I cannot raise any matters by virtue of a low score, so nothing will change. Any type of score requires to be accompanied by an opinion. Unless a decent amount of replies were received, these opinions would not form a consensus. People seem to complain that the SHU does nothing for them, but if they do not attend the AGM, if they do not inform delegates, if they sulk within their apathy, then nothing can ever change. Why should delegates alter what is working well? If it is not working well, why do members not attend their AGM and say it is not working well. I know most just want to race their pigeons, but the delegates want to do this also. They, however, give some of their time to try to keep the organisation going, but they need your support, even if that is a criticism of the current affairs.