Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
you cant argue rules whu  or with its pres

 

Would be interested on reading the actual rule as it is written in the rule book any chance of copying it on here.

Posted

Surely that only applies to cover any expences the finder incurs in repatriating the bird, not if you collect it. If not, a rule like that positively encourages stray catching and makes it a lucrative business.

Posted
try telling the pres that  his word is final  in meet i pointed out this and was told to be quiet

 

Rules are passed by the clubs and it,s members so its up to them to change it,the president is only carrying out is job correctly.

Posted
i recently reported 1 the guy was moaning about amtrak costs so i went 40 miles to meet him ...took nothing from the man either........

 

fair play gangster but if the birds not worh the price of amtrak u have to wonder why pll keep these birds

Posted

 

Rules are passed by the clubs and it,s members so its up to them to change it,the president is only carrying out is job correctly.

 

only  whu com agree  rules as per the  pres  final word all comunication is put to him  or you are refered to him by sec clubs in whu have no say or its senable members

Guest strapper
Posted
and yes it is agood way to make money  as   the  whu are  about to  recaive  invioce for twelve

 

if this is the case that the owners of the pigeon, has to pay the finder £30,and then urself collects this money when the owner turns up for that bird, surely then ur doing the same thing ur complaining about?

and i dont think the fancier will be too happy with urself as u wasnt with the guy who reported ur bird?

there will be no winner in urself charging for finding birds and reporting them, as u urself dissagrees with this ruling.

i always thought it was that any costs the finder has getting the bird back to the owner, then the owner should compensate the finder upto the price of sending for the bird?  

 

 

 

Posted

I went just this morning 15 miles to meet a guy to return his stray pigeon it will have cost him about 10 pounds to come and collect the bird by road, so hopefully i have saved him 20 pounds from the price of Amtrak i would not have dreamed of asking him for money for looking after it for the week. whu rule  62 page25  must reward to equivalent of currant Amtrak charges also covers rule 39 page14 I think that this rule needs to questioned at WHU next AGM.

Posted

 

only  whu com agree  rules as per the  pres  final word all comunication is put to him  or you are refered to him by sec clubs in whu have no say or its senable members

 

Surely clubs have a say in any rule changes as we do in the RPRA,it is the commitee that agrees to any propositions for changes in the rules but normally clubs would vote on them beforehand.

Posted

I disagree with any member being told to "Be Quiet" what an advert for the sport.I know rules are rules but there are better ways of carrying them out without being "Dicatorial" Maybe someone has shares in Amtrak,is it not true there are others in opposition at a cheaper rate. All you Welsh should move up North of the Border only costs you a tenner.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted

 

if this is the case that the owners of the pigeon, has to pay the finder £30,and then urself collects this money when the owner turns up for that bird, surely then ur doing the same thing ur complaining about?

and i dont think the fancier will be too happy with urself as u wasnt with the guy who reported ur bird?

there will be no winner in urself charging for finding birds and reporting them, as u urself dissagrees with this ruling.

i always thought it was that any costs the finder has getting the bird back to the owner, then the owner should compensate the finder upto the price of sending for the bird?  

my problem is with whu rule and if fanciers bury there heads thats up to them  iwant the rule removed  and my costs reimbursed  so whu will pay or do this  the fancier could not provide proof of cost to whu or myself  but i still had  to pay

 

 

 

Guest Gareth Rankin
Posted
Surely that only applies to cover any expences the finder incurs in repatriating the bird, not if you collect it. If not, a rule like that positively encourages stray catching and makes it a lucrative business.

 

Seems like the rule is getting took out of context by the President, my reading of it is for transportation costs.

 

Chriss any chance of shares in your new pest control company.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Advert: Morray Firth One Loft Classic
  • Advert: M.A.C. Lofts Pigeon Products
  • Advert: RV Woodcraft
  • Advert: B.Leefe & Sons
  • Advert: Apex Garden Buildings
  • Advert: Racing Pigeon Supplies
  • Advert: Solway Feeders


×
×
  • Create New...