weecunny Posted January 15, 2009 Report Posted January 15, 2009 well then who on here wants ther jobs
Ian McKay Posted January 15, 2009 Report Posted January 15, 2009 well then who on here wants ther jobs You will kill the post with that Question lol ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
PATTY BHOY Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 why waste good space talking about this CHEAT. :B :B :B :B
rembrant2coo Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 why waste good space talking about this CHEAT. :B :B :B :B well patty you have used up 4 pages , and thats a lot of space
Guest Gareth Rankin Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 Wrong. I gave you a clue, that it was one of your peers, a well known and respected SNFC member. In the spirit of the person to whom this thread belongs, I won’t name names, but you’ll find him in Constitution & Rules, New Rules, 1, where 3 fanciers gave views on this. He is the second named person. He might be one of your peers and if so best of luck, but one thing for sure he is not someone who i see as one of my peers. And is it not a coincidence that he just so happens to be a close friend of the man we are talking about on this thread.
Guest IB Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 He might be one of your peers and if so best of luck, but one thing for sure he is not someone who i see as one of my peers. And is it not a coincidence that he just so happens to be a close friend of the man we are talking about on this thread. No offence, Gareth, but the main reason you are able to say what you have been saying about this man is that you are quote 'a well respected member of the SNFC' which you have used repeatedly to lend credibility to your posts. Ordinary people like me who post anything which calls these posts into question are immediately jumped upon by you and your friends as nobodies, bad for the sport, or friends of this man, in my case all three and more. I posted that one of your peers, also a well respected member of the SNFC, who by your own standards must command equal credibility, was heard by me saying (and in summary it's recorded in that AGM's minutes), that what you wanted done (re-rubber one mans birds) was victimisation. You have dismissed his opinion 'because he is a close friend of this man'. Another case of only what you and your friends say about this matter counts. Judge, Jury and Executioner rolled into one?
jock3 Posted January 16, 2009 Author Report Posted January 16, 2009 its time for change out with old and in with new ,and lets put this behind us , and promote the snfc
Guest redwhiteblue Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 its time for change out with old and in with new ,and lets put this behind us , and promote the snfc hi mate are you referring this to everyone who's involved in the snfc from the president right down to the race control team and race conveyors including all the committee in my opinion the full lot should go
Guest Gareth Rankin Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 No offence, Gareth, but the main reason you are able to say what you have been saying about this man is that you are quote 'a well respected member of the SNFC' which you have used repeatedly to lend credibility to your posts. Like you I am entitled to my opinion, the other members of the sport/forum will judge for themselves after everything is taken into consideration but even after they have posted on the thread you are still contrary even after everyone has voiced there opinion’s. Some are even the same fanciers that you have quoted as hounding the man out of the sport. As for using my credibility, it is something I do not take likely and as such I would rather not post anything on this site but when it comes to conmen in the sport, I will not hide and will give my point of view especially if someone is promoting someone I feel is an evil in the sport. Hopefully we can look forward to a new dawning of the SNFC tomorrow, it is the AGM and hopefully these posts that "I" "you" and "others" have contributed too will be a distant memory and then the members that have a love of the club will talk about the many positives within the club which at present is very hard to do. Ordinary people like me who post anything which calls these posts into question are immediately jumped upon by you and your friends as nobodies, bad for the sport, or friends of this man, in my case all three and more. Again your opinion I posted that one of your peers, also a well respected member of the SNFC, who by your own standards must command equal credibility, was heard by me saying (and in summary it's recorded in that AGM's minutes), that what you wanted done (re-rubber one mans birds) was victimisation. You have dismissed his opinion 'because he is a close friend of this man'. Another case of only what you and your friends say about this matter counts. Judge, Jury and Executioner rolled into one?ne who i see as one of my peers. And is it not a coincidence that he just so happens to be a close friend of the man we are talking about on this thread. He is entitled to his opinion as everyone is, but I dont have to agree with what I believe is a nonsense and a cop-out and one which the members could one day regret. And as a committee member at that time there was no victimisation, it was only a fancier/committee man concerned with the Heart of the SNFC, Past, Present and Future.
Delboy Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 hi mate are you referring this to everyone who's involved in the snfc from the president right down to the race control team and race conveyors including all the committee in my opinion the full lot should go The convoyer must be replaced, my opinion
jock3 Posted January 16, 2009 Author Report Posted January 16, 2009 no not every one should go ,you try and keep the best of them ,sec job not up for election
wee ecky Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 HOW MANY SCOTTISH NATIONAL DIPLOMAS HAVE BEEN WON IN THE ALMOND VALLEY FED IN THE LAST 2 YEARS ?
jock3 Posted January 16, 2009 Author Report Posted January 16, 2009 wee ecky and how many nat tickets are genuine from ur station ?. ;D ;D ;D
Guest redwhiteblue Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 message for ib and his supporters the man was caught cheating with 3 fanciers from your area, a blind man can see that the sport is dying when guys like yourself and the cheat we can do without can't wait until tomorrow to see more of his supporters leaving
Guest Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 What is the best you could hope for to-morow jock 3
hotrod Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 going with the feeling on here i think it will be rather heated .
nogin Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 going with the feeling on here i think it will be rather heated . HAND BAGS AT DAWN ;D ;D ;D ;D
hotrod Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 HAND BAGS AT DAWN ;D ;D ;D ;D going with how delboy and big gareth and red /w/blue feel am no so sure mate
nogin Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 going with how delboy and big gareth and red /w/blue feel am no so sure mate CALM DOWN LAD PIECE OF CAKE 8)
Guest Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 i think it might get a bit heated if some of the top table refuse to go
Delboy Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 CALM DOWN LAD PIECE OF CAKE 8) :-/ :-/ 8)
nogin Posted January 16, 2009 Report Posted January 16, 2009 i think it might get a bit heated if some of the top table refuse to go DONT PANIC THE ARMY ARE ON STANDBY....OR SHOULD I SAY THE S.A.S. ;D
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now