And here were we thinking the days of Blatter and co were well and truly finished But on the other hand we were playing a team that had already accepted a multi million pound Bung Strange But a True
eastcoaster Posted June 13, 2015 Report Posted June 13, 2015 Cheers,Never was an official been closer and made no decision the man should be rejected from the system , and why has the refs spray been rejected by the officials for free kicks must be one of best inventions out .jmo
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now