Has always been the Tory's policy of High unemployment... However I am at pains how this works. The last two days have seen 1 million jobs losses, Armed services, and the Budget etc. etc. - Without other knock on effects of thousands more daily losing their jobs - plus the lost of 'Good Feel' factor. Of course this will resolve in more job losses and budget cutting. So A. How can there be more jobs available to force people back to work? Let alone those already unable to find a job. B. How does spending out £200 - £300 per week, on another million, two million more on top of those that have rapidly lost out since June... Nigh another Million! Yes how paying these persons each not working £200 - £200 a week help the economy? especially when they want to work and have been working. This alone will result in over £30 Billion extra taken out of our ecomony THIS year alone! Surely, like the 150,000 houses now being scrapped putting even more thousands on the dole, instead of them paying into the government coffers! Surely it is a better choice to have them working! Never mind forcing them to work.... can't work because the building etc. etc are grinding to a halt and NO NEW jobs are available. OK they will say there is, and the gullible will echo as such! But that is just to get support to fiddle the unemployed out of the dues that they have a right to and have earnt! How does the knock on effect of thousands soon to be losing their homes and being evicted help any party etc. the Tory mockers that are Housing associations - those that will once again like Thatcher intended gobble up these homes at a fraction of the their true worth of course will benefit! How does making another couple of million or so unemployed valuate that knocking back and causing hardship of those that want to work, but like the other few million soon to be, can't get a job, and of course the WAGES will be a pittance of what they were - So how does cutting back, and refusing if you have money saved, any benefit help those that can get jobs that aren't there Why is - like Thatcher who said 'Dentists' the poor don't need them didn’t have them in the 17th centaury!... go private, BUT couldn't because they were all full up, and people were travelling 100 miles and more to see a dentist help the good feel factor and your tooth ache! How will this soon to be £10 / £15 appointment fees help the working class working, let alone those that aren't and can't claim any benefit to help towards costs. How can 'We all be in it'? What a load of squabble squeak that SH&TE IS. Only the middle class and workers are in it! And soon up to the necks in it. How does the fact that the best results ever in bringing down crime - The Rich aren't effected YET! - and lower than 30 years ago, after bring in much needed new Bobbies means it is better to slash 40,000 police jobs to make it a better and safer place to live in. It so sad and pathetic to even is a joke. Typically Tory remedies 'Hammer those not able to fight back, Make the richer, and put more into their personal coffers. The cr$p about the Labour party getting us in to the quad mire eh! It was the rich greedy bankers, It was voted, which Chameleon and his party voted for and went along with, to BORROW money because businesses, and nigh every one relies on Banks! the realism that nigh ALL other countries followed suit of Gordon, and are now feeling the benefits of going along that road. Four years it is till w need to pay first instalment AND NO rising interest as it is a set rate.... So why not get the economy going and then as Gordon said when on a sound footing again start reducing our Bill. Like Gordon did when he finally repaid ALL our doubts of.... which the Tories couldn't and refused to do. Baffled I'd love for those Tory voters, especially those soon to lose their' jobs, to answer that. This was sent to a Tory etc. etc. who invited questions and concerns VIA me! He came back, which I could post to prove, but that won't happen - 'Neither do we know....'
