Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I also notice he is selling under another name. What happened to 'klakpigeons' and the other names he sold under.  :-/

 

My favourite is  ' WINNER FOR SALE   ........ 15th club from 58 birds'  add a couple of photo's and some poor novice conned again.

These people need to be exposed for what they are. This kind of fraud/ deception whatever you want to call it is damaging the sport.

 

Paul.

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Chriss, I think from a legal standpoint, you are breaking the law having any such list.  You may recall that recently, a private company listed persons within the construction industry who were considered by them to be "Bad risk" employees.  The list was based on unsubstantiated reports of the individuals, regularly going sick, turning up late etc.  It was deemed unlawful.  It is a difficult one.  Everyone should be aware that you cannot be prosecuted for telling the truth.  Any claims made about someone, should be able to be corroborated.  I do feel sorry for some people who take on trust sellers claims, either because they are economical with the truth, or tell blatant lies.  For me, I don't believe in flying saucers, until I see a flying saucer. If someone tells me his birds are top performers, show me (in person) the cards, when they were won (not 10 yeras ago), against how many birds, at what distance etc.  For example, I certainly ain't going to accept some vague photo of rows of prize cards that I can't read.  Some people are too trusting, and some people are too plausible.   There are some hard lessons to learn in life, and the sooner one becomes aware of the pitfalls, the better.

Posted

Just a small add on, to my previous post.  There are some on here, who feel a genuine obligation to highlight some of their reservations concerning the authenticity of some people's claims.  Not for personal gain or reasons, but because they see injustices being done.  I agree that these comments also should not be taken at face value.  Nor should that person be victimised for expressing a view, that may weel save someone from wasting hard earned cash.

Posted
ahh i was right look what i stated earlier... ;D ;D look below.

 

anyone watch the programme escape to the country...they bought a lovely little house/bungalow what ever you call that type of building. .

  :-/ would that be a COTTAGE :).

 

 

Guest youngzimmy
Posted

I WAS AND STILL AM LOOKING TO GET HOLD OF INGRAM & LANGTONS PHONE NUMBER TO CLEAR UP WITH THEM IF THE PEDIGREES ARE OK AS I HAD  BID FOR TWO OF  THERE SUPPOSED BIRDS AND LIKE EVERYONE ELSE I DO NOT WANT TO GET RIPPED OFF THAT IS THE BASIS OF ALL THIS CONFUSSION

Posted
  :-/ would that be a COTTAGE :).

 

 

:) would that be a  DOUBLE COTTAGE, :) ;D.

Posted

I do not post very often on this site, the good lord gave you two eyes, two ears and one mouth, ergo, you do twice as much listening and looking as you do talking...on the original post which was removed by whoever saw fit, a member asked for a partnerships phone number, i answered the post, stating i knew the number but would NOT release it without said owners permission, since then i have received several messages on here and other sites im a member of asking for this number, i say again (before this post gets removed )   DO NOT ASK ME FOR IT, I WONT GIVE IT YOU

Posted

Why can't it be like the system employed by the Licensed Trade in Public Houses which is endorsed by the Police Force. If a known trouble maker is barred from a given pub for Drunken or disorderly behaviour or substance abuse, the Landlord of that establishment informs ALL other Publicans in the area, along with the Local Police Force of their actions against the offender with the reason for taking that action.

This is legal and above board and protects both Landlords and their customers from known offenders. So why can't this be adopted in the world of pigeons to protect our members from con merchants who feed of the ignorance of those who are not in the know.

Guest youngzimmy
Posted

MEANWHILE I STAND WITH TWO BIDS ON TWO BIRDS OF SUPPOSED INGRAM & LANGTON ORAGIN AND COULD END UP WITH ANY OLD THING FOR THE LACK OF HELP TO SPEAK TO THEM IF THE BOOT WERE ON THE OTHER FOOT I WOULD GO OUT OF MY WAY TO HELP THE VICTIM

 

 

 

Posted
MEANWHILE I STAND WITH TWO BIDS ON TWO BIRDS OF SUPPOSED INGRAM & LANGTON ORAGIN AND COULD END UP WITH ANY OLD THING FOR THE LACK OF HELP TO SPEAK TO THEM

 

Read your P M's, until i get permission the number stays with me, sorry

 

 

Posted
MEANWHILE I STAND WITH TWO BIDS ON TWO BIRDS OF SUPPOSED INGRAM & LANGTON ORAGIN AND COULD END UP WITH ANY OLD THING FOR THE LACK OF HELP TO SPEAK TO THEM

 

Read your P M's, until i get permission the number stays with me, sorry

 

 

Posted
MEANWHILE I STAND WITH TWO BIDS ON TWO BIRDS OF SUPPOSED INGRAM & LANGTON ORAGIN AND COULD END UP WITH ANY OLD THING FOR THE LACK OF HELP TO SPEAK TO THEM IF THE BOOT WERE ON THE OTHER FOOT I WOULD GO OUT OF MY WAY TO HELP THE VICTIM

 

 

 

You have 2 choices my friend, "Pays ya money and take ya chance" or withdraw your bids and say "stick it" I know which one I would choose personally

Guest strapper
Posted
  :-/ would that be a COTTAGE :).

 

 

;D ;D ;D you must have watched the programme too...the name of the building slipped my mind ;)

Posted

I would have been on the phone to the seller,and asked him to e,mail the peds to you :).

Posted
I would have been on the phone to the seller,and asked him to e,mail the peds to you :).

 

That's the problem, he doesn't have a phone number, he has asked for it but not forthcoming

Posted

 

That's the problem, he doesn't have a phone number, he has asked for it but not forthcoming

 

where was this advert? there must have been some phone number or contact?? or how can you bid on them?  :-/

Posted
I would have been on the phone to the seller,and asked him to e,mail the peds to you :).

 

THAT MAY BE THE  PROBLEM, they were sold to our "dubious" friend  WITHOUT PEDIGREES, any pedigrees you get will NOT be from Ingram & Langton, any details must have , if i understand correctly, been added by someone else, why do you think they were removed, you NEVER get a pedigree with Shanes birds, that way you he doesnt get the ring numbers of his stock birds plastered all over the internet (theives in the night and all that)

 

 

Posted

If I or another member accuses someone of something then it is poster that stands to questioned whether it is correct, wrong, just casing trouble or alerting members etc, not the site surely.

I would rather it any accusations for or against me were posted on the site and I was given a chance to prove it right or wrong, back room/PM accusations are worse as you do not know what is being said against you and can cause a lot of trouble for innocent members by people who are out to discredit you, I have personally found this out the hard way and if I was to post the facts I am sure they would be removed :-/

Guest chrisss
Posted

what is the problem about this? he is not banned from this site [as a member] he is not on the banned members list as been banned so since ANDREW HITCHCOCK  is not banned from this site and is able to reply as such would he care to reply?,by the way i still hate the idea of a pm been published [even in a good cause!!!]

Guest chrisss
Posted

since this has now been unlocked i can add a little legal notice on to this, i have in no way repeated any accusations that have been made about him, only naming him as i believed that he was still a member of this site [not left due to mutual agreement]why lock this up and then unlock it again?,and why leave members under the impression that he was banned,and could not be talked about,[ as all banned members are "non people"]when he had left of his [ i assume]  own choice?

Posted
since this has now been unlocked i can add a little legal notice on to this, i have in no way repeated any accusations that have been made about him, only naming him as i believed that he was still a member of this site [not left due to mutual agreement]why lock this up and then unlock it again?,and why leave members under the impression that he was banned,and could not be talked about,[ as all banned members are "non people"]when he had left of his [ i assume]  own choice?

 

And why do you always like to stir chrisss?? yes i unlocked it after a disscussion with mick bowler, and yes i did state he left under mutual consent, as that was the case, and his account was dissabled. He did not leave by his own choice as you put it :-). He cant reply to the accusations, so therefore please leave it :-)

Guest KING BILLY
Posted
its over and done  just leave it  if its locked it will serve no further purpose
you have not got anothr thred locked have you ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Advert: Morray Firth One Loft Classic
  • Advert: M.A.C. Lofts Pigeon Products
  • Advert: RV Woodcraft
  • Advert: B.Leefe & Sons
  • Advert: Apex Garden Buildings
  • Advert: Racing Pigeon Supplies
  • Advert: Solway Feeders


×
×
  • Create New...