fraud

[johno]

bruno you have arrogantly closed apost claiming that tha content was basically alleging fraud and that the site may be held legally responsible. if members would like to look at page 38 bhw 23 march 2007 shu report joe murphy they will see what i have written is replicated from mr murphys report. i refer to guidline of awards for all and again if anyone wants to look go to the web site. where is the allegation of fraud. you are the only one who is mentioning fraud. are you insinuating that the contents of mr murphys report or even better the content of the awards for all guidelines are fraudulent?

[ALF]

Bit over the top here Johno have to agree with Bruno on this wan!!!

[johno]

in what way alf. what is over the top?

[ALF]

6 new threads today all basicly about the same thing and all started by your good self

[johno]

alf the threads have been started because bruno closes each one that does not suit down. i have only posted what is contained in joe murphys report in the bhw. i have only used the guidelines of awards for all. do you think it is wrong  to post what mr murphy had printed in the book?

[ALF]

Not at all but i think you've made your point

[johno]

you can only mak a point if you are given a chance. bruno is determined to take that opportunity away from anyone who does not fall into line.

[Guest]

bruno you have arrogantly closed apost claiming that tha content was basically alleging fraud and that the site may be held legally responsible. if members would like to look at page 38 bhw 23 march 2007 shu report joe murphy they will see what i have written is replicated from mr murphys report. i refer to guidline of awards for all and again if anyone wants to look go to the web site. where is the allegation of fraud. you are the only one who is mentioning fraud. are you insinuating that the contents of mr murphys report or even better the content of the awards for all guidelines are fraudulent?

 

This is part of your post. It is quite clear from these statements that you are accusing the SHU of a fraudulent application for an Awards for All Lottery Grant.

 

Luckily for you:

 

organisations with more than £20,000 income CAN apply,

profits don't pay wages, they are what is left after wages etc are paid.

shu doesn't have shareholders so doesn't needmake profits to pay them dividends,

 

 

"as i have taken the opportunity to have a look at awards for all guidelines i am extremely concerned that the rules laid down have been ignored."

 

=Fraud

 

"in order to apply for a grant a few conditions have to be met. a)an individual cannot apply no organisation with a turnover of more than 20000 annually will receive an award or can qualify for an award. the shu turnover is always in excess of 20000. the last three years average is around 80000. "

 

=Fraud

 

"the shu charges five times what it pays for rings. this is done to make a profit to pay wages etc. the shu makes profit from selling ties rubber rings books seals stationery etc etc. so is certainly a profit making organisation."

 

=Fraud