johno

well done you appear to be a true gentleman. i am sure very few appreciate the personal hardship you have undergone in your struggle for choice. not being able to participate in your averages just one of many i would imagine. this may be of assistance to you. most organisation compete for averages based on their race programme decided at the agm. this being th case the appleby race is the next race in your feds agm agrreed race programme. as you are the only one who has sent you should win the averages.

you will not qualify for the averages then?

did you set a clock for appleby?

70 birds big turnout for a fed. choice is what it is all about. easy to see decency and consideration for others is not on your agenda. if you are happy with the picture you are painting then i would not attempt to change that. these responses are completely different from "bullshite" and "wrong again" i hope your pigeons overcome and excel the test of appleby. how far is it to you?

would that be the meeting that never happened? would that be your appleby race today? would that be more than 60 birds at fed race? would that be the 22 members sending? would that be the midland federation let down? would this be a pattern?

now now bruno why are you so angry? i am only posting what disenchanted members are saying. anyway 60 birds was the federation total so no matter how angry you are facts is facts. your own habitual attempt to put me down will not work. i have too much presence of mind and self belief for anyone using your tacticts to have any effecton me. i also have the added bonus that i post the truth. it would now appear that you do not wish to allow this. as to offering solutions i fail to see where you are coming from. is there a problem? in response as to whose business anything on this board is i was under the impression that it is a public forum. this implies that the content is the business of any unsuspecting traveller on the net. the now regular aggressive postings using words like damned clearly indicate it is time for you to go. i suggest also that the usage of the word bullshite is a poor reflection on the poster. you appear to be quite happy with this kind of language. you appear also to have lost all self control. you also appear to now consider this forum as the bruno show. the truth is a faithful friend and a fearful enemy. it is time for you to face your demons.

disenchanted members of wos/dumbarton fed/club appeared at kilbarchin tonight with 60 pigeons for kelso. transported by renfrew. true or false doos. what about next week are you approaching eddie stobart?

disenchanted members of dumbarton / wos club / fed say going to the hole known as kelso with balochmyle and renfrew tomorrow. in what way are any of the postings bovine excrement and what is wrong again? like many of your postings doos r us nothing factual to respond with. solution is easy. are dumbarton wos / club fed going to kelso tomorrow 28th April with balochmyle / renfrew? yes or no.

the rpra stated that the europa classic had no rpra licence. they stated that they did not see that they had any control over the europa set up. europa are in control of their own situation they pointed out that in the event of any dispute the rpra would not be involved as the race with no licence had nothing to do with them ( the rpra). straight forward i think. race not taking place under rpra rules.

disenchanted members say no option. no one else to go with. meeting this week failed to identify any other option. renfrew having internal discussions on their own situation. no place for wos / dumbarton other than midland. disenchanted members think it will be a long season.

dumbarton club / wos fed looking for transport. saturday was a disaster with the midland according to some disenchanted members. had to hang around until 10.30 friday evening to get birds on transporter. good few doos missing on saturday. too late to look elsewhere as they walked out on renfrew to go with midland. is there a pattern here ? enjoy your racing all.

rpra atatement in this weeks bhw makes it clear.

bruno it is obvious that i have managed to annoy you. i fail to understand why some one like me so inferior to you and of inferior intellect can annoy you so much. your inbuilt self confidence and over estimation of your own capabilities seems to have been your down fall. if some one with your qualifications and self percieved leadership qualities has to operate on a forum like this in a vain attempt to feel a sense of power and self worth then i take it you must need the hit. this being the case i will attempt to limit my comments and let you sustain your needed adrenalin high provided by your feelings of being all powerful on this forum. good luck and welcome to the madhouse.

so the current thread concerning the europa situation is down to me. the letters indicating possible legal action in the bhw is down to me you suggest. i suppose you being a genius you would know what i am thinking better than i do. dream on. you are now getting to the stage where you are like a schoolyard buffoon with no credibility or support. not surprising how your clubmates react when you are mentioned. your actions and ravings on this forum have done you no favours. a dog with no teeth. no humility or principle. no sense of right nor wrong. no fairness. no dignity. no credibility. no good.

i do not know the name of the god who faced in all directions. i do know many people with many faces. your language and attempted ridiculing of individuals clearly highlights you are loosing the plot. as to ratifying constitutions i believe you are the only poster on this forum who has taken it upon themselves to have the bare faced affrontery to offer legal opinion. as for irrelevances i would suggest that your incessant and manic posting 2833 to date would indicate that you must have posted a fair amount of drivel yourself bruno. then again you have to appreciate i do not fully understand genius. i take it from your post you are not going to be decent enough to respond to mr shearer`s letter via the bhw. strange you feel the need to hide within this forum where mr shearer has no way of replying. it seems you have different rules for yourself than you apply to others. you are quite happy to attack mr shearer when he cannot respond. this does not surprise me and i think many other posters on the board will have similar feelings. could this be because you have no control over the delete button at the bhw. accepting the truth can be a diifcult and long process. indeed many never reach the point where they can fully cope with the implications of acceptance.

i take it in the interest of fairness and decency and to allow mr shearer the right to defend his position bruno you will have a letter in the bhw shortly responding to his trash. you appear to be quite willing to attack individuals and organisations who are clearly not involved in the forum and therefore cannot respond. at the same time yuou have used thissituation as an excuse to block and remove other peoples posts. is the fact that feds have been overepresented also trash. is the fact that the balochmyle fed had not had their agm and were therefore not entitled to send a delegate trash.

mr shearer is only posing questins. once again bruno it is ok for a genius like yourself to make scathing statements but you have no humility in blocking or deleting others in your warped attempt at giving your self a power trip of some kind. you have dfended the undefendable in the past by stating they were not on the forum to defend themselves. how is it when you are involved you appear to think you can post what you like. the implication of your post is that mr shearer is totally wrong. what about the number of delegates per fed issue? seems such a swathing statement. your actions over the last few weeks are frightening dogmatic and dictatorial. unfortunately this seems to be your perception of your own elevated position within the forum. be a man have a bit of humility and principle. resign as moderator before you lose everything.

what are your legal qualifications brune. this is a question not an opinion.

sorry to diappoint you roland even although you agree with me. i will be around as long as i can be.

given the response surely a court room may well be the next forum. i think we should close this thread and not put the site at risk.

doos r us you seem like a man after my own heart you stand up and take it and put your case forward. may i ask since you have felt the need to intervene about the price of a transporter that was aquired by dumbarton. i am lead to believe that the price almost doubled between official/s buying it form a third party and the price put to the agm.

tammy and gangster your comments are highly appreciated. i accept you may well be fed up of me and my making people aware of what the shu is up to in my opinion. i attempt to post facts and all my comments are based on facts. unfortunately there is no weay of separating the shu from the current leadership and the leadership of the last five or six years. in my opinion these people have caused or been party to some outrageous wrong doings. i am not willing to let this go. people soon forget or become complacent. unfortunately for some who have been previously referred to by me they do not have the option of trying to put things back as they were. many people post they are not aware of a lot of situations. by posting what has and continues to be happening no oner on here can say they did not know. i am aware of the repetition but some people in charge of the block or delete seem to think that the almighty organisation must be protected at any time. i must ask who needs protected from the truth. i do not accept that i should step back and let others rant and rave about how good a certain situation is. when one moderator openly admits he is having a dig at the rpra solely because people are asking questions of the shu and in his opinion ridiculing the shu it is time they handed in their badge. tammy i apologise to you if i have offended you in my last post. i see the other two jokers have never felt the need to respond.

when you take the time to look at the posts. then try to ridicule the posts based on facts. i think you will find that no one has managed to respond to the questions. i do not hate anything. i do think it is wrong to deny anyones right to ask question. you guys just highlight the situation. you have the gang mentality. as long as you have a huge numbers advantage you think think you are safe. when it comes down to a situation when you need to stand on your own against the odds a tinge of yellow appears. i will continue to think the way i think you can continue to act like puppets and sheep. i have complete faith in my own position. unlike some others on here i have no problem with anything you want to post about me. i am mature and confident enough in my own ability. if you want to get the hatchets out then so be it. i trust you will all stand up for my right to respond. or will the yellow tinge appear once i have highlighted your feeble attemp at removing me. i wonder who put you up to this. i realise that there are quite a few questions here so i will wait to see how you go.

well said boys. form a team and have a go.

anyone think my original was foresight or just a good guess?