ALF Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 it is not my intention to mislead anyone on this forum you will note that I am not the one making up all the lies I am only looking to correct some of your totally inaccurate postings as some people might actually beleive you, why dont you ask ian henderson if john barlow is a member of the fed maybe that will end the crap you are posting. WHY DONT YOU ASK IAN YOURSELF AND AT THE SAME TIME FIND OUT IF THERE ARE ENOUGH PEOPLE IN THE WEST OF SCOTLAND FED TO ACTUALLY HAVE A FED AS PER THE SHU RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ALF Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 T3DOO ALMOST EVERYBODY FROM LANARKSHIRE ON THIS FORUM KNOWS WHO I AM BUT I NOTICE THAT YOU DO ALL YOUR TALKING WHILE HIDING BEHIND YOUR USERNAME SO COME ON TELL US ALL WHO YOU ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-/ :-/ :-/ :-/
ALF Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 T3DOO THERE APPEARS TO BE QUITE A LONG TIME BETWEEN YOUR POSTS : ARE YOU WAITING TO SEE WHAT YOUR PUPPET MASTER WANTS YOU TO WRITE?????????????????? OR IS HIS PHONE ENGAGED IS THAT WHY IT'S TAKING YOU SO LONG TO ANSWER??????
t3doo Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 WHY DONT YOU ASK IAN YOURSELF AND AT THE SAME TIME FIND OUT IF THERE ARE ENOUGH PEOPLE IN THE WEST OF SCOTLAND FED TO ACTUALLY HAVE A FED AS PER THE SHU RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the answer to your question with regard to west of scotland federation is YES but perhaps you could please quote the rule to us all and tell us where the rules are being broken. and by the way dont ask me to do it as i`m fed up trying to keep you right.
ALF Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 the answer to your question with regard to west of scotland federation is YES but perhaps you could please quote the rule to us all and tell us where the rules are being broken. and by the way dont ask me to do it as i`m fed up trying to keep you right. YOU DONT HAVE TO KEEP ANYONE RIGHT AS WE HAVE ALL BEEN LAUGHING AT YOU FOR THE LAST FEW DAYS ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D JUST YOU BRING US BACK FACTS AS I THINK WE ALL KNOW MORE THAN YOU DO ABOUT THE SITUATION THAT YOU SEEM TO BE SHOUTING YOUR MOUTH OFF ABOUT ;) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
ALF Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 GO ON PHONE HIM AGAIN AND SEE WHAT HE WANTS YOU TO WRITE ABOUT IT NOW :P ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D IT CANNAE TAKE YOU THAT LONG TO MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND SURELY??? DOES IT???? :-/ :-/ :-/ ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
ALF Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 MAYBE IT DOES TAKE YOU THAT LONG ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
t3doo Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 T3DOO ALMOST EVERYBODY FROM LANARKSHIRE ON THIS FORUM KNOWS WHO I AM BUT I NOTICE THAT YOU DO ALL YOUR TALKING WHILE HIDING BEHIND YOUR USERNAME SO COME ON TELL US ALL WHO YOU ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-/ :-/ :-/ :-/ nae chance I am not fond of knifes in the back, lets just say I dont know you and thats fine with me ,I am really sorry if you are offended with my posts as that is not my intention so lets not get personal. after all it is quite obvious from your postings and my own that we have different opinions so we would hardly make good buddys if that was your intention!!!!!!!!
ALF Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 nae chance I am not fond of knifes in the back, lets just say I dont know you and thats fine with me ,I am really sorry if you are offended with my posts as that is not my intention so lets not get personal. after all it is quite obvious from your postings and my own that we have different opinions so we would hardly make good buddys if that was your intention!!!!!!!! I WAS'NT GETTING PERSONAL T3DOO IT'S JUST THAT I HAVE THE BALLS TO SAY WHO I AM OBVIOUSLY YOU DONT SO THAT SHOULD BE THE END OF THE MATTER OR DO YOU WANT TO HIDE FOREVER??????? :-/ :-/ :-/ :-/
t3doo Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 T3DOO THERE APPEARS TO BE QUITE A LONG TIME BETWEEN YOUR POSTS : ARE YOU WAITING TO SEE WHAT YOUR PUPPET MASTER WANTS YOU TO WRITE?????????????????? OR IS HIS PHONE ENGAGED IS THAT WHY IT'S TAKING YOU SO LONG TO ANSWER?????? DINNAE KEN HIS NUMBER PERHAPS YOU CAN POST IT ON THE FORUM CHEERS.
ALF Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 ONE WORD "CHICKEN" NO ONE KNOWS WHO YOU ARE AND YOU KEEP POSTING BEHIND THAT AS IF YOU KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON AND YOU DONT SO GIE US ALL A BREAK AND BRING US THE FACTS!!!!! BUT NO YOU CANT BECAUSE NOT ONCE HAVE YOU POSTED THEM IN THESE FORUMS ALTHOUGH YOU WOULD LIKE EVERYBODY TO THINK YOU HAVE : : : : :
t3doo Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 YOU DONT HAVE TO KEEP ANYONE RIGHT AS WE HAVE ALL BEEN LAUGHING AT YOU FOR THE LAST FEW DAYS ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D JUST YOU BRING US BACK FACTS AS I THINK WE ALL KNOW MORE THAN YOU DO ABOUT THE SITUATION THAT YOU SEEM TO BE SHOUTING YOUR MOUTH OFF ABOUT ;) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D your the one shouting your mouth off so lets hear it,I dont mind you all laughing at me but lets share the joke and we`ll all have a laugh!!!!!!!!! (no relevent rules to back you up then.)
ALF Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 your the one shouting your mouth off so lets hear it,I dont mind you all laughing at me but lets share the joke and we`ll all have a laugh!!!!!!!!! (no relevent rules to back you up then.) THERE HAS BEEN NO RULES TO BACK UP WHAT YOUR PAL HAS DONE IN JOINING THE WEST OF SCOTLAND FED BUT I DID NOTICE THAT NOBODY HAS POSTED HOW MANY MEMBERS ARE IN THAT FED SO IS HE TRYING TO GET IN THE BACK DOOR TO THE SHU BECAUSE THE LANARKSHIRE FED VOTED HIM OUT??????
GREENGRASS Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 t3 doo.... 24 hours and you can only come up with some smoke and daggers. you obviously do not have a clue about what you are posting and are being used a pawn to peddle a bunch of lies. but try and redeem yourself here and tell us at which meeting did mr barlow resign. it would also appear your maths is your weakest link for 11+1 does not equal 20 or even close. from my own experience signed and dated letters do not have any place in the shu office nor do registered ones either.............. ;D ;D
t3doo Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 ONE WORD "CHICKEN" NO ONE KNOWS WHO YOU ARE AND YOU KEEP POSTING BEHIND THAT AS IF YOU KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON AND YOU DONT SO GIE US ALL A BREAK AND BRING US THE FACTS!!!!! BUT NO YOU CANT BECAUSE NOT ONCE HAVE YOU POSTED THEM IN THESE FORUMS ALTHOUGH YOU WOULD LIKE EVERYBODY TO THINK YOU HAVE : : : : : I am not the one making any claims and I do not appreciate the childish name calling it is my privilage to post as I do, are you telling me you know every one who posts on this forum, I hardly think so!!!!!!!!! P.S. you probably know all your anti SHU buddys who post on the forum by their proper names thats your business, mines my own.
ALF Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 t3doo I CANNAE BELIEVE THAT YOU TAKE THIS LONG TO THINK OF AN ANSWER ON YOUR OWN??? DO YOU???? ANYWAY YOU NEED TO GET THE FACTS ON YOUR SHU PRESIDENT THEN POST THEM FOR ALL TO SEE BECAUSE YOU ARE STILL NOT POSTING THE FACTS!!!!! OR IS THAT COZ YOU DONT KNOW THEM???????????????? : : ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
ALF Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 ANYWAY GOODNIGHT AND GOD BLESS BECAUSE I HAVE NOT SEEN ANYTHING TO BACK UP YOUR STATEMENT THAT MR BARLOW HAS DONE NOTHING WRONG!!!! (WHERE IS THE NUMBERS WHO ARE IN THE FED HE HAS JOINED?????????) I SEE NOBODY HAS POSTED THE NUMBERS IS THAT BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE????????? PS..... THIS COULD BE YOUR GOOD FRIENDS DOWNFALL NOW THAT EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT THERE IS'NT ENOUGH MEMBERS IN THE FED HE HAS JOINED!!!!! OR DO YOU HAVE FACTS TO SAY THERE IS?????????
t3doo Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 t3 doo.... 24 hours and you can only come up with some smoke and daggers. you obviously do not have a clue about what you are posting and are being used a pawn to peddle a bunch of lies. but try and redeem yourself here and tell us at which meeting did mr barlow resign. it would also appear your maths is your weakest link for 11+1 does not equal 20 or even close. from my own experience signed and dated letters do not have any place in the shu office nor do registered ones either.............. ;D ;D unlike some on this board I am nobodys puppet and I write what I like to write, it would appear you and your pals dont like it so I must be doing something right, my maths is fine your right 11+1 does not equal 20 it would appear you can count after all congratulations, are you trying to make point if so lets hear it !!!!!!!!!!
t3doo Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 ANYWAY GOODNIGHT AND GOD BLESS BECAUSE I HAVE NOT SEEN ANYTHING TO BACK UP YOUR STATEMENT THAT MR BARLOW HAS DONE NOTHING WRONG!!!! (WHERE IS THE NUMBERS WHO ARE IN THE FED HE HAS JOINED?????????) I SEE NOBODY HAS POSTED THE NUMBERS IS THAT BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE????????? PS..... THIS COULD BE YOUR GOOD FRIENDS DOWNFALL NOW THAT EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT THERE IS'NT ENOUGH MEMBERS IN THE FED HE HAS JOINED!!!!! OR DO YOU HAVE FACTS TO SAY THERE IS????????? I do not see what you and your pals are so concerned about the numbers in west of scotland i`ll bet you cant tell me how many are in your own federations, I would suggest that you leave the west of scotland federation to take care of their own business, still cant see any relevent ruling in the SHU rule book boys perhaps you all know better, if so quote it or forget it, could we be clutching at straws perhaps. I am getting tired of this now so heres a fact WEST OF SCOTLAND ARE ACCEPTED AS A FEDERATION WITH THEIR OWN RULES AND CONSTITUTION BY THE SCOTTISH HOMING UNION AND I DONT THINK THAT WILL CHANGE TO SUIT YOU OR YOUR PALS OR THE PUPPET MASTER SO YOU CAN ALL LIVE IN HOPE IF YOU WANT, LANARSHIRE MAY HAVE A RULING OF ONE CLUB OR ONE FED OR EVERYBODY HAS TO COME TO BASKETING WEARING A TAMMY OR WHATEVER, THAT HOWEVER HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OTHER FEDERATION, MOST FEDERATIONS IN SCOTLAND ALLOW DUPLICATION INTO ANY OTHER CLUBS, FEDERATIONS,SPECIALIST CLUBS AND EVEN OTHER UNIONS SO I DONT SEE A PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!!
johno Posted January 7, 2007 Author Report Posted January 7, 2007 at last a reply to the one fed situation. lanarkshire have enforced this rule in the past. it wouild be good to know when the resignation of the shu president from his lanarkshire club took place. it never happened at any of our meetings. this indicates your statement that the shu president is not a member of the club or lanarkshire highly questionable.
Guest WINGS 04 Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 why did we have a vote in lanarkshire fed to see who was going to be president if mr barlow had put in his resignation as you and i no t3doo if you do not do this befor the agm you are still a member for one more year
johno Posted January 7, 2007 Author Report Posted January 7, 2007 thats clarified the situation wings. clear case opf rule breaking by the shu president. once again extremely poor show extremely poor example.
frank-123 Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 great point there wings we have a man standing to represent lanarkshire federation as there federation president but loses a very tight vote so he opts to join a new federation must have cared a lot for lanarkshire just makes me glad he was voted out stand and take a defeat like a man and come back stronger or jump ship what would you do?
GREENGRASS Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 correct bart ........... your club dont want you to represent them, your fed dont want you to represent them, so what do you you do. you join a non entity of a fed with a non entity patrner who is himself embroiled in controversy after timing another fanciers bird in to claim 2nd section young bird national and overnight you move to become their fed delegate, says a lot for the members of the alleged fed does it not. the worrying concern for me is why are they so desperate to keep this person in control, are his strings so easily controlled that he must be kept in place. one fact i do know is that the rest of the uk unions and organisations must be looking at this shambles and laughing up their sleeves.....again.
t3doo Posted January 7, 2007 Report Posted January 7, 2007 why did we have a vote in lanarkshire fed to see who was going to be president if mr barlow had put in his resignation as you and i no t3doo if you do not do this befor the agm you are still a member for one more year not the case in lanarkshire federation as they have a one federation rule. without making it too complicated there are no individual members in any federations in membership of the SHU, the CLUBS form the federations therefore john barlow is not required to resign from the federation!!!!!!!!! where lanarkshire have a one federation rule if any member joins any other federation then they automatically forfeit membership of lanarkshire federation, so it would appear john barlow is not even required to resign from his club!!!!!!!!!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now