Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
well at the very least this scumbag has got 2 years lucky it was not me judgeing him i would have  given him 10years he must be a piece of $hit

 

 

i dont think you like the guy do you

 

 

still he got his just reward

Posted

Its about bloody time that these spineless r holes got their just deserts. I,d have preferred that he be put into a shed and the shed set alight, life for a life eh.

Posted

 

No true but that just makes it all the harder Alan to get something with them ticks in the Convictions box on an application.

 

I applied to be a Postie about 4 years ago and once they were aware of a previous conviction they quickly discarded me as an applicant without asking what conviction it was - Look forward to February though when its 'Spent'THATS WHAT YOU THINK  ;D ;D

 

 

 

Posted
Whilst I understand emotions are running high and equally share your sentiments whole heartily, we should take a moment to appreciate efforts by other parties to secure a conviction and that this culprit (and I use the word in it's most broadest sense) has been given a custodial sentence. Irrespective of whether we consider his sentence to mirror the gravity of his offence and personally I don't, we should reap some satisfaction that any custodial sentence will affect him for the rest of his whole life.  That isn't to say, however, that I wouldn't much rather seem him hung up by his b*lls!

 

Agree with you, heard lots of cases of arson, but this is the only one I've heard with best result - caught & jailed. Shows Law does care and will act when given the chance. Hope it puts a few off doing it, though case needs wider publicity.

Posted

 

Agree with you, heard lots of cases of arson, but this is the only one I've heard with best result - caught & jailed. Shows Law does care and will act when given the chance. Hope it puts a few off doing it, though case needs wider publicity.

 

Ian i have to disagree with you, when it comes to the law cares. If that is so, then why didnt the law act when i had my arson attck last year. They knew who the culprit was yet done sweet fa about it. The police actually said to me "if you can get rid of him, you,ll be doing us all a favour". Why the hell was it left up to me to deal with it?????? The law, when it comes down to it pick and choose they're cases, and as far as i,m concerned my arson attack wasnt a good case to deal with, possibly because they knew that there could be escalating violence from this family involved, who knows.

Posted

Chris mate theres hardly any body has to fill out forms the way it works some one puts the word in for you you go down as a formality and get a start

example the girl who works in our office said her boyfriends just been paid off i said he is a spark will he go off shore i phoned the sparky gaffer he says i have a job but closes today can you get me a cv quick i got him one e-mailed whith in 30mins he was down interview same day letter 2 days later when to go for medical passed start date given  and he is not the first i have gotten in  its not what you know its who you know  its a fact of life

Posted

Have a postman here that suffers from Dilexsia - pefer that spell for the  .... lol -

Well after a short time there was uproar, high and loud as everyone seems to be getting anyone elses mail, anyones, bar their own.

So they talked to him and he told them he couldn't read - NO THIS is a true story -so they took him off the rounds and tried to sack him. But the Union won't hear of it and he is still turning up and walking around the offices a year later. Can't sort or put anything under a heading.

Asked how he got the job in the first places as he couldn't read he replied 'no one ever asked me'! Lol!  So to sack him would be discrimnination! Sorry can't spell lol.  ;) ;D ;D

But it is true!

Posted

Horse whip the bars---d. Make him an example to others and perhaps some of these wild sods will think before they do these terrible things.

Posted

Am just glad that the swine was caught in time before he done some damage to some one else, i think for the damage he done, it wasnt long enought sentence, if i was the man with the white wig, he would have got longer,  but it puts a message out to the others who would try it.

 

And i hope there is a pigeon fancier in there at the time, and heres about what he has done, where he is serving his short spell beats the *expletive removed* oot him.  

Posted

 

Ian i have to disagree with you, when it comes to the law cares. If that is so, then why didnt the law act when i had my arson attck last year. They knew who the culprit was yet done sweet fa about it. The police actually said to me "if you can get rid of him, you,ll be doing us all a favour". Why the hell was it left up to me to deal with it?????? The law, when it comes down to it pick and choose they're cases, and as far as i,m concerned my arson attack wasnt a good case to deal with, possibly because they knew that there could be escalating violence from this family involved, who knows.

 

Given your own personal experience, I am not surprised you take a different view.

 

My thinking was that the defence lawyer tried to trivialise the case in court: 'its only pigeons, no humans were killed'.  The judge didn't wear that, he could have gone along with that argument but didn't. I think he cared that pigeons were killed in this incident, and through that their owner suffered too.

 

Don't have the proper words for you, but the folk you describe rarely get away with it, they usually get humped sooner or later, when natural justice catches up with them - hopefully sooner .  ;) Happened to a whole family of them through this way, they were notorious, well known, crusaded on TV  :(  they got off with everything for years, law got them all in the end for drug dealing, banged them all up. TV were there to capture that too.  ;)

 

 

Posted

 

Given your own personal experience, I am not surprised you take a different view.

 

My thinking was that the defence lawyer tried to trivialise the case in court: 'its only pigeons, no humans were killed'.  The judge didn't wear that, he could have gone along with that argument but didn't. I think he cared that pigeons were killed in this incident, and through that their owner suffered too.

 

Don't have the proper words for you, but the folk you describe rarely get away with it, they usually get humped sooner or later, when natural justice catches up with them - hopefully sooner .  ;) Happened to a whole family of them through this way, they were notorious, well known, crusaded on TV  :(  they got off with everything for years, law got them all in the end for drug dealing, banged them all up. TV were there to capture that too.  ;)

 

 

I just wish all the bad barstools could be got rid off and let the decent folk in life enjoy it. I knew where you were coming from m8, and not getting at you in anyway, far from it. Theyre time will come, i,m sure of it. cheers the now alex.  

Posted

Yes I see the thoughts of a longer, stiffer and a more realistic sentence being passed etc.

Yes i tend to agree ....  :-/ But you know, the whole shebang is up the shute.

Community service for a rapist of an 82 year old woman, and says it was the drugs that caused it  :o :o :o

Not, 'Ah drugs was it eh! ... then you will have another 2 years sentence to run CONSECREtIVELY to the 25 years you should have JUST been sentenced.

Now I feel hot under the collar too.... But when someone slashes a young pretty 16 year old girls face that needs 104 stitches to hold her face back in place, and that only warrents a 6 months suspended sentence, it is I think that the world has gone mad and the Judges have lost their marbles. :o :o

Now if that was my daughter I hear one say 'I'd get life'! Yes you probably would, because acting out a reprisal, taking the 'Law into ones own hands' is deemed far worse than any offence that may have caused one to act as such.

Law and Justices are planets apart here, and that's the sad fact.

Me! I'd have MINIMIUM sentences!

Burglary, 2 years. Rape minum 7 years + Any crime / offence through being on drugs 3 years automatically added. Beat up and robbing A.O.P 7 years, it is armed robbery regardless what mitigation - heavan forbid  when all is said and done.

Drug related crimes - to feed a habbit - 3 years added. Sentences to become law that they are 'Cold turkeyed'!Inside like it or not! Any smuggling of drugs into a prison 3 years. Screws helping / or taking in drugs 15 years.

  Jails are not 'Warehouse to lock up undesirables' they say! eh! Tosh. First law 12 more prisons built and funded. Food down on conveyor belt. No want, go with out. Hunger strikes!  :-/  Be laid out of the way in a coffin  to make it easier with no publicity.

Cold showered always available. Hot twice a week. Back to the 60's of 3 days decent food - nearly -  3 days bread and water and one day nothing. No drugs allowed in ther prison to give the screws a easy quiet time.

Gosh, not many would want to go back in. Some get instituinalised granted. But if they couldn't get their' drugs in prison they would want to go back. - Is easier to get inside for some than outside.

But as it is easy living and pool tables etc. Rehabiltation course (Scams) and T.v and drugs readily available, then there is no detterent. Simple that.

Streets and pigeon lofts would be safe to walk down again.

Now if there was a way M.P.'s could make money sending them to prison, or undiseable immigrants back home, there would be endless shuttle buses day and night!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Advert: Morray Firth One Loft Classic
  • Advert: M.A.C. Lofts Pigeon Products
  • Advert: RV Woodcraft
  • Advert: B.Leefe & Sons
  • Advert: Apex Garden Buildings
  • Advert: Racing Pigeon Supplies
  • Advert: Solway Feeders


×
×
  • Create New...