Roland Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 :-/ :-/ :-/ Wondering .... :-/ If I do a crusade on his behalf :-/ Will I also get some free pigeons ;D ;D ;D Seriously though, it isn't so much the context, but the manner it is put over I believe. Always told - not now a days of course with these stupid ettiquette rules, that you could call some one a B*******d as long as you smile. :B Been close a few times myself I believe, like a few others to being barred. So I feel it is alright to disagree, but not to be disagreeable. Don't of course know why, or how.... was Welsh of course, but tha in it's self... Nah ;D ;D But the truth of the matter is that we are al summising! Yes he was,a prevalent poster. Yes he certainly has his views, and stated them. But that in it's self will never get anyone banned on here. Nor getting under someones skin, or being truthful. Even upsetting a Moddy, or speaking close to the wind. These are the facts. Another fact is, as of yet, we don't know any facts! But somewhere, sometime, we all over step the mark I guess, and once in a while by a long chalk. Will miss him while his in the Sn B :Bin' though
Fair Play Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 Lets see if anyone has the B---- to give an answer to any of the concerns regarding this topic I think the rank and file are due it
Guest MIKE1957 Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 :-/ :-/ :-/ Wondering .... :-/ If I do a crusade on his behalf :-/ Will I also get some free pigeons ;D ;D ;D Seriously though, it isn't so much the context, but the manner it is put over I believe. Always told - not now a days of course with these stupid ettiquette rules, that you could call some one a B*******d as long as you smile. :B Been close a few times myself I believe, like a few others to being barred. So I feel it is alright to disagree, but not to be disagreeable. Don't of course know why, or how.... was Welsh of course, but tha in it's self... Nah ;D ;D But the truth of the matter is that we are al summising! Yes he was,a prevalent poster. Yes he certainly has his views, and stated them. But that in it's self will never get anyone banned on here. Nor getting under someones skin, or being truthful. Even upsetting a Moddy, or speaking close to the wind. These are the facts. Another fact is, as of yet, we don't know any facts! But somewhere, sometime, we all over step the mark I guess, and once in a while by a long chalk. Will miss him while his in the Sn B :Bin' though well hopefully we will be told why he got blacklisted and not have to speculate
bambam Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 hes got banned because the webmaster does not like anybody that does not toe the line or tells the truth ZEIG HEIL
Roland Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 hes got banned because the webmaster does not like anybody that does not toe the line or tells the truth ZEIG HEIL Not just untrue, but very unrealistic. Gosh you will be saying because he was such a good speller next! ;D ;D
superstar Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 Not just untrue, but very unrealistic. Gosh you will be saying because he was such a good speller next! ;D ;D You obviously dont know what a lot of us do then roland
just ask me Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 well from what ive seen members dont get banned for noting dont know anything about this case and in fairness the webmaster cant tell us i could be wrong on that of course but what goes on between the webmaster and Chris should stay that way i feel unless they agree between them both to say what happened just what i think
Guest MIKE1957 Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 well from what ive seen members dont get banned for noting dont know anything about this case and in fairness the webmaster cant tell us i could be wrong on that of course but what goes on between the webmaster and Chris should stay that way i feel unless they agree between them both to say what happened just what i think well i think someone could come on and say something
Guest bigda Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 who reported him, looked at his post, don't see anything wrong with them, told the truth,and had it out with tracker, in his last post, is the site selective, maybe the mods can say, what rule he has broke as to get a red-carded, they have another web page as you are aware of and of its presence, and it will not go away, if they have told the truth, running or ruining the site i see dovesy had 8,000 posted threads on here 3rd highest poster Chris had given plenty to this site charity work, novice help, web help, the both have been on here for a good 8 years collectively how long do these bans last are they weekly, monthly, a shame realy :-/
Guest MIKE1957 Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 who reported him, looked at his post, don't see anything wrong with them, told the truth,and had it out with tracker, in his last post, is the site selective, maybe the mods can say, what rule he has broke as to get a red-carded, they have another web page as you are aware of and of its presence, and it will not go away, if they have told the truth, running or ruining the site i see dovesy had 8,000 posted threads on here 3rd highest poster Chris had given plenty to this site charity work, novice help, web help, the both have been on here for a good 8 years collectively how long do these bans last are they weekly, monthly, a shame realy :-/ ive just read is last posts and i cant see a reason to get blacklisted... i really dont understand this site
Guest MIKE1957 Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 well that pole lasted a long time
Guest cowboy Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 well that pole lasted a long time got my vote in ;D
superstar Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 well that pole lasted a long time Just another example of heirachy seeing what they dont want to. Censored to the max here simple as that how many more examples do you all need
Guest MIKE1957 Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 Just another example of heirachy seeing what they dont want to. Censored to the max here simple as that how many more examples do you all need im surprised they havent taken this Thread of aswell
Webmaster Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 As I've said before I'm not going to publicly comment on any member, violation or conduct. I can assure members that this decision wasn't taken frivolously.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now