Guest TAMMY_1 Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 TAMMY 1 TAKEN OVER SOON ;D ;D ;D KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH FOOTBALL SO DOES THAT MAKE ME THE PRIME CANDIDATE FOR THE JOB
ALF Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 ALL YE NEED IS A BIG MOOTH TAM ;D THATS WHY YER NO 1 CANDIDATE ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Guest Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 and thats why yir no 2 alf ;D ;D ;D ;D (bring your stb today)
THE FIFER Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 YES UR RIGHT ROSE, THIS IS JUST WHAT IT IS, WHEN MOVING A POST THER IS A SQUARE TO TICK IF U WANT TO LEAVE A GHOST SETTING, THIS HAS NOT BEEN UNTICKED WHEN MOVING SO LEFT THE GHOST SETTING, THAT'S ALL THERE IS NOTHING TO GET INTO.
Guest Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 ALL YE NEED IS A BIG MOOTH TAM ;D THATS WHY YER NO 1 CANDIDATE ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Why be nasty when you can be REALLY nasty instead? ;D No original, but a mate of mine was supposedly nominated as coach for a rugby team? Plan was to take oot his teeth and fit seats??
Webmaster Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 What happened was... Problematic posts are now moved to a 'moderators only' board - a kind of recycle bin, instead of being deleted. When we click to move a post to this board it the forum will try and leave a link to it in the new forum; and of course only the moderators can see the topic once it has been moved to this private message board. The topics get dealt with in this way (moved instead of deleted) now for a number of reasons: - it is then possible for other moderators, and myself to read the problematic topics (if deleted we'd never see the actual posts) - other moderators and myself can then asses if the removal was justified - if there are serious problems with a members post(s) the evidence is still available for me to make any decisions on their membership status - if a topic is actually found to be OK, it can be moved back into the public forum Doing things this way leaves an accountable trail for me to follow if needed. The link left to the new board that the topic has moved to isnt an error, but usually used for if say for instance someone mistakenly posts a '2 pairs of Sootjens for sale' topic on the General Board, it then will be moved to the 'Birds For Sale' board and the link will be left for people to follow from the General Board. (Note: I quite often get messages, 'where has my topic gone' etc.) Any questions, let me know Richard
Guest TAMMY_1 Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 What happened was... Problematic posts are now moved to a 'moderators only' board - a kind of recycle bin, instead of being deleted. When we click to move a post to this board it the forum will try and leave a link to it in the new forum; and of course only the moderators can see the topic once it has been moved to this private message board. The topics get dealt with in this way (moved instead of deleted) now for a number of reasons: - it is then possible for other moderators, and myself to read the problematic topics (if deleted we'd never see the actual posts) - other moderators and myself can then asses if the removal was justified - if there are serious problems with a members post(s) the evidence is still available for me to make any decisions on their membership status - if a topic is actually found to be OK, it can be moved back into the public forum Doing things this way leaves an accountable trail for me to follow if needed. The link left to the new board that the topic has moved to isnt an error, but usually used for if say for instance someone mistakenly posts a '2 pairs of Sootjens for sale' topic on the General Board, it then will be moved to the 'Birds For Sale' board and the link will be left for people to follow from the General Board. (Note: I quite often get messages, 'where has my topic gone' etc.) Any questions, let me know Richard RICHARD ON THE CENSORED THREAD THERE IS A VOTE RUNNING AND IF I GET TEN VOTES I WOULD BE GIVEN THE MODERTORS JOB, I HAVE THE VOTES OF FIFER, BRUNO, HYACINTH AND IF I GET ONE OFF YOU THAT MAKES THE TEN WILL I THEN BE ACCEPTED FOR A MODERATORS POST, OR WILL YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT IT
Guest Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 Any questions, let me know Richard just one richard is tammy the going to be a moderater if he get ten votes ;D ;D ;D
Webmaster Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 I dont think thats the correct procedure to become a moderator ;D ;D
ALF Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 SO HOW DOES 1 GO ABOUT IT THEN RICHARD?? :-/ :-/
Guest TAMMY_1 Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 I dont think thats the correct procedure to become a moderator ;D ;D IS THAT A NO THEN
ALF Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 TAMMY FOR MODERATOR ;D ;D ;D COME ON RICHARD YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO ;) ;)
Guest Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 I dont think thats the correct procedure to become a moderator ;D ;D BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Guest TAMMY_1 Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 I dont think thats the correct procedure to become a moderator ;D ;D LOOK AT THE VOTES I GOT RICHARD , HOW MANY VOTES DID THE OTHER MODERATORS GET
dandydoo Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 Back to me and Alf's post ...how do you ????? Self appointed ? democratic vote? you ( Webmaster) get to pick who is the Rep ...and by yer post you have to be behaved or you'll not get noticed or not represent the right qualities : ( as per your last para on censoring direct quote from Tony C) So Tammy if you have not got the e-mail, you haveny been noticed and :o :oRichard doesny like your qualities :X :X Sooo your no getting to be a prefect ...no even a dinner monitor. How was that the other moderators were selected VOTE FOR TAMMY OR CLOCKIE OR ERR OR EM...... ACH FORGET IT !
dandydoo Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 Naw Alf I still have a nice picture of the Jannie setting up the netball nets, marking the long jump .... then you gave me ....Stalag 17 uurgh ober gruppen fuhrer Tam ...mind you when Mods are deleting each other post :o and others dont know ;D ;D and naebody knows who did it :o well... a tighter more robust regime is needed and |tams Pen ;D ;Dn might be it lets have a democratic hustings with each present,past and aspirational mod/candidate giving it.... vote for me cos .........
square_peg Posted October 29, 2006 Author Report Posted October 29, 2006 TAMMY YOU GET MY VOTE THATS 4 YOUNGSTERS NOW 8) IM GOING TO ASDA NOW AS ALL THE BARGINS ARE THERE AT THIS TIME OF NIGHT WHEN I COME BACK I HOPE TO SEE A NEW THREAD ;D WITH LOTS OF NICE COMMENTS ABOUT ME ON HERE 8) 8) 8) BYE BYE FOR NOW :'( BACK IN A WEE WHILE
Guest TAMMY_1 Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 TAMMY YOU GET MY VOTE THATS 4 YOUNGSTERS NOW 8) IM GOING TO ASDA NOW AS ALL THE BARGINS ARE THERE AT THIS TIME OF NIGHT WHEN I COME BACK I HOPE TO SEE A NEW THREAD ;D WITH LOTS OF NICE COMMENTS ABOUT ME ON HERE 8) 8) 8) BYE BYE FOR NOW :'( BACK IN A WEE WHILE I BELIEVE THATS WHAT YOU DO
ALF Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 I DONT THINK ANY OF US DOUBTED HIM TAMMY : : ;D ;D ;D
dandydoo Posted October 29, 2006 Report Posted October 29, 2006 Plenty Black Puddings ...but no like the Overton, Archie.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now