Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This morning there are two or it might be three transporters at the same race point on the South coast of England.Those vehicles are at half or maybe quarter capacity.For many years I have expounded the view that there should be more cooperation between Federations so as to resolve this apparently wasteful situation.I have now began to change my mind over this as the transport authorities (I am not sure of their correct)name have more or less agreed to turn a blind eye to any requirement for pigeon organisations to require an operators licence, use a tachograph or restrict driver's hours on the reasonable grounds that a pigeon Federation is not a commercial profit seeking outfit.However.should a Federation agree to convey another organisation's birds and charge a fee for doing so it could be claimed that the Federation is operating for hire or reward and thus lose the protection previously enjoyed.Do other site members have an opinion on this?

Posted

No chance of joint convoying when cumbria and solway refused to lib at the same time as lanarkshire this morning

 

Wisnae Solway George, think Raymond White was all for it, IT WAS OTHERS WHO REJECTED THE JOINT LIB.

Posted

Wisnae Solway George, think Raymond White was all for it, IT WAS OTHERS WHO REJECTED THE JOINT LIB.

Yes he was up for it and the powers above blocked it...canny mind the cumbria guys name that was mentioned

Posted

This morning there are two or it might be three transporters at the same race point on the South coast of England.Those vehicles are at half or maybe quarter capacity.For many years I have expounded the view that there should be more cooperation between Federations so as to resolve this apparently wasteful situation.I have now began to change my mind over this as the transport authorities (I am not sure of their correct)name have more or less agreed to turn a blind eye to any requirement for pigeon organisations to require an operators licence, use a tachograph or restrict driver's hours on the reasonable grounds that a pigeon Federation is not a commercial profit seeking outfit.However.should a Federation agree to convey another organisation's birds and charge a fee for doing so it could be claimed that the Federation is operating for hire or reward and thus lose the protection previously enjoyed.Do other site members have an opinion on this?

If it were to be a joint liberation where all birds are competing against each other (an open) you could argue your not conveying another fed for hire or reward.

Posted

Was it Buchanan George??

Canny mind mate it was half five this morning in davies hoose we were collecting doos for a toss... I was half asleep

 

Ps. I saw first hand what work davy puts in the phone was never away from his ear

Posted

Canny mind mate it was half five this morning in davies hoose we were collecting doos for a toss... I was half asleep

 

Ps. I saw first hand what work davy puts in the phone was never away from his ear

 

Aye he was on the phone for 4 hours solid last night trying to get agreement on joint lib, also talking to other organisations about their lib times etc, trying to limit as far as is possible any clashing en route. He puts the same work in every week too trying to secure good racing for us.

Posted

Surely the decision to liberate with another organisation

should be taken before the race not at the race point.

It would have suited me for it to have been a Fed race

with each Fed taken part,but too many people thinking

of their self and not the Sport. jmo

Posted

We've tried for a lot of years to get Derwent Valley and West Cumbria to liberate together. NFC and that doesn't mean National flying club.It's just now when thing's have gone tits up that they have formed a Two Feds Amal.and there's still some not happy.

Good to see fanciers letting each other know what's going on.

Lindsay C.

Posted

This morning there are two or it might be three transporters at the same race point on the South coast of England.Those vehicles are at half or maybe quarter capacity.For many years I have expounded the view that there should be more cooperation between Federations so as to resolve this apparently wasteful situation.I have now began to change my mind over this as the transport authorities (I am not sure of their correct)name have more or less agreed to turn a blind eye to any requirement for pigeon organisations to require an operators licence, use a tachograph or restrict driver's hours on the reasonable grounds that a pigeon Federation is not a commercial profit seeking outfit.However.should a Federation agree to convey another organisation's birds and charge a fee for doing so it could be claimed that the Federation is operating for hire or reward and thus lose the protection previously enjoyed.Do other site members have an opinion on this?

If they seek payment from any other club or fed then they need opp licence even if it is small amount to help with fuel etc

Posted

Wisnae Solway George, think Raymond White was all for it, IT WAS OTHERS WHO REJECTED THE JOINT LIB.

A shower of fekkin children why don't they grow up an see the benefits joint convoying would

Bring, no wonder our sport / hobby is dying a death.

Posted

This has been the big prob. For years as said all that should have been arranged before a bird went on the transporter every controller wants what's best for his fed and wee go on about liberating some birds and not others from a vech. Yet when u get to the likes of Maidstone wee know the transporters can be just feet apart and birds liberated so where's the difference yes I agree it's best all to go together but that's pigeon fanciers for you

Posted

No chance of joint convoying when cumbria and solway refused to lib at the same time as lanarkshire this morning

 

Had it been Fife,Dundee.Angus&Aberdeen federations at the same race point as Lanarkshire,would you still be wanting a joint liberation.? dont think so.......JBC/..

Posted

Had it been Fife,Dundee.Angus&Aberdeen federations at the same race point as Lanarkshire,would you still be wanting a joint liberation.? dont think so.......JBC/..

 

 

Cumbria and solway flying in the same direction from Bedhampton thats the difference

Posted

Bit of a daft point mate

 

Cumbria and solway flying in the same direction from Bedhampton thats the difference

 

I believe the difference is that Lanarkshire federation was the furthest north,no chance of their birds following the drag past,like the possibility that Solway and Cumbria birds may have done,I.M.O......JBC/..

Posted

happened with us ate the last two old bird races from Newark and peterbro its pathetic the birds have no idea about the petty sqabbles of idiots

Who the fcks the idiot's,u dae ur thing and we will do our thing our members have no problems with liberating our selves end of.

Posted

Gentlemen, this post is NOT about the advantages and disadvantages of joint convoying and liberating.It is about keeping within the regulations relating to our vehicles while on the road should our drivers encounter an over zealous law enforcement officer or even worse be involved in an accident which attracts the attention of the authorities .Either of these scenarios could result in a substantial fine for Federations.

Posted

This morning there are two or it might be three transporters at the same race point on the South coast of England.Those vehicles are at half or maybe quarter capacity.For many years I have expounded the view that there should be more cooperation between Federations so as to resolve this apparently wasteful situation.I have now began to change my mind over this as the transport authorities (I am not sure of their correct)name have more or less agreed to turn a blind eye to any requirement for pigeon organisations to require an operators licence, use a tachograph or restrict driver's hours on the reasonable grounds that a pigeon Federation is not a commercial profit seeking outfit.However.should a Federation agree to convey another organisation's birds and charge a fee for doing so it could be claimed that the Federation is operating for hire or reward and thus lose the protection previously enjoyed.Do other site members have an opinion on this?

 

Walter their should not be a problem where the entire birdage on a transporter is divided by all the costs involved, ie, Fuel, Convoyer/Driver, Ferrying etc. An example is the transporter has 4365 birds on board and the total race costs are £657 equating to 15 Pence per pigeon. Individual accounts are then sent to Federations Sec's for payment. Their is no operating for hire or reward therefore tachographs or operators license is not required. I worked this situation when Fed Sec and joint convoyed other Feds whenever posible to the satisfaction of all concerned.

Posted

OK that seems reasonable enough Peter but I am still not so sure.A transporter is the property of a number of pigeon fanciers banded together in a Federation to pursue their joint hobby/sport of racing pigeons and as such does not attract the attention of the authorities.However if one crate of pigeons is on that vehicle which is not owned by the Federation members this has a fundamental change in the operation

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advert: Morray Firth One Loft Classic
  • Advert: M.A.C. Lofts Pigeon Products
  • Advert: RV Woodcraft
  • Advert: B.Leefe & Sons
  • Advert: Apex Garden Buildings
  • Advert: Racing Pigeon Supplies
  • Advert: Solway Feeders


×
×
  • Create New...