BIGK Posted August 13, 2007 Report Posted August 13, 2007 I am aware some organisations are using the ETS systems already, would it be possible to send me a copy of your rules regarding the systems and how they fit in with others using STB, T3's etc. Thanks
PIGEON_MAN Posted August 14, 2007 Report Posted August 14, 2007 Hi BigK, Are you in the U.K.If so if you have a copy or can get a copy of the RPRA rules you will find that the rules governing ETS are set out in there.Some organisations are trying to bring in their own rules but this is wrong as you cannot make a rule which conflicts with one the RPRA allready as in place.The Scottish union have their own rules regarding ETS which i believe are slightly differant than ours.
BIGK Posted August 14, 2007 Author Report Posted August 14, 2007 Yep I fly in the UNC and our union the NEHU are putting rules together to govern the use of ETS in our area thats why i wondered how others put there rules together to cover both normal rubbered clocked birds and the electronic timing system. Has it caused any problems in clubs/feds already using it??
Pompey Mick Posted August 14, 2007 Report Posted August 14, 2007 i think the RPRA decided to keep Electronic Timing Systems in their own section with their own rules so that all existing Clock rules appertaining to manual clocking with rubbers could remain intact with no alterations necessary.
Roland Posted August 14, 2007 Report Posted August 14, 2007 Hi BigK, Are you in the U.K.If so if you have a copy or can get a copy of the RPRA rules you will find that the rules governing ETS are set out in there.Some organisations are trying to bring in their own rules but this is wrong as you cannot make a rule which conflicts with one the RPRA allready as in place.The Scottish union have their own rules regarding ETS which i believe are slightly differant than ours. Not true mucker, they can't bring in rules that override, omitt their rules etc. But any club / Fed can bring in rules that co -- exist, or run with theirs. Indeed every local law runs in conjuction with, or doesn't contravene the RPRA rules. Then they are binding and law abiding. Indeed would be enforced by the RPRA if any person fell foul of them!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now