Guest bigda Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 i think it was a bad move from the national to allow Pilgrims to race with them, as i personally think it altered the results, and for the poor bloke that only flys the national he was denied some corn money and higher positions, they normally hold there own in a level playing Field, but this year with so much one sided favor, it was harder to get on the result as to the way the race was dominated IMO it should not happen again in all fairness to races
Guest Greig the doo Drysdale Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 i think it was a bad move from the national to allow Pilgrims to race with them, as i personally think it altered the results, and for the poor bloke that only flys the national he was denied some corn money and higher positions, they normally hold there own in a level playing Field, but this year with so much one sided favor, it was harder to get on the result as to the way the race was dominated IMO it should not happen again in all fairness to races Surely its better for the birds as they are all coming up the country at the same time My thoughts that all Scottish feds should be racing agains each other every week as 1 big national
Guest bigda Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 Surely its better for the birds as they are all coming up the country at the same time My thoughts that all Scottish feds should be racing agains each other every week as 1 big national yes maybe, but when the bloke was setting, his champs up no one told him, what he was up against till the last minute as to who they are, or how Manny they fly then allow bed hoping in to the bargain, is a very bad move in my eyes, but then again its only my opinion :o
frank-123 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 i think it was a bad move from the national to allow Pilgrims to race with them, as i personally think it altered the results, and for the poor bloke that only flys the national he was denied some corn money and higher positions, they normally hold there own in a level playing Field, but this year with so much one sided favor, it was harder to get on the result as to the way the race was dominated IMO it should not happen again in all fairness to races i was worried up you thought you had stop posting bull but your back to your best ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
pjc Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 surely if somebody has prepared there ace team of winners for the national and then the national convoy and liberate some more birds from the same geographic area it should be a help! Maybe there were just pushed down the result list because they were not good enough! Sounds like sour grapes to me!
Guest Gareth Rankin Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 i was worried up you thought you had stop posting bull but your back to your best ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D In bigda's case it looks like the spaceship has touched down once again from planet Mars.
Guest bigda Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 In bigda's case it looks like the spaceship has touched down once again from planet Mars. sorry :Xto see you reply Gareth, as it has had an adverse affect on your normal dominance of the national, i am just trying to enlighten the members that is very important to attened agms ;) as get your voice herd, thanks bart for the support as you know i am right once again
alec guinness Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 i think it was a bad move from the national to allow Pilgrims to race with them, as i personally think it altered the results, and for the poor bloke that only flys the national he was denied some corn money and higher positions, they normally hold there own in a level playing Field, but this year with so much one sided favor, it was harder to get on the result as to the way the race was dominated IMO it should not happen again in all fairness to races [/quote sorry bigda dont really understand what you are on about. :-/ :-/
Chris Little Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 What's the problem here, the more the merrier I say
Guest bigda Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 i think the race was controled by numbers this year and find it hard that a lot of members, did not realise the effect it had, but i am sure they wil get my drift
Guest stb Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 i think it was a bad move from the national to allow Pilgrims to race with them, as i personally think it altered the results, and for the poor bloke that only flys the national he was denied some corn money and higher positions, they normally hold there own in a level playing Field, but this year with so much one sided favor, it was harder to get on the result as to the way the race was dominated IMO it should not happen again in all fairness to races surely you want as much competition to race against at top level as you can not cutting out other fanciers in a national so that you get a better prize. the pilgrims could have put there birds through the national as im sure some would have done so it makes no difference.
Chris Little Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 Can someone explain what this topic is about please :-/
alec guinness Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 Can someone explain what this topic is about please :-/ i must be thick aswell chris. ;D
Guest bigda Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 COME ON BIGDA SPIT IT OUT nogan :Don't be taken in by them, they have my drift on the situation they are not as green as they are cabbage and know fine well, when and how to pull a stroke in there favor. thank god i had the : sense to see it unfold, but hope it get sorted out at the next agm as i say i am here to help the weak, and also to help the ones on here who are finding this hard to under stand, but if they read the topic often enough the penny might just drop :X bigda here to help
JADE Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 i think what he is trying to say is that there are guys on the national result who would not have been at the race had it not been in their federation programme. i e. convoyed by snfc and duplicated into fed. not sure what the problem is as it increases the national entry and the cream always rises to the top as usual and if it means regular national flyers being pushed down the result so be it
caitlin Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 i think what he is trying to say is that there are guys on the national result who would not have been at the race had it not been in their federation programme. i e. convoyed by snfc and duplicated into fed. not sure what the problem is as it increases the national entry and the cream always rises to the top as usual and if it means regular national flyers being pushed down the result so be it every fed should go with the nat the ones that dont want 2 are the ones that cant win in the nat and are showing up how poor they are
Guest bigda Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 i think what he is trying to say is that there are guys on the national result who would not have been at the race had it not been in their federation programme. i e. convoyed by snfc and duplicated into fed. not sure what the problem is as it increases the national entry and the cream always rises to the top as usual and if it means regular national flyers being pushed down the result so be it well done jade, you are not to slow after all, but there are plenty of old foxes on here, know when to keep there gobs shut but i"ll suffer on, and expose when i can, them old dogs will soon know there is a new "cub" in town
Guest stb Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 i think what he is trying to say is that there are guys on the national result who would not have been at the race had it not been in their federation programme. i e. convoyed by snfc and duplicated into fed. not sure what the problem is as it increases the national entry and the cream always rises to the top as usual and if it means regular national flyers being pushed down the result so be itif you read the first post he says the pilgrims should not be allowed ie feds duplicating as its doing people out of prizes??
Guest numpty01 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 well far from me to comment but i heard the boys in the east aint happy with the pilgims anyhow ;D ;D ;D
Chris Little Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 Like it or not, feds going along with national clubs is here to stay. Solway Fed have been going with the SNFC to the last channel race for years now, 2004 rings a bell
frank-123 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 well far from me to comment but i heard the boys in the east aint happy with the pilgims anyhow ;D ;D ;D the boys in the east will be back as strong as ever next season
Guest Posted July 21, 2009 Report Posted July 21, 2009 the boys in the east will be back as strong as ever next season Was having a look at the result from Guernsey SNFC 1948 the other night,it was dominated by the west also the pool money was unbelievable.11th open £450 that was a small fortune back then,just goes to show how the BOP in them hills have changed things.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now