Justice

[Blue Chequer Pied]

Rangers began their route to the final by beating Stade Rennes 2–1 on aggregate. The first leg was drawn 1–1 with Willie Johnston scoring for Rangers. Rangers won the return leg 1–0 through Alex MacDonald. The second round saw Rangers play Sporting Lisbon from Portugal. Rangers led the first half of the first leg 3–0, but lost two goals in the second half to lead 3–2 going into the second leg. The second leg finished 3–2 to Sporting, 5–5 on aggregate. Willie Henderson scored for Rangers in extra time but Rangers then lost a goal with six minutes left to make it 6–6 on aggregate. What followed has been described as being one of the most bizarre incidents in the history of any European tournament.[1] The Dutch referee Laurens van Raavens failed to recognise that Rangers, having scored three away goals to Sporting's two, had won the tie. But the referee made both teams take five penalties each, with Rangers losing the shootout. After Rangers manager Willie Waddell pointed out the away goals rule to UEFA, the referee was overruled, the result overturned and Rangers were heading into the next round.[1] Rangers then played Torino, Italian league leaders at the time, and won 2–1 on aggregate. In the semi final Rangers played Bayern Munich, who had beaten Rangers in the final five years previously in Nuremberg. Rangers progressed 3–1 on aggregate to reach their third European final.

 

As it is, here for the Bears

[Guest bigda]

the away team get the bonus of the chance of another away goal

as the home team get the bonus of playing the extra 30 minutes at home

 

we will just have to agree to disagree m8

 

but to win the game you have to win it by 2 clear goals if you are the home team, where as the rule says a goal a head, nulifys the away goal.

[Blue Chequer Pied]

but to win the game you have to win it by 2 clear goals if you are the home team, where as the rule says a goal a head, nulifys the away goal.

 

expletive remove Danny where have you ever had to win a footie game by 2 goals. The away goal only comes into effect in the event of a draw. A team could score 9 away goals but its counts for naff all if they get beat 10-9..... or would the team that scored 10 lose as they didn't get 11 Are you not getting confused with Tennis wherby you have to win a deciding set by 2 clear games

 

As it is.... you know the rest

[Guest bigda]

expletive remove Danny where have you ever had to win a footie game by 2 goals. The away goal only comes into effect in the event of a draw. A team could score 9 away goals but its counts for naff all if they get beat 10-9..... or would the team that scored 10 lose as they didn't get 11 Are you not getting confused with Tennis wherby you have to win a deciding set by 2 clear games

 

As it is.... you know the rest

 

WELL READ THE THREAD THEN, SPORTING WON THE SECOND GAME 4-3 AND RANGERS CLAIM THE AWAY GOAL THE WINNER.

[Guest bigda]

Rangers began their route to the final by beating Stade Rennes 2–1 on aggregate. The first leg was drawn 1–1 with Willie Johnston scoring for Rangers. Rangers won the return leg 1–0 through Alex MacDonald. The second round saw Rangers play Sporting Lisbon from Portugal. Rangers led the first half of the first leg 3–0, but lost two goals in the second half to lead 3–2 going into the second leg. The second leg finished 3–2 to Sporting, 5–5 on aggregate. Willie Henderson scored for Rangers in extra time but Rangers then lost a goal with six minutes left to make it 6–6 on aggregate. What followed has been described as being one of the most bizarre incidents in the history of any European tournament.[1] The Dutch referee Laurens van Raavens failed to recognise that Rangers, having scored three away goals to Sporting's two, had won the tie. But the referee made both teams take five penalties each, with Rangers losing the shootout. After Rangers manager Willie Waddell pointed out the away goals rule to UEFA, the referee was overruled, the result overturned and Rangers were heading into the next round.[1] Rangers then played Torino, Italian league leaders at the time, and won 2–1 on aggregate. In the semi final Rangers played Bayern Munich, who had beaten Rangers in the final five years previously in Nuremberg. Rangers progressed 3–1 on aggregate to reach their third European final.

 

As it is, here for the Bears

 

ON THE SECOND LEG THE GAME FINISHED AFTER EXTRA TIME 4-3 THAT WAS THE END OF THE AWAY GOAL

AND THAT IS WHY THE PENALTY'S SHOULD HAVE STAYED. AS I SAID FOR SPORTING TO WIN IT THEY WOULD HAVE NEED 2 GOALS MORE WHEN THE GAME WAS ALL SQUARE 6 EACH YOU USED UP THE AWAY GOAL TO GET EXTRA TIME IN THE FIRST PLACE.

[Blue Chequer Pied]

WELL READ THE THREAD THEN, SPORTING WON THE SECOND GAME 4-3 AND RANGERS CLAIM THE AWAY GOAL THE WINNER.

 

Yes but they were at home expletive remove and lost the first game at Ibrox 3-2. Therefor they scored 2 away goals and Rangers scored 3 away goals...... Now can you do the sums?

 

As it is, here for the Bears

[DJWa]

ON THE SECOND LEG THE GAME FINISHED AFTER EXTRA TIME 4-3 THAT WAS THE END OF THE AWAY GOAL

AND THAT IS WHY THE PENALTY'S SHOULD HAVE STAYED. AS I SAID FOR SPORTING TO WIN IT THEY WOULD HAVE NEED 2 GOALS MORE WHEN THE GAME WAS ALL SQUARE 6 EACH YOU USED UP THE AWAY GOAL TO GET EXTRA TIME IN THE FIRST PLACE.

 

jeez danny you must be at the wind up

 

are you making this up as you go

[Guest stb-]

jeez danny you must be at the wind up

 

are you making this up as you go

fiddling the rules now at least thats a progresion

[Blue Chequer Pied]

ON THE SECOND LEG THE GAME FINISHED AFTER EXTRA TIME 4-3 THAT WAS THE END OF THE AWAY GOAL

AND THAT IS WHY THE PENALTY'S SHOULD HAVE STAYED. AS I SAID FOR SPORTING TO WIN IT THEY WOULD HAVE NEED 2 GOALS MORE WHEN THE GAME WAS ALL SQUARE 6 EACH YOU USED UP THE AWAY GOAL TO GET EXTRA TIME IN THE FIRST PLACE.

 

You need help man. It was 5-5 on aggregate after 180 mins with both teams recording a 3-2 home win. As a result at this stage away goals did not come into effect as both teams had scored 2 away goals at this point. Hence the reason for extra time. The fact that Rangers scored another AWAY goal in extra time meant that they went through on away goals (3 for the gets and 2 for sporting) and the penalties should never have happened.

 

As it is

[Guest bigda]

Yes but they were at home expletive remove and lost the first game at Ibrox 3-2. Therefor they scored 2 away goals and Rangers scored 3 away goals...... Now can you do the sums?

 

As it is, here for the Bears

 

IT WAS ALL SQAURE FIRST GAME 3-2 SECOND GAME 3-2 THAT MEANT NO AWAY GOAL COUNTED AFTER 90 MIN, SO EXTRA TIME, AFTER EXTRA TIME THE SCORE NOW READS

4-3 TO SPORTING , THAT GOAL THEY SCORED NOW WIPES, OUT THE AWAY GOAL RULE MAKING IT PENALTYS THEY TAKE THEM AND WIN THEM BUT RANGERS WANT ANOTHER GOAL FROM SOME WHERE THAT THEY AINT GOT

[Blue Chequer Pied]

IT WAS ALL SQAURE FIRST GAME 3-2 SECOND GAME 3-2 THAT MEANT NO AWAY GOAL COUNTED AFTER 90 MIN, SO EXTRA TIME, AFTER EXTRA TIME THE SCORE NOW READS

4-3 TO SPORTING , THAT GOAL THEY SCORED NOW WIPES, OUT THE AWAY GOAL RULE MAKING IT PENALTYS THEY TAKE THEM AND WIN THEM BUT RANGERS WANT ANOTHER GOAL FROM SOME WHERE THAT THEY AINT GOT

 

 

Danny you are wrong again. This might make it easier for you to understand Rangers goals on the left .....

 

 

Round

 

Opponents

 

First leg

 

Second leg

 

Aggregate score

 

 

 

First round

 

Stade Rennes

 

1–1 (a)

 

1–0 (h)

 

2–1

 

 

 

Second round

 

Sporting Lisbon

 

3–2 (h)

 

3–4 (a) AET

 

6–6

 

 

 

Quarter-finals

 

Torino

 

1–1 (a)

 

1–0 (h)

 

2–1

 

 

 

Semi-finals

 

Bayern Munich

 

1–1 (a)

 

2–0 (h)

 

3–1

[Blue Chequer Pied]

Danny read this.... but it could be a big conspiracy right enough!

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_European_Cup_Winners'_Cup_Final

[Guest stb-]

Danny read this.... but it could be a big conspiracy right enough!

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_European_Cup_Winners'_Cup_Final

no point in exsplaining they only understand brown envelopes in the back door

 

Danny read this.... but it could be a big conspiracy right enough!

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_European_Cup_Winners'_Cup_Final

did thewy have the penalties after the trophy presentation and pitch invasion on this occasion

[Blue Chequer Pied]

no point in exsplaining they only understand brown envelopes in the back door

 

 

The big problem is he seems to be unable to count to 6!

[Guest bigda]

Danny read this.... but it could be a big conspiracy right enough!

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_European_Cup_Winners'_Cup_Final

 

but what was not mentioned was the score as the way it panned out after extra time 4-3 it was that score that sporting would then have to win by 2 goals instead of the one goal as it was 6 each as stated and the away goal on the day was counted twice as it was used to get the extra time game sporting pulled the game back to all square 6-6 with there 4-3 win that how rangers got away with it the away rule saved them but sporting could not win unless the result was by 2 clear goals like a 5 3 win so 2 goals needed from all square game and should you then add up the goals it would read 8 for sporting and 6 to rangers

Edited August 10, 2014 by bigda

[VMS]

Think it's time to have a another trophy to go with basics fancier ov the year.basics lowest IQ ov the year can only be one out standing candidate :emoticon-0167-beer:

[Guest bigda]

Think it's time to have a another trophy to go with basics fancier ov the year.basics lowest IQ ov the year can only be one out standing candidate :emoticon-0167-beer:

 

did yer maw hit under the bed a kick to get you out

[VMS]

Common basics lets be fair here give Danny his award it's the only trophy he'll get this year

[DJWa]

but what was not mentioned was the score as the way it panned out after extra time 4-3 it was that score that sporting would then have to win by 2 goals instead of the one goal as it was 6 each as stated and the away goal on the day was counted twice as it was used to get the extra time game sporting pulled the game back to all square 6-6 with there 4-3 win that how rangers got away with it the away rule saved them but sporting could not win unless the result was by 2 clear goals like a 5 3 win so 2 goals needed from all square game and should you then add up the goals it would read 8 for sporting and 6 to rangers

 

count again danny sporting scored 2 away goals at ibrox

plus the 5-3 they would of needed to win the tie overall 5 + 2 = 7 not 8

 

 

so 7-6

[Blue Chequer Pied]

but what was not mentioned was the score as the way it panned out after extra time 4-3 it was that score that sporting would then have to win by 2 goals instead of the one goal as it was 6 each as stated and the away goal on the day was counted twice as it was used to get the extra time game sporting pulled the game back to all square 6-6 with there 4-3 win that how rangers got away with it the away rule saved them but sporting could not win unless the result was by 2 clear goals like a 5 3 win so 2 goals needed from all square game and should you then add up the goals it would read 8 for sporting and 6 to rangers

 

 

How do you manage to find your way home every day

[Guest TAMMY_1]

her wan for yi danny boy that a found might interest yi :emoticon-0136-giggle:

 

 

 

 

We have a pigeon 4 wheel trailer approx. 10ft 6 in long x6ft 6in wide with curtain sides quick release system and watering facility only used twice this season for open races and is too small for our needs comes complete with 32 crates max capacity 800 pigeons this was advertised for sale before and deposit received and was asked to keep till y/b racing begins now they have changed their mind and are not going to train other peoples birds as first thought hence back up for sale I can email pictures of trailer to you but do not know how to upload have tried £1000 no offers cost lot more

is it in good nick or is it accident damaged ?

[Guest stb-]

Oh dear dear celtics arses nipping again now RULES ARE RULES well seems uefa have brocken there own rules in making there decision to re instate clatic . The decision is supposed to be given by a 3 man committee going by the RULES but opps it was only taken by one as uefa now saying they didint have tiome to fly the other 2 in before the draw and fast tracked it in clatics favour . UEFA have broken their own rules in a rush to reach a decision last Friday before the draw for the next round was made.

 

It has been claimed technical stipulations were breached including a failure to appoint a three-man committee.

 

But Pinto said: “It is correct that this decision was made by one person but this happens because there is no time to fly people in.

[Blue Chequer Pied]

Oh dear dear celtics arses nipping again now RULES ARE RULES well seems uefa have brocken there own rules in making there decision to re instate clatic . The decision is supposed to be given by a 3 man committee going by the RULES but opps it was only taken by one as uefa now saying they didint have tiome to fly the other 2 in before the draw and fast tracked it in clatics favour . UEFA have broken their own rules in a rush to reach a decision last Friday before the draw for the next round was made.

 

It has been claimed technical stipulations were breached including a failure to appoint a three-man committee.

 

But Pinto said: “It is correct that this decision was made by one person but this happens because there is no time to fly people in.

 

Maybe they can't count either lol

[Guest bigda]

By 2009, 200 people had been arrested by the Polish authorities, including referees, observers, coaches, players as well as some high-ranking officials of the Polish FA.

 

ZagÅ‚Ä™bie Lubin, were relegated from the Polish top flight due to corruption, along with Widzew Åódź who were also charged with corruption and match fixing – but were relegated through poor performances on the park anyway.

 

According to reports in Poland, a total of 75 Polish football clubs have been suspected of match fixing and corruption over the years.

 

Corruption is still rife in the game despite the authorities best efforts.

 

Legia Warsaw may ‘no longer be the friends of Celtic’ but they certainly cannot lecture or dictate what Celtic should do after they simply kept quiet and let UEFA deal with the situation according to their rules.

 

The club asking for Celtic to uphold sporting integrity and doing what is best for the game, not only were found guilty of widespread racist behaviour and hooliganism – but also corruption to fix games in a bid to win the league title.

 

Legia are certainly not a club that should be lecturing anyone about ‘sporting integrity’.

 

 

[Guest stb-]

By 2009, 200 people had been arrested by the Polish authorities, including referees, observers, coaches, players as well as some high-ranking officials of the Polish FA.

 

ZagÅ‚Ä™bie Lubin, were relegated from the Polish top flight due to corruption, along with Widzew Åódź who were also charged with corruption and match fixing – but were relegated through poor performances on the park anyway.

 

According to reports in Poland, a total of 75 Polish football clubs have been suspected of match fixing and corruption over the years.

 

Corruption is still rife in the game despite the authorities best efforts.

 

Legia Warsaw may ‘no longer be the friends of Celtic’ but they certainly cannot lecture or dictate what Celtic should do after they simply kept quiet and let UEFA deal with the situation according to their rules.

 

The club asking for Celtic to uphold sporting integrity and doing what is best for the game, not only were found guilty of widespread racist behaviour and hooliganism – but also corruption to fix games in a bid to win the league title.

 

Legia are certainly not a club that should be lecturing anyone about ‘sporting integrity’.

IRELEVANT POST NOTHING TO DO WITH PRESENT could someoen in admin remove this nonsence .Problems with the figures agasin this is 2014 not 2009