Guest bakes Posted October 16, 2009 Report Posted October 16, 2009 i personaly dont vaccinate for paratyphoid dont see the point for doing it for the sake of doing it like IB says defra reckon there is no problems with it in this country . what i do is give a so called 4 in 1 pill thats pro active and negitave agaist para its also for canker thats why i give them it twice a year. about salmonella bob macdonald got it years ago and after consulting proberly the bet pigeon vets there is knowing bob . had to cull a heap of doos as he was told there is no cure for it . is it called DACOXINE 4 IN 1 you give them mate for coxxi,canker,ecoli, Paratyphoid all the best
Kyleakin Lofts Posted October 16, 2009 Report Posted October 16, 2009 Seems like a lot of "facts" are coming up stating this is not a problem in this country. It is also accepted that when it does occur, there are always exceptions to the rule, there is no cure and sadly only a cull is left, which must be heartbreaking. If this is the case, why the debate? These "facts" are being given, yet fanciers are ignoring them and seeking out cures at no little expense. Why are they not consulting the proper agencies? Is there the possibility that once our birds reach the continent, where this is a problem, the risk rises and they being more subject to risk subsequently cause the exception to the rule cases we are hearing about? If this is the case, does this warrant vaccination? I feel these are the questions we should be asking and hopefully someone somewhere has the answers.
Kyleakin Lofts Posted October 16, 2009 Report Posted October 16, 2009 Seems like a lot of "facts" are coming up stating this is not a problem in this country. It is also accepted that when it does occur, there are always exceptions to the rule, there is no cure and sadly only a cull is left, which must be heartbreaking. If this is the case, why the debate? These "facts" are being given, yet fanciers are ignoring them and seeking out cures at no little expense. Why are they not consulting the proper agencies? Is there the possibility that once our birds reach the continent, where this is a problem, the risk rises and they being more subject to risk subsequently cause the exception to the rule cases we are hearing about? If this is the case, does this warrant vaccination? I feel these are the questions we should be asking and hopefully someone somewhere has the answers.
sammy Posted October 16, 2009 Report Posted October 16, 2009 way back in 198/2/3 when paramyxovirus came to these sure and union held meeting for compulsary vaccination top vet at the time think name was mcrea stated at meeting that when paramyxovirus is present then salmanell is also present dont get one without the other and the think about it is its hard to detect during aurtopsy and does not always show up on issolation and thats FACT
robbiedoo. Posted October 16, 2009 Report Posted October 16, 2009 yes bates its daxoine thats all they get .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now