me Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 what would you get out of trying to get someone in trouble The SHU has for years and years been full of people who have enjoyed "lording" it over ordinary doomen who have dared say "boo" to them and they get their "thrills" by banning people for extraordinary long lengths of time that bear no relation to the supposed "crime" they decide has been committed.
I Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 I said this earlier and some boffin locked the post must be scared of the truth.
me Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 Hi Me I didn't invite Mr Scott Gibson to our Annual Presentation Mr Hendry did food for thought Cheers Homer 49 The only food for thought the members of this forum need is the fact that you regularly "debate" on this forum with a fellow member and then "stab them in the back". No doubt you are "still laughing". Pathetic!
ALF Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 The only food for thought the members of this forum need is the fact that you regularly "debate" on this forum with a fellow member and then "stab them in the back". No doubt you are "still laughing". Pathetic! Now we know what we are dealing with "me" maybe watch what we are saying in future eh!! Aye that'll be right!!
I Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 "alf" be careful as today it is vince hendry but who knows who is next, as i asked earlier who runs your fed..?
ALF Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 "alf" be careful as today it is vince hendry but who knows who is next, as i asked earlier who runs your fed..? Could well be myself next "i" especially when the SHU has someone on this site willing to do their bidding for them But will it stop me writng stuff on here if i dont agree with some of their decisions? NO CHANCE!
rednyellow Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 The SHU has for years and years been full of people who have enjoyed "lording" it over ordinary doomen who have dared say "boo" to them and they get their "thrills" by banning people for extraordinary long lengths of time that bear no relation to the supposed "crime" they decide has been committed. got too disagree with your point, officialdom comes with a price an awful lot of people give up time at weekends to attend council meetings trying to find solutions to problems mostly created by clubs and feds not using proper procedures,myself i am married with a family and can think of a lot better things too do on a sunday, governing bodies in our sport could do with more support from "ordinary doomen"as stated, these guys are mostly doomen also.
ALF Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 got too disagree with your point, officialdom comes with a price an awful lot of people give up time at weekends to attend council meetings trying to find solutions to problems mostly created by clubs and feds not using proper procedures,myself i am married with a family and can think of a lot better things too do on a sunday, governing bodies in our sport could do with more support from "ordinary doomen"as stated, these guys are mostly doomen also. just to pick up a wee point in your post not getting at you or anything just wanting to find out something here Are you saying that some of the council are'nt pigeon men/women?
Whats it called Cumbernauld Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 In many ways Red you are right, they are only as good as the support,and the power we give then,and that is sadly not enough You are right they give there time for our sport and we should be thankfull for that
me Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 got too disagree with your point, officialdom comes with a price an awful lot of people give up time at weekends to attend council meetings trying to find solutions to problems mostly created by clubs and feds not using proper procedures,myself i am married with a family and can think of a lot better things too do on a sunday, governing bodies in our sport could do with more support from "ordinary doomen"as stated, these guys are mostly doomen also. Well if you think banning someone from taking part in the sport they love for a longer period than many people convicted of murder serve, then maybe you should think again. We are members of a sport Rednyellow that is fast heading for the buffers banning people should be the last resort not the first.
rednyellow Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 just to pick up a wee point in your post not getting at you or anything just wanting to find out something here Are you saying that some of the council are'nt pigeon men/women? the point i made is not political,too the best of my knowledge all members of shu council are fanciers, if you check 100 years shu centenary book all council members are listed, no secrets! :)
HOMER49 Posted July 8, 2008 Author Report Posted July 8, 2008 homer what would you get out of trying to get someone in trouble with the shu Hi Rab Ever been in a no win situation a) a person and friend who you hold in the highest regard (not in Lanarkshire fed) Alf on this site who I enjoy his banter Asked if I had seen the post (yes) Asked if I would send a copy to SHU (yes) be it reluctantly Cheers Homer 49
gangster Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 SORRY HOMER I THINK YOU ARE BANG OUT OF ORDER HERE!!! IF YOUR BUDDY WANTS ANYTHING OFF THIS SITE HE SHOULD HAVE GOT IT HIMSELF ...
Whats it called Cumbernauld Posted July 8, 2008 Report Posted July 8, 2008 Homer, A man,s got to do what a man,s got to do. Most on this site have very good views and arguements and ALF is no exception. There can be little doubt Lanarkshire has its problems,and i am not sure that the written wordon this fourm,is the best way to solve them. To many say that the welfare of the birds should come first ,only to get carried away with what they want. The East and West Issue is easy resolved, go down which ever presents the best weather that week, and be prepared to move once down there to east or west. I know it sounds simple but just sometimes the simple things are best. Happy days
ALF Posted July 9, 2008 Report Posted July 9, 2008 Hi Rab Ever been in a no win situation a) a person and friend who you hold in the highest regard (not in Lanarkshire fed) Alf on this site who I enjoy his banter Asked if I had seen the post (yes) Asked if I would send a copy to SHU (yes) be it reluctantly Cheers Homer 49 Looks like you are in breach of site rules by copying something i put on and sending it to the SHU Homer http://forum.pigeonbasics.com/m-1215559444/
DOVEScot Posted July 9, 2008 Report Posted July 9, 2008 Looks like you are in breach of site rules by copying something i put on and sending it to the SHU Homer http://forum.pigeonbasics.com/m-1215559444/ Crap, we break the rules every day on the site, do you have copyright on your avatar Alf :-/ Very grey are is copyright, very easy to get past it and very hard to prove it is yours, Even big companies like NIKE have huge problems You are posting on an open forum and unless you state material posted is copyrighted then you will have a problem seeking kegal action, I know this from having worked on designs in the past Do you have copyright on your avatar Gangster :-/ :-/ :-/ if we start being picky then there could be huge problems for us or the site :-/
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now