ChrisMaidment08 Posted May 26, 2008 Author Report Posted May 26, 2008 shares at 0 payable to local charity this is not about money
jimmy white Posted May 26, 2008 Report Posted May 26, 2008 shu ruling is the owner must CLAIM the pigeon within 7 days . but dont know w h u ruling ,, but am wondering if this was a fancier or non-fancier , if it was a non-fancier, how did he know it was £30?? either way, you would think a gesture of good will would be in order
ChrisMaidment08 Posted May 26, 2008 Author Report Posted May 26, 2008 no he is a fancier same fed as pres
jimmy white Posted May 26, 2008 Report Posted May 26, 2008 apologise,,,i didnt read second post properly , so this was a non fancier ,,,if the whu dont alter that rule [or be more specific] i think this guy will be looking for more to report :-/
ChrisMaidment08 Posted May 26, 2008 Author Report Posted May 26, 2008 he is a fancer if thats what you can call him
jimmy white Posted May 26, 2008 Report Posted May 26, 2008 no he is a fancier same fed as pres so he WAS a fancier ,,,,,,the second post threw me??? i think the fancier concerned should hang his head in shame , i think most decent fanciers would try and get the birds they report back to the owner, as cheap as poss and as quick as poss and the same vica versa :-/ i,e by transporter [going near] or trainer going that way etc etc
ChrisMaidment08 Posted May 26, 2008 Author Report Posted May 26, 2008 i wish i could put his name here
thunderboult Posted May 26, 2008 Report Posted May 26, 2008 what club is the guy who charged you in ?
ChrisMaidment08 Posted May 26, 2008 Author Report Posted May 26, 2008 what club is the guy who charged you in ? crumlin i beleave south wales
Lennut Tar Posted May 27, 2008 Report Posted May 27, 2008 i wish i could put his name here We don't mind one little bit ;D ;D ;D you just go right ahead now "LMFAO" & we all will know what a ???? he is etc. He should hang his head in shame in my view & he hasn't got a clue !!!!!!!!!!!! what this sport is all about I'm afraid. Enjoy.
THE FIFER Posted May 27, 2008 Report Posted May 27, 2008 Rules are passed by the clubs and it,s members so its up to them to change it,the president is only carrying out is job correctly. exactly, its the members who run organisations, and make and change the rules.
Guest strapper Posted May 27, 2008 Report Posted May 27, 2008 i live near the crumlin club and i personally cannot believe that a fellow fancier would stoop so low to charge another fancier .especially living within a small distance away? we dont know all the circumstances and only hearing one side of the story. chris am i right in saying u live in monmouth? can u name the fancier who has charged u?, as i know a few from that club . the only reason that i could think of anyone would charge, would be if the (owner of the pigeon becoming difficult with the person reporting the bird)., in the manner well if u wanna be like that attitude.
Roland Posted May 27, 2008 Report Posted May 27, 2008 Was a fellow upto about 1o years ago that use to catch the Ferals etc. Any Rung he kept till enough in that area. Caught last thing night - early morning, Culled the ferals and went delivering to owners in day time.... YES he charged the full going rate, made a great profit too of course. Dearer than amtrak - yet more reliable eh! (lol ;D) and YOU had to accept! RPRA had to back him to the hilt of course. Ah well I guess that's enterptrise eh!
Roland Posted May 27, 2008 Report Posted May 27, 2008 Of course HE was paid by Councils / Buisnesses to clear the birds in the first place!
Guest strapper Posted May 27, 2008 Report Posted May 27, 2008 chris ,i believe u havent been telling the guys on here the whole story? isnt it right that ur bird was reported to the whpu wronglly?, and it was sent for by someone that was told it was their bird,only to find out it was ur bird but the number was wrongly reported? on finding out this, the guy who had sent for this bird by amtrak?, found out it was ur bird then u had to pay him the £30 he had paid for ur bird?to be returned..and to add a little more, didnt the cheque u sent him bounce? and u was suspended by the whpu? i feel that the members on here should understand and not be mislead that there are two sides to this story and this im lead to believe is the true version., if this is not th true record of the case then i appolgise .
ChrisMaidment08 Posted May 27, 2008 Author Report Posted May 27, 2008 well strapper are you one of the idicots with pres 1 whu informed me it was also not my bird 2 the fanicer could not produce any evidance of payment towhu or myself the person reporting bird said it was his not mine wrong colour 3bounce chegue no wrong chegue book you want the truth youseem to know so much i have all paper work 4 suspended yes because un like some i wont have the p taken by abunch of dictators but if u were in that meeting were was the gentlely conduct to a non fanicer or truie facts pres shouting all through he is guilty strapper i have nothing to hide thats why my name not alies on this so you think on this when the whu does it to you you never questioned the rule
Guest strapper Posted May 27, 2008 Report Posted May 27, 2008 well strapper are you one of the idicots with pres 1 whu informed me it was also not my bird 2 the fanicer could not produce any evidance of payment towhu or myself the person reporting bird said it was his not mine wrong colour 3bounce chegue no wrong chegue book you want the truth youseem to know so much i have all paper work 4 suspended yes because un like some i wont have the p taken by abunch of dictators but if u were in that meeting were was the gentlely conduct to a non fanicer or truie facts pres shouting all through he is guilty strapper i have nothing to hide thats why my name not alies on this so you think on this when the whu does it to you you never questioned the rule im not one of the idiots chris,i just thought the others needed to know more about the situation,i personally wasnt there,but i have seen the minutes of the meeting and thats y i have stated if im wrong then i appollogise,but i think if ur gonna start moaning about the whpu then let fanciers know wots behind ur grievience and then maybe u will have more siding with u. as in this case,i didnt think u gave the fanciers on here all the story,wasnt trying to be little u ,just trying to point out theres always two sides to any story.
Guest Vic Posted May 27, 2008 Report Posted May 27, 2008 Some crap in the game, these days. Aint there? (wink).
ChrisMaidment08 Posted May 27, 2008 Author Report Posted May 27, 2008 strapper like i said ihave all paperwork whu started all this fancier has done this yes if a misstake was made it was whu let me remind you the pres had a bird payed for by whu i can prove that to as along time fancier i have never come across such a waster as the fancier i took an excutive film producer as my rep you saw my apology in hw, pm me and i will send you true record of meeting you make youer own mind up fancier s who know me know i am stright down the line i stated on this site i payed 30 and the rules read the rule then let me know when youer picking strays up and pay30 with person claims to have costs but no proof the whu will also suspend you if you make a mistake but then you never proved someone a lier i did
ChrisMaidment08 Posted May 27, 2008 Author Report Posted May 27, 2008 sorry strapper i read letter it sounds im being personal at you but the minutes you saw were only half the whu recaived true record by e mail that was not put to com on pres orders
ChrisMaidment08 Posted May 27, 2008 Author Report Posted May 27, 2008 i live near the crumlin club and i personally cannot believe that a fellow fancier would stoop so low to charge another fancier .especially living within a small distance away? we dont know all the circumstances and only hearing one side of the story. chris am i right in saying u live in monmouth? can u name the fancier who has charged u?, as i know a few from that club . the only reason that i could think of anyone would charge, would be if the (owner of the pigeon becoming difficult with the person reporting the bird)., in the manner well if u wanna be like that attitude. you knew fancier now who is misleading who
ChrisMaidment08 Posted May 27, 2008 Author Report Posted May 27, 2008 plus you would have seen all matters on this subject
flighty hen Posted May 27, 2008 Report Posted May 27, 2008 I agree with strapper, so let's get this story right, this bird was reported wrongly to the whpu by the finder, the owner as such sent for the bird and paid amtrak £30, who then seen the ring number was wrong and reported to whpu and found out the bird belonged to Chris Maidment, who then paid the £30 back and the cheque bounced. I am led to believe that the fancier concerned did have proof of payment to amtrak. So yes there's always two sides to every story and yes we've all read the minutes
Guest strapper Posted May 27, 2008 Report Posted May 27, 2008 you knew fancier now who is misleading who chris i dont know who the fancier is ur on about!!,like i said i live near as in near, and not in same town!
pjc Posted May 27, 2008 Report Posted May 27, 2008 Why do people start threads with one side of a story, usualy the side that makes them look in the right? Phil
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now