Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 343
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Gareth Rankin
Posted

Wrong. I gave you a clue, that it was one of your peers, a well known and respected SNFC member. In the spirit of the person to whom this thread belongs, I won’t name names, but you’ll find him in Constitution & Rules, New Rules, 1, where 3 fanciers gave views on this. He is the second named person.

He might be one of your peers and if so best of luck, but one thing for sure he is not someone who i see as one of my peers. And is it not a coincidence that he just so happens to be a close friend of the man we are talking about on this thread.

 

 

 

Posted

He might be one of your peers and if so best of luck, but one thing for sure he is not someone who i see as one of my peers. And is it not a coincidence that he just so happens to be a close friend of the man we are talking about on this thread.

 

No offence, Gareth, but the main reason you are able to say what you have been saying about this man is that you are quote 'a well respected member of the SNFC' which you have used repeatedly to lend credibility to your posts. Ordinary people like me who post anything which calls these posts into question are immediately jumped upon by you and your friends as nobodies, bad for the sport, or friends of this man, in my case all three and more.

 

I posted that one of your peers, also a well respected member of the SNFC, who by your own standards must command equal credibility, was heard by me saying (and in summary it's recorded in that AGM's minutes), that what you wanted done (re-rubber one mans birds) was victimisation.

 

You have dismissed his opinion 'because he is a close friend of this man'. Another case of only what you and your friends say about this matter counts. Judge, Jury and Executioner rolled into one?

 

 

Guest redwhiteblue
Posted
its time for change out with old and in with new ,and lets put this behind us , and promote the snfc

 

hi mate are you referring this to everyone who's involved in the snfc from the president right down to the race control team and race conveyors including all the committee in my opinion the full lot should go

Guest Gareth Rankin
Posted

No offence, Gareth, but the main reason you are able to say what you have been saying about this man is that you are quote 'a well respected member of the SNFC' which you have used repeatedly to lend credibility to your posts.

 

Like you I am entitled to my opinion, the other members of the sport/forum will judge for themselves after everything is taken into consideration but even after they have posted on the thread you are still contrary even after everyone has voiced there opinion’s. Some are even the same fanciers that you have quoted as hounding the man out of the sport.

As for using my credibility, it is something I do not take likely and as such I would rather not post anything on this site but when it comes to conmen in the sport, I will not hide and will give my point of view especially if someone is promoting someone I feel is an evil in the sport.

 

Hopefully we can look forward to a new dawning of the SNFC tomorrow, it is the AGM and hopefully these posts that "I" "you" and "others" have contributed too will be a distant memory and then the members that have a love of the club will talk about the many positives within the club which at present is very hard to do.

Ordinary people like me who post anything which calls these posts into question are immediately jumped upon by you and your friends as nobodies, bad for the sport, or friends of this man, in my case all three and more.

Again your opinion

 

I posted that one of your peers, also a well respected member of the SNFC, who by your own standards must command equal credibility, was heard by me saying (and in summary it's recorded in that AGM's minutes), that what you wanted done (re-rubber one mans birds) was victimisation. You have dismissed his opinion 'because he is a close friend of this man'. Another case of only what you and your friends say about this matter counts. Judge, Jury and Executioner rolled into one?ne who i see as one of my peers. And is it not a coincidence that he just so happens to be a close friend of the man we are talking about on this thread.

 

He is entitled to his opinion as everyone is, but I dont have to agree with what I believe is a nonsense and a cop-out and one which the members could one day regret. And as a committee member at that time there was no victimisation, it was only a fancier/committee man concerned with the Heart of the SNFC, Past, Present and Future.

 

Posted

 

hi mate are you referring this to everyone who's involved in the snfc from the president right down to the race control team and race conveyors including all the committee in my opinion the full lot should go

 

The convoyer must be replaced, my opinion

Guest redwhiteblue
Posted

message for ib and his supporters the man was caught cheating with 3 fanciers from your area, a blind man can see that the sport is dying when guys like yourself and the cheat we can do without can't wait until tomorrow to see more of his supporters leaving

Posted

i think it might get a bit heated if some of the top table refuse to go

Posted
i think it might get a bit heated if some of the top table refuse to go

 

DONT PANIC THE ARMY ARE ON STANDBY....OR SHOULD I SAY THE S.A.S. ;D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Advert: Morray Firth One Loft Classic
  • Advert: M.A.C. Lofts Pigeon Products
  • Advert: RV Woodcraft
  • Advert: B.Leefe & Sons
  • Advert: Apex Garden Buildings
  • Advert: Racing Pigeon Supplies
  • Advert: Solway Feeders


×
×
  • Create New...