Jump to content

Blue Chequer Pied

Members
  • Posts

    4,000
  • Joined

Everything posted by Blue Chequer Pied

  1. Thanks Jim. I will get it fed up a bit and get it on the lorry.
  2. I have just picked up this bird SU 14 ML 4000 from a non fancier. Can anybody help with club/owner please. Thanks, Paul.
  3. Great team performance
  4. North of Scotland Federation 62 Members Liberated 1278 birds in a Moderate WSW Wind with Broken Cloud 2 E2 MASKAME & MACKIE Phd. & District SU14NE5398 H 113 976 1 52 25.0 1777.815 1 E1 MASKAME & MACKIE Phd. & District SU14NE5320 H 113 976 1 52 25.0 1777.815 3 E3 MASKAME & MACKIE Phd. & District SU14NE5372 C 113 976 1 52 26.0 1777.551 4 E4 J & A DONALDSON Phd. & District IHU14S124962 H 113 1016 1 53 12.0 1765.866 5 E5 J & A DONALDSON Phd. & District IHU14S124905 C 113 1016 1 53 13.0 1765.606 6 E6 J & A DONALDSON Phd. & District SU14NE5919 H 113 1016 1 53 15.0 1765.086 7 E7 J S ROBERTSON Inverurie SU14NE1642 C 89 86 1 31 1.0 1721.948 8 E8 J ( Ian ) GIBB Fr. & District SU14NE7555 C 121 1037 2 6 44.0 1688.561 9 E9 J ( Ian ) GIBB Fr. & District SU14NE7554 H 121 1037 2 6 47.0 1687.895 10 E10 W HENDERSON Fr. West End SU14NE4342 C 121 358 2 7 19.0 1675.492 11 E11 G WILLOX Phd. & District SU14NE6632 H 113 865 1 59 36.0 1670.109 12 E12 C DONALDSON Phd. & District SU14NE5512 H 113 1331 1 59 56.0 1669.352 13 E13 C DONALDSON Phd. & District SU14NE6663 C 113 1331 1 59 57.0 1669.120 14 E14 W MASSON Fr. & District SU14NE7442 C 121 1304 2 8 59.0 1661.176 15 E15 J ( Ian ) GIBB Fr. & District SU14NE7594 H 121 1037 2 9 11.0 1656.537 16 E16 W MASSON Fr. & District SU14NE7445 H 121 1304 2 9 27.0 1655.187 17 E17 W MASSON Fr. & District SU14NE7403 C 121 1304 2 9 28.0 1654.974 18 E18 C MCRAE Fr. & District SU14NE7303 C 121 658 2 9 5.0 1654.884 19 E19 G TAYLOR Phd. & District SU14NE6801 H 114 168 2 1 23.0 1654.329 20 E20 G WILLOX Phd. & District SU14NE6685 H 113 865 2 0 50.0 1653.062 21 E21 D HAY Phd. & District SU14NE5241 H 113 426 2 0 37.0 1652.392 22 E22 G WILLOX Phd. & District SU14NE6677 H 113 865 2 1 6.0 1649.422 23 E23 R BARCLAY Fr. West End SU14NE4114 H 121 119 2 10 9.0 1637.180 24 E24 D HAY Phd. & District SU14NE5248 H 113 426 2 1 58.0 1634.102 25 E25 G TAYLOR Phd. & District SU14NE6866 C 114 168 2 3 39.0 1624.003 26 E26 G TAYLOR Phd. & District SU14NE6857 H 114 168 2 4 24.0 1614.212 27 E27 W HENDERSON Fr. West End SU14NE4363 H 121 358 2 13 0.0 1603.895 28 E28 W HENDERSON Fr. West End SU14NE4341 C 121 358 2 13 6.0 1602.690 29 E29 C DONALDSON Phd. & District SU14NE5508 H 113 1331 2 6 0.0 1588.976 30 W1 A WILSON Devern Valley GB14P35619 C 113 1457 2 6 33.0 1583.066 East Section 29 members sent 794 birds 2 1 MASKAME & MACKIE Phd. & District SU14NE5398 H 113 976 1 52 25.0 1777.815 1 2 MASKAME & MACKIE Phd. & District SU14NE5320 H 113 976 1 52 25.0 1777.815 3 3 MASKAME & MACKIE Phd. & District SU14NE5372 C 113 976 1 52 26.0 1777.551 4 4 J & A DONALDSON Phd. & District IHU14S124962 H 113 1016 1 53 12.0 1765.866 5 5 J & A DONALDSON Phd. & District IHU14S124905 C 113 1016 1 53 13.0 1765.606 6 6 J & A DONALDSON Phd. & District SU14NE5919 H 113 1016 1 53 15.0 1765.086 7 7 J S ROBERTSON Inverurie SU14NE1642 C 89 86 1 31 1.0 1721.948 8 8 J ( Ian ) GIBB Fr. & District SU14NE7555 C 121 1037 2 6 44.0 1688.561 9 9 J ( Ian ) GIBB Fr. & District SU14NE7554 H 121 1037 2 6 47.0 1687.895 10 10 W HENDERSON Fr. West End SU14NE4342 C 121 358 2 7 19.0 1675.492 West Section 33 members sent 484 birds 30 1 A WILSON Devern Valley GB14P35619 C 113 1457 2 6 33.0 1583.066 34 2 A MILNE Devern Valley SU14NE3001 H 112 1310 2 7 1.0 1562.236 35 3 A WILSON Devern Valley SU14NE2872 C 113 1457 2 8 38.0 1557.427 36 4 A MILNE Devern Valley SU14NE3006 C 112 1310 2 7 49.0 1552.458 37 5 A RITCHIE Devern Valley SU14NE3191 C 113 600 2 8 33.0 1551.770 38 6 A WILSON Devern Valley SU14NE2869 H 113 1457 2 9 29.0 1547.203 39 7 G WILSON Devern Valley NL146275130 H 104 1658 2 1 17.0 1522.864 40 8 G WILSON Devern Valley SU14NE2759 C 104 1658 2 1 23.0 1521.609 41 9 A RITCHIE Devern Valley SU14NE3177 C 113 600 2 14 0.0 1488.657 42 10 D SMITH Devern Valley SU14NE3083 H 112 1318 2 14 23.0 1476.656 Clubs First Bird MASKAME & MACKIE Phd. & District SU14NE5320 1777.815 J S ROBERTSON Inverurie SU14NE1642 1721.948 J ( Ian ) GIBB Fr. & District SU14NE7555 1688.561 W HENDERSON Fr. West End SU14NE4342 1675.492 A WILSON Devern Valley GB14P35619 1583.066 A J REID Keith SU14NE4723 1346.810 R BAIN Buckie & District SU14NE2155 1197.614 A MORTIMER Elgin & District SU14NE288 1178.317 P THOMSON Forres SU14NE3509 1067.390 WELL DONE TO MASKAME & MACKIE ON TOPPING THE FED.
  5. Well done auld yin. Georgie told me you were 50 about 5 years ago !!!
  6. Off topic Danny. Get back to the point and admit you were WRONG regarding the Rangers - Sporting result
  7. Maybe they can't count either lol
  8. I have always enjoyed your input Frank and my thoughts are with you. Paul.
  9. How do you manage to find your way home every day
  10. The big problem is he seems to be unable to count to 6!
  11. Danny read this.... but it could be a big conspiracy right enough! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_European_Cup_Winners'_Cup_Final
  12. Danny you are wrong again. This might make it easier for you to understand Rangers goals on the left ..... Round Opponents First leg Second leg Aggregate score First round Stade Rennes 1–1 (a) 1–0 (h) 2–1 Second round Sporting Lisbon 3–2 (h) 3–4 (a) AET 6–6 Quarter-finals Torino 1–1 (a) 1–0 (h) 2–1 Semi-finals Bayern Munich 1–1 (a) 2–0 (h) 3–1
  13. You need help man. It was 5-5 on aggregate after 180 mins with both teams recording a 3-2 home win. As a result at this stage away goals did not come into effect as both teams had scored 2 away goals at this point. Hence the reason for extra time. The fact that Rangers scored another AWAY goal in extra time meant that they went through on away goals (3 for the gets and 2 for sporting) and the penalties should never have happened. As it is
  14. Yes but they were at home expletive remove and lost the first game at Ibrox 3-2. Therefor they scored 2 away goals and Rangers scored 3 away goals...... Now can you do the sums? As it is, here for the Bears
  15. expletive remove Danny where have you ever had to win a footie game by 2 goals. The away goal only comes into effect in the event of a draw. A team could score 9 away goals but its counts for naff all if they get beat 10-9..... or would the team that scored 10 lose as they didn't get 11 Are you not getting confused with Tennis wherby you have to win a deciding set by 2 clear games As it is.... you know the rest
  16. Rangers began their route to the final by beating Stade Rennes 2–1 on aggregate. The first leg was drawn 1–1 with Willie Johnston scoring for Rangers. Rangers won the return leg 1–0 through Alex MacDonald. The second round saw Rangers play Sporting Lisbon from Portugal. Rangers led the first half of the first leg 3–0, but lost two goals in the second half to lead 3–2 going into the second leg. The second leg finished 3–2 to Sporting, 5–5 on aggregate. Willie Henderson scored for Rangers in extra time but Rangers then lost a goal with six minutes left to make it 6–6 on aggregate. What followed has been described as being one of the most bizarre incidents in the history of any European tournament.[1] The Dutch referee Laurens van Raavens failed to recognise that Rangers, having scored three away goals to Sporting's two, had won the tie. But the referee made both teams take five penalties each, with Rangers losing the shootout. After Rangers manager Willie Waddell pointed out the away goals rule to UEFA, the referee was overruled, the result overturned and Rangers were heading into the next round.[1] Rangers then played Torino, Italian league leaders at the time, and won 2–1 on aggregate. In the semi final Rangers played Bayern Munich, who had beaten Rangers in the final five years previously in Nuremberg. Rangers progressed 3–1 on aggregate to reach their third European final. As it is, here for the Bears
  17. Well done to George Duthie and all the club secretaries for getting the result out so quickly
×
×
  • Create New...