I must agree in principle with a large amount of your discourse. Very few pigeon people either know or care about how a meeting should be conducted, preferring to turn them into debacles where the one who shouts loudest is followed for fear of reprisal. The voting procedure is carried out by Member, not by Club. It has been stated that a rider should have been added to align with the SNFC, but the proposer failed to allow this when advised. In my own Federation, all members receive the Agenda, by mail, sent 14 days before the meeting. The requirement is 7 days. Point 2 is carried out in my own Federation, but only for Management Meetings. The Management Committee is expected to vote as the majority decided at General Meetings. Point 3 is out of order according to SHU rules. Point 4 has greatly improved within my own Federation. We are getting there. Point 5, the Chair decides what the SHU Constitution and Federation Bye Laws are meant to represent. If a member felt this had been decided incorrectly, they have right of appeal to the SHU, but they would have to be sure of their grounds. Point 6 is standard procedure and should be carried out. My own Federation does this. I think your observations only point out the lack of understanding and standards within the pigeon hobby, regarding good Management and Member conduct.