me

"roland told me ,, you were his star pupil" ae a goat a gowd star an a curtuficat frae the Stanely Unwin corespundunce skool fer inglesh lituare

"forgot you were an english teacher" who telt ye a wis a inglish teecher somwan been clypin agein?

"I THINK THIS IS CORRECT WAS WHAT WAS SAID TODAY" Hey Tammy have you been out for a pint with Roland?

he sent us out a wee letter just after he took over suggesting exactly what Peter Bryant is suggesting spooky or what?

some of the people on this forum are so on the ball its just frightening!!!!!!!!

"who is daft enough to even suggest a time penalty ?" seem to remember Tammy, the President of the SHU suggesting exactly the same thing don't you?

here here Roland somebody had to say it and personally I agree with every word. Although not necessarily in that order!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Well the AGM is over now and there were some dramatic changes" who were the candidates for President and Vice President Tammy?

"Wouldn't pay 50 pence never mind 50 quid" AND YOUR POINT (from the USA) is (I can't fly with them anymore I don't care) Vic Robinson must be birling in his grave listening to some of this stuff all the best to the NFC from the last few real doomen left in Scotland who appreciate real long distance doos!!

you might be a lot of things guys and gals but you ain't "doomen"

Bit disappointed nobody has mentioned Hugh's obituiary in the BHW this week, maybe I am just getting old. He was a great flyer and the very man a lot of guys have been looking for recently on this forum who were wanting to start flying 500 to 600 mile pigeons. He had a reputation second to none for suppling birds that "scored" at the distance for the "NOVICES" who bought his pigeons. Sincere condolences to Hugh's family.

"old hand " was probably just that - THINK ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! there is a difference between ventilation and draughts "keep ypur pigeons in a box " as an old eurpean fancier used to say!! think about it !!!!

"without getting involved with anything, apart from demeaning of ians, ability or integrity , for any one , inluding" me",,,, this i find most shocking " what is the point of posting this Jimmy if you can quote the whole of post 102 surely you can read post 103 here is what I said: "Don't know who "Ian" is Dandydoo/Fifestay and I have no beef with him." Do "me" a favour leave me out.

"It is clear from what I have posted that my information comes from published sources and can be verified by others, while yours comes from your own clouded perception ... how can you truthfully say that you knew what was in the minds of all 300+ people at that meeting? This forum has already a very good grasp of the quality of your 'correct accounts and reports' and as usual, when your chestnuts get roasted, you start trotting out personal insults." very witty Bruno how is the weather in Australia?

"OK YOU WIN have a good season me" believe "me" square peg there have been no winners in the sorry carry-on that has been scottish doos over the last few years. All the best to you as well with the doos when things get going again. God knows we all need a bit of luck with them nowadays.

"THATS ABOUT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING ME ISNT IT" nope was not trying to say that Square Peg what i'm really saying when it gets down to it is if I was you or any other member of fife fed for that matter i would have said to them good riddance i don't need you money to enjoy my hobby and just let them get on with it. if they can't race their doos with us why make them pay for the priviledge it justs smacks of the old "pound of flesh" scenario to me and i personally would be uncomfortable with that if i was a member of fife fed.

"WELL THATS WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN WITH EVERY PROPOSAL AT EVERY MEETING" - Square Peg generally agree with you here Square Peg. The members who left the fed had already stated they would no longer be members of the shu so when the motion fell it could be argued they technically forfeited their membership of the fed. So insisting they have to pay their fees not to be members is a bit silly is it not?

"If people at that meeting hadn't thought that the motion had been won, why did they then write to the BHW 'sad day for democracy, wishes of the majority ignored'? Did they intentionally set out to make public fools of themselves in the letters pages of the pigeon press where it was also made clear in responses that a 2/3 majority was required to carry this motion? And I'm sure a report on the meeting also said that it had to be pointed out that a 2/3 majority was required. Again, I wasn't there, you were. I am posting recollections of 'letters to and reports in the press' following that meeting. There appears to be differing accounts from those who were there. " -Bruno Surely Bruno you have heard the old chestnut advising one to stop digging when in your in a hole. Your right there is two accounts your imagined one and the correct one that people like me who were at the meeting are familiar with. The vote was taken and the club's auditor tallied the votes did a quick calculation and advised the President the motion had failed. The President then announced the result of the ballot to the members present at the meeting. I know this because I was there. Do yourself a favour Bruno lad put away your shovel.

Don't know who "Ian" is Dandydoo/Fifestay and I have no beef with him. This is what you said on the 24/7/06 "We are packing up due to work committments and really not having time to work the Birds as we would like. ---------- We are not going to bother with a big sale or auction ( this decision is killing us)" And this is what you said on the 29/10/06 after you had flogged your doos THE PARTNERHIP I RACED IN IS NOW DISSOLVED WHO SAYS I AM NOT RACING BIRDS AS ME .....BAD INFORMATION Most fair minded people would think these posts were so ever so slightly contradictory and hence the original post a little misleading. And then in your last post you say "Its Folk like you that made the decision to leave the sport easier" I'm sure I am not the only one who is confused. Enjoy your forum just leave me out don"t think thats so terribly much to ask is it?

"First of all the vote for change was supposedly 'won' using straight majority, when in fact this constitution change required a clear 2/3 majority; when that was pointed out at the meeting, the 'status quo' decision was declared 'undemocratic'" -Bruno" this is what you said Bruno and any fair minded person reading it would clearly get the impression that this all happened at the meeting, IT DID NOT I was there you were not the facts are different from what you have posted.

"THE PROPOSAL WAS "FIFE FED TO BE SELF GOVERNING"" am i reading betwen the lines correctly here square peg,was that against a status quo of being "governed" by the shu which some members were not willing to remain members of?

"AS SOON AS THERE PROPASAL FELL ,ALL WALKED OUT " as a matter of interest square peg what proposal was that?

"Part of the 'sham' was attempting to float club membership of any Union [for the SNFC anyway]. First of all the vote for change was supposedly 'won' using straight majority, when in fact this constitution change required a clear 2/3 majority; when that was pointed out at the meeting, the 'status quo' decision was declared 'undemocratic'" -Bruno if this is supposed to relate the SNFC AGM Bruno you obviously were not there I was and your post amounts to complete fabrication somebody has obviously been feeding you this stuff but none of its true.

"ME its not about Fife Fed its about the CLUBS ...it was the CLUBS that debt suspended people who wrote to the FED who wrote to the SHU. " no point in posting these things for me Dandydoo/Fifestay I have already decided not to take any notice of anything you put up after the misleading posts you put up when you were selling your doos.

As a veteran of a few Cowal Games I can assure you the laddies and lassies on "the peninsula" are supreme "artistses" of the "peesch" variety and a good time will be had by all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!