Guest Posted July 17, 2007 Report Posted July 17, 2007 But it is a very unfortunate way to remind to the rest of us, thro another's misfortune, to get the clock back to the station within period stipulated. Surely a rule alteration needed to take account of modern clocks with 'day' indicator??
Roland Posted July 17, 2007 Report Posted July 17, 2007 I believe there is in most cases a Timer that say 'Clock Control' at days end, which means that it starts the next day clear. This was mainly for the Pricked clocks, but as most printers don't have this problem, then in most clubs this is just ignored, unless you have a Pricked paper clock of course. Personally I would want that prize knowing two birds beat me, and certainly not of a ruling that today has no merit. A court of law would quickly overturn that decision you can wager on. And just who was the 'Do Gooder' that sprung this crap eh! Must be real proud person I bet now. But still head down eh and mutter 'Rules are Rules, and as the Lord of the flies say B8887cks' to the rules. The race concerned wasn't Tours, the matter has been dealt with accordinly and is now closed, end off Nah too much bad taste in many mouths Chris for that I'd wager. Bu if Ken isn't fuzzed - but I bet he is more than a little miffed and quite rightly so if that was the ruling - then it will be glossed over, but never forgotten I' wager.
Guest Posted July 17, 2007 Report Posted July 17, 2007 Johno, thank you for the courteos reply, that clears up the matter in terms of what happened. I have no doubt of Mr Buchanan's integrity but the way the lid was tried to put on it was silly.
pender Posted July 18, 2007 Report Posted July 18, 2007 yes lets do away with all rules roland and just do as we want, we can cheat wen we want to what about it. you muppet. it unfortunate what happend to kenny, the part that gets me is the objections, someone trying to gain out anothers misfortune. i may not have had a lot of big results but wen i had a decent one the first thing i did was get clock run of as soon as possible. one does not no what can happen it could stop or anything. at least this nat club has stood by there rules even wen it does hurt someone, unlike another nat club i could mention.
Roland Posted July 18, 2007 Report Posted July 18, 2007 What a silly little twerp you have proved to be pender. And well you know it!!! Must be near the truth and put your nose out of place eh! First off grow up, secondly learn to read proper, and then look at the 1000's of 'Laws' broken every day oin all walks of life because they are useless and antquated. And as for Cheating where dig you pull that from! you plonker! For instance how does not applying an out of date rule allow the whole sport of 'Pigeondom' to be cheaters. -My name is Roland not pender the bender and I don't cheat, and no wish too like the 46000 other fanciers that believe that when a law is obsolete it should be struck of. And I'd wager that EVERY club nigh has these laws of past that are not been revoked, or voted on to be recinded. Yours included bender. Next to you spout Pender look in the mirror and A. wipe the brown of you mouth, and B. the brown off your nose! Because that was absolute CRAP!
dandydoo Posted July 18, 2007 Report Posted July 18, 2007 So do you honour the rule or not aw naw now the RPRA rules are not good enough ....if yous had ETS wouldny be a problem eh ...So what union governs the SNRPC then or now
Roland Posted July 18, 2007 Report Posted July 18, 2007 Yes the RPRA rules state clearly that ONLY the Old Toulets that were Pricked need to be clock controlled. Any printer doesn't as it automatically puts the new date up at 12 Midnight! So Ken wouldn't have been disqualified, and further must have grounds of appeal if he wasn't using he old Toulette. No club rule can supercede / override the governing bodies. hat's a fact, so pender that must mean we can all cheat eh!
HOMER49 Posted July 18, 2007 Author Report Posted July 18, 2007 Yes the RPRA rules state clearly that ONLY the Old Toulets that were Pricked need to be clock controlled. Any printer doesn't as it automatically puts the new date up at 12 Midnight! So Ken wouldn't have been disqualified, and further must have grounds of appeal if he wasn't using he old Toulette. No club rule can supercede / override the governing bodies. hat's a fact, so pender that must mean we can all cheat eh! Hi Roland Think you have the wrong end of the stick Nothing to do with clock control but clock was not in clocksetters hands within 23 hours of timing first bird Not being a member of RPRA how long after timing does your clock have to be in the clocksetters hands by Cheers Homer 49
Guest Posted July 18, 2007 Report Posted July 18, 2007 Hi Roland Think you have the wrong end of the stick Nothing to do with clock control but clock was not in clocksetters hands within 23 hours of timing first bird Not being a member of RPRA how long after timing does your clock have to be in the clocksetters hands by Cheers Homer 49 Think Roland was replying to my post on possible reason for 23 hour rule goes back to the Toulet puncture clock has no dolometer and doesn't register day / date of timing? Still wondered how that rule fits in with scheduled hours of clock reading meetings?
me Posted July 18, 2007 Report Posted July 18, 2007 So do you honour the rule or not aw naw now the RPRA rules are not good enough ....if yous had ETS wouldny be a problem eh ...So what union governs the SNRPC then or now Don't no who rattled your cage but this garbage is not required.
Guest Posted July 18, 2007 Report Posted July 18, 2007 Don't no who rattled your cage but this garbage is not required. just love it when you come on ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
me Posted July 18, 2007 Report Posted July 18, 2007 Hi bart My source in the SNRPC now tells me there was a objection to his first 2 pigeons The plot thickens I will bet Kens not amused Cheers Homer49 Homer lad your talents are wasted on here why not contact the producers of Coronation Street I hear Ena Sharples deid and they are looking for a replacement!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111
HOMER49 Posted July 18, 2007 Author Report Posted July 18, 2007 Homer lad your talents are wasted on here why not contact the producers of Coronation Street I hear Ena Sharples deid and they are looking for a replacement!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 Hi me Thanks always wanted a fan club By the way its Died Heard the 2 objectors are South Lanarkshires finest whatever Cheers Homer 49
me Posted July 18, 2007 Report Posted July 18, 2007 Hi me Thanks always wanted a fan club By the way its Died Heard the 2 objectors are South Lanarkshires finest whatever Cheers Homer 49 Naw its deid if your scottish as in "a lang time" no interested in whatever one of the "coalburn five" told you about the objectors. All I know is if they have to look themselves in the mirror!
Guest Posted July 18, 2007 Report Posted July 18, 2007 Hi me Thanks always wanted a fan club Cheers Homer 49 'Me' will lend you her hairnet. ;D
HOMER49 Posted July 18, 2007 Author Report Posted July 18, 2007 Naw its deid if your scottish as in "a lang time" no interested in whatever one of the "coalburn five" told you about the objectors. All I know is if they have to look themselves in the mirror! Hi me No its died using the Queens English BOY LATEST 2 members from the Gow (Lesmahagow) have joined Lanark & District Cheers Homer 49
HOMER49 Posted July 18, 2007 Author Report Posted July 18, 2007 'Me' will lend you her hairnet. ;D Hi bruno Your to late Cheers Homer 49
johno Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 there was only one objector who put in a written objection. unfortunately only one other member was identified by the objector as having breached the twenty three hour rule in search for "justice" undertaken by the objector. i am curious to know if there would have an objection asking for the rule to be applied accross the board would there have been any more pigeons who excelled in the race needing to be removed from the result. the information available would lead one to believe that enforcing the rule to achieve fairness and maintain integrity was the last thing on the objectors mind. why was only one member identitfied by the objector when it could well have been the case that other pigeons may have fallen into the same category?
Guest Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 just wonder what mr buchanan would say if he knew what was going on here under his name ,personally if it was me i wouldbe none tohappy about it ;)
pender Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 no roland it people like you, that wastes any form of sport, if laws of the game are old and out of date you have a.g.m. every year to change them, it muppets like you that do all the shouting and then come the day of action you in the house with the knitting hiding. and maybe thats why the world in a mess with muppets like you going around breaking all the rules moral or otherwise..
johno Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 dandydoo why are you obsessed with attacking other organisation not under shu rules. you are very aggresive towards anything or anyone who asks questions. you seem very obsessed. i do not know why.
Roland Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 no roland it people like you, that wastes any form of sport, if laws of the game are old and out of date you have a.g.m. every year to change them, it muppets like you that do all the shouting and then come the day of action you in the house with the knitting hiding. and maybe thats why the world in a mess with muppets like you going around breaking all the rules moral or otherwise.. Pender do you actually have any inkling what you are on about! I doubt it very much, just a load of twaddle. And certainly nonsensical at that! AGM'S aren't the only meetings that can change rules etc. However THAT Rule has been rescinded by the RPRA. There are many others that need to be. And most are already obsolete in 'Law' but are bought up because it serves a purpose. Likewise I don't know the SHU etc. Rules, but it may very well be that that very rule has become obsolete. Any Practise that is carried out over a short period of time in essences changes the old rule, or becomes a rule. But you wouldn't even be able to understand that! So as you are very bright, I'll let this correspondence cease s it will only be like banging my head against the wall.... which is nice when you stop, but I am above that twaddle and tilly tally rubbish you wish to spout ... especially as you don't even know what you want to spout, or say, and certain not anything sensible and worthwhile.
Roland Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 Dont think down here that there is any rpra rule that states when a clock has to be opened by its usually covered by fed club rules i know our club has a rule saying Clocks must be opened and checked on the day of timing in Can do it over the phone now too Rose, but have been in two clubs when I had birds real late 9. 50 and 10. 11. I had to clock control my clock - it was Pin *expletive removed* toulette - and meet the next day at club for clock readings.
Roland Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 Correct Rose, but no club rule can supercede a RPRA rule obviously. That does take a Regional debate and pass etc. first. But any club can make a rule that doesn't contravene the hier archy , and likewise no RPRA rule etc. could go against the 'Law of the Land'.
rembrant2coo Posted July 19, 2007 Report Posted July 19, 2007 just wonder what mr buchanan would say if he knew what was going on here under his name ,personally if it was me i wouldbe none tohappy about it ;) I AGREE WITH YOU ENTIRELY SAMMY
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now