Kyleakin Lofts Posted January 28, 2018 Report Posted January 28, 2018 World War 2 and LongDistance Racing Pigeons While the history of long distance racing pigeons began many years ago theimpact of the Second World War was such that it almost had to begin again in1944/5. Jules Gallez expressed it this way in the opening to Part 1 of TheHistory of the Belgian Strains “The few pigeons from before 1940 thatsurvived the war, and the few that were produced during the war, areresponsible for the best lofts of the 1945 to 1972 period.†To understand thefull impact of this period requires some study of the war itself.When the German army invaded Poland on 1st September 1939 both Hollandand Belgium, along with many others no doubt, hoped to remain neutral. TheBelgian Government immediately announced its neutrality on 3rd September andlater, on 7th November, a joint public appeal was made by the King of Belgiumand the Queen of the Netherlands calling upon all parties to enter into mediationand end the war. On 10th May 1940 Germany invaded Belgium, the Netherlandsand Luxembourg as part of the Greater Battle of France and whilst the invasionwas resisted this was soon overcome. Just a glimpse at the photograph below,Rotterdam after the terror bombing, will tell you why, the assault was so fast,fierce and powerful that it could not be overcome. The bombing lasted littlemore than 15 minutes but the effects were devastating, fires raged through thetown leaving more than 24,000 homes in ashes. Some 800 people were killedand 80,000 were left homeless. The Germans threatened the same treatment toUtrecht but understandably the Dutch forces capitulated on 15th May, the dayafter the Rotterdam bombing, and Belgium surrendered shortly after on 28thMay. So began several years of occupation. The nature of the occupation that followed was similar in many respects fromcountry to country but while the Governments of both Holland and Belgiumsought exile, as did the Dutch Royal family, the King of Belgium, who hadsurrendered contrary to the advice of his government, remained in Belgiumthroughout the war as a prisoner of the occupying German forces. Germanythen appointed a German Civilian Governor over Holland but Belgium wasruled under a Military regime, unlike France and Denmark who retained theirown Governments acting under the control of the occupying force. The majorityof Jewish citizens were deported to various camps, the history and fate of whichhas been described elsewhere. Life and indeed death for the non Jewishpopulation that remained was little better and in some instances, as we shall see,quite as bad. As is usual in such circumstances some elements of the populationcollaborated with the occupying forces, some actively resisted and others madeof it the best they could. This suggests a clear and simplistic set ofclassifications, reality was of course quite different as hardship, envy, suspicion,betrayal and severe punishments were in abundance. The primary concern of aruthless occupying force is never the health, wealth and welfare of the occupiedpopulation but rather to force it into a submissive state enabling both easier regulation and manipulation. Here it soon became apparent that the occupiedcountries had to assist the German war effort and local companies wereabsorbed into that economy with assets, stock and materials confiscated at will.Initially life for the majority population went on much as before but quitequickly the demands from the fronts brought scarcity to the occupied territories.Many foodstuffs were taken out of the free market and distributed by ration cardat fixed prices. Then as the ration of foodstuffs spread from bread, coffee andtea in June 1940 to milk, meat, cheese, eggs, jam and potatoes in April 1941other common necessities like textiles, shoes and cycle tyres joined the list ofthings that could only be obtained by ration card. The traders had to maintainstrict records with receipts sent to a centralised agency, failure resulting inprohibition from purchasing further supplies. This of course encouraged a blackmarket not only in the products but ration cards as well. The occupying forcetried to eliminate this but hunger and necessity are hard task masters and so itgrew. With a growing demand amongst the population farmers and traders withinitiative and cunning risked life itself at times seeking ways round and throughregulation and scrutiny. Farmers for instance were allowed to keep thoseanimals that had to be put down through injury and so, in Holland, between1940 and 1944 about 44,000 more animals were put down in this way than inpeacetime. The population individually had to tread a very careful path oftenweaving between collaboration and resistance, or at least the appearance of it,just to survive or obtain the best conditions they could for themselves and theirfamilies.Whilst this occupation continued the war itself raged on ebbing and flowingwith attack and counter attack and new fronts opening up extending both thescope of the war itself and the resources required to fight it. None of this madethings any easier for the occupying force or those subjected to it. Times werehard for all but those suffering beneath the oppression found it hardest. As timewent on things only got harder and harder. The black market continued to growand so did the resistance bringing out both the best and the worst in people ascourage and sheer desperation drove people to do things they would notordinarily contemplate while others took the opportunity to exploit those morevulnerable than themselves. It was not until late in 1944 that Belgium wasliberated together with the southern part of Holland. The word liberate makes itsound like an amicable exchange but again reality was different. Liberation onlycame about after fierce fighting particularly around the deep port of Antwerpand its approaches. This delayed the liberating forces that were unable to retakeall of Holland before winter and it was that winter of 1944/5 which broughtsome of the worst conditions to northern Holland. Since the D-days landings, which began on 6th June 1944, things becameincreasingly worse in the occupied part of Holland. This great push from theallied forces placed enormous strains on the defending German troops which inturn placed impossible demands upon the occupied territories. Food andsupplies that might have found its way to the ration system was now diverted tothe troops. As the German forces were beaten back they destroyed roads,bridges and rail links as they went, together with much of the farmland, and thishad a more detrimental effect on the black market than any measures they hadtaken before. The winter itself brought some of the severest weather for manyyears which added to the difficulties for the allied advance but this was nothingcompared to the effect it had upon the Dutch population. Now at the worst oftimes the Germans cut off supplies to Holland almost completely and thepopulation was left to starve. From September 1944 to May 1945 more than22,000 died, in that part of Holland, either directly or indirectly from hungerand it became known for all time as the “Hunger winterâ€. May 1945 finallybrought the hunger and occupation to an end but the hardship was not over asthe battle to rebuild all that had been damaged or destroyed had only just begun. What part did pigeons play in all this?Quite a big part is the short and simple answer. Much has already been writtenabout the use of pigeons in war and while that is not the main theme of thisarticle it is not something that can be entirely ignored. Prior to launching thewar it would seem that Germany had plans to use pigeons. Intelligence sourcessuggested that after coming to power the Nazi party had taken over all thepigeon lofts in Germany and that Himmler, who was apparently a fancierhimself, had introduced the use of pigeons to the Gestapo. It should be nosurprise therefore that soon after the occupation of Holland, Belgium andFrance had begun restrictions upon pigeon fanciers were introduced. On 13thJune 1940 a brief announcement appeared in the Antwerp press that aftermeeting with the military Government individuals were only allowed to keeppigeons if they complied with a brief set of regulations. They were required, asof 12 noon that day, to prepare a detailed list of all the pigeons they owned intriplicate. Two copies were to be handed to their Club or organisation and thenpassed forward to the “government†while the third had to be retained by thefancier and be available for inspection. The rings of any birds killed or that diedhad to be handed in with suitable amendments to the list. Beyond that it wasstrictly forbidden for any racing pigeons to be at liberty or leave. Similarrestrictions were made across all the occupied territories. This was the firstwarning to fanciers, other measures were to follow and punishments forbreaches or non-compliance could be severe. From June 1940 the regulations, and pigeons, in Amsterdam were controlled by aspecial Police Unit “The Pigeon Brigade†and between 1940 and 1942 32,709 pigeonswere so recorded. Despite the risk chances were taken and it is rumoured for instance that duringthis time Lionel Haspeslagh, whose company later became famous in the pigeonworld, started to produce pigeon rings. Innocent enough perhaps but what he isrumoured to have done is make double rings so that one could be fitted to apigeon and the other handed in to the authorities indicating its death. This ruseis alleged to have allowed many fanciers to retain their favourite or championpigeon and keep it safe through these harrowing years. True or not, we reallydon’t know because like many things in this period of time it was notdocumented, spoken of or recorded for fear of discovery and the inevitablepunishment that would follow.Some things were recorded and usually for a clear purpose. The notice banningpigeon keeping in parts of France stated clearly “Publish and displayimmediately†its purpose being quite clear. This sort of notice was usuallypublished in two languages, German and the local language, and as we see herepunishment was always a theme. The message was not always the threat of punishment but sometimesconfirmation that punishment had been carried out. Here, below, a frenchmanhad been shot in his home country as a traitor because he had released a pigeonallegedly to take a message to England. The message for the community wasclear but as there is no record of the evidence in this case we cannot be surewhat his actions really were. Flying your pigeons out could be a dangerousgame. This poster was also published in Jersey, in English, warning off as manyas possible with this same story.Publish and display immediately NOTICE subject the prohibition on holding carrier pigeonsThe Military Commander in France bans the holding of pigeons in the Department of LowerCharente, under Section 14 of The Ordinance on Pigeons of September 20, 1940, published in theOfficial Journal containing the Orders issued by the Military Governor of Occupied FrenchTerritories p.104 para 11.If other birds are kept in lofts, it is forbidden to let them fly.Wild pigeons, that is to say those that breed freely and do not return to lofts at night can continueto remain free.Anyone who violates this order shall be punished according to the Ordinance. La Rochelle, 24th February 1941. The Field Commander.NOTICE:LOUIS BERRIERa resident of ERNEis charged with havingreleased a pigeon witha message for England.He was, therefore, sentencedTO DEATHfor espionage by theCourt Martial andSHOTon the 2nd AugustAugust 3rd 1941 Court Martial These regulations ran across the occupied countries but were implemented bythe local Governing body. In Holland it came under the regulation of the ReichCommissioner for the occupied Dutch territory dated August 3, 1942, and Vol.86, where keeping pigeons was prohibited subject to similar ring registration wehave seen above. In this order we can see more clearly the stipulatedpunishments:“A person who intentionally or by the wrongful acts contrary to one of theseprovisions shall be punished with imprisonment of at least three months butnot exceeding five years, in particularly serious cases, prison sentence of atleast one year but not exceeding fifteen years imposed.â€And also exceptions:“These provisions shall not apply to:1. Pigeons, which the German Wehrmacht used or confiscated;2. Birds, which by the Reich Commissioner for the occupied Dutch territory(Commissioner-General for Finance and Economic Affairs) made anexemption for its exceptional breeding qualities where the exemptionconditions are met;3. Pigeons, which are kept in zoos in such a manner that they cannot fly;4. Ring Neck doves, which are held in separate cages.†The first of these exemptions brings us to another feature of the occupationwhere the Wehrmacht seized, used or confiscated, various pigeons and heldthem in centralised lofts. Again we suffer from a lack of documents or recordsto say just how many pigeon were seized in this way, how many centralisedlofts there were and what exactly was their purpose.The second exemption relates to pigeons chosen for their exceptional breedingqualities and implies that these are different to the pigeons that had been seized.In their excellent history of the Jan Aarden strain, “Jan Aarden en degeschiedenis van de Nederlandse fonduifâ€, the authors Sira Hendriks andMachiel Buijk give quite a detailed account of the seizure of the entire stock ofhotelier Jan Aarden from the lofts at his Hotel which were then housed in theWehrmachtshok, as these centralised lofts were called, in Steenbergen. Theyalso refer to the pigeons of Oomens Brothers being seized in a similar way, andthese were housed in a Wehrmachtshok at Haagdijk 183, Breda, which makesit sound as if exemptions 1 and 2 were much the same.The other development highlighted in this book was that at the time the JanAarden lofts were seized, 14th May 1943, all the other pigeons in Holland, otherthan those in the various Wehrmachtshok, were ordered to be put down. Thismeant that apart from those few pigeons which had been hidden and kept secret,at great risk to the owners, all the remaining pigeons in Holland were in thehands of the occupying force.When the pigeons were putdown rings, feet and featherswere retained and submitted asproof of death. It was then the task of “The Pigeon Brigade†to reconcile these remains with theregistered pigeons to ensure that none survived.Photo courtesy Archiefbank Stadsarchief AmsterdamSlightly different circumstances pertained in Belgium as described by JulesGallez in his book “The History of the Belgian Racing Pigeon†where:“Many fanciers were hit hard by the authorities who required them to taketheir birds to a large building in Vorst-Brusselsâ€.But he goes on to explain a different requirement for some:“Other famous fanciers, such as Oscar Devriendt and Vander Espt, etc, didnot have to take their birds to Vorst but had a German soldier stationed rightat their house. The soldier was in charge of the loft and all pigeons. Theowners couldn’t even go in to their own lofts. Other fanciers who were notsupposed to keep pigeons kept them under cover in hiding places. AloisStichelbaut in Lauwe hid his in his underground air-raid shelter.†Towards the end of the occupation these Centralised lofts became known to theallied forces on an intelligence level as there was concern that they would beused as a “Stay behind pigeon service†when the allied forces advanced. Anentry in a 1944 Irish Guards War Diary lists some of the known centralisedlofts:“Central lofts are known to exist at COLOGNE, FLUSHING, BERG (in theisland of TRIEL) and possibly at PARIS and BRUSSELS which may still beoperating from underground.â€The entry goes on:“Apart from their own birds the Germans have commandeered French,Belgian and Dutch pigeons. The German birds carry rings of the followingtypes:-(a) WBNI plus number (WBNI standing for WEHRMACHT BRIEFTAUBENEIDERLAND)( WBB0 plus an number (WBB0 standing for WEHRMACHTBRIEFTAUBE BELGIEN)The majority of the German birds also carry on their rings the wordWEHRMACHT or WEHRMACHT BRIEFTAUBE.â€On October 4th 1944 all 402 pigeons in the Breda Wehrmachtshok were takenaway by the German forces and once again we can rely on Hendriks and Buijkto tell us what actually happened to the Steenbergen Wehrmachtshok.Apparently, on Monday October 30 1944, as soon as the allies mounted theirattack on Steenbergen Willi Schumaker, the German Officer who had been incharge of the Wehrmachtshok, together with a special army unit gathered up thepigeons and made off for Germany. How far they got and what happenedthereafter we do not know but we do know that before he left Schumaker gaveJan Aarden several pigeons, possibly as a thank you gesture. Aarden andSchumaker had enjoyed a fairly close relationship, perhaps another wartimeaccommodation, where Schumaker needed advise and expertise in order tocarry out his task and Aarden wanted to keep as close an eye on “his†pigeonsas he could. Schumaker also gave a couple of pigeons to the sons of the housethat had been commandeered and used as the Wehrmachtshok. These werequickly sold as the demand for pigeons spiralled with the euphoria of the Page12liberated population as the occupation ended. Another illustration of theurgency of this demand arises from the fact that while Breda was only liberatedby Polish troops on 29th October 1944 just ten days later, on 8th November, Pietde Weerd together with the Oomens brothers set off on their bicycles to visitsome of those more fortunate lofts who had not lost all their pigeons in searchfor stock.During the fighting, as was inevitable, some pigeons escaped and over timesome of these found their way back home. In some places someWehrmachtshok pigeons also became available and of course Germany had notbeen the only army to engage with pigeons. Thousands of pigeons had beenused by the allied forces some on aircraft to be used as “MAYDAYâ€messengers in case of emergency but many more were despatched to theoccupied territories under various clandestine arrangements to send intelligenceback from the resistance and spy networks. Finally, when the occupation wasover, some pigeons became available from other sources, though not always asmany as desired, as Jaap Breeman, a 75 year member of a Dutch pigeon club,recalled: “Immediately after the end of the war birds were available fromEngland. For Nieuwe-Tonge 12 pigeons were available and we had 13members.â€Quite clearly the war had a devastating effect on the people, the land and thepigeons. With the lack of food, hunger and starvation as it was it is surprisingthat any pigeons survived at all but pigeon people can be quite determined andshow great resolve. Once peace arrived, life and normality was graduallyrestored. The pigeon stock also rose and the reputation of Steenbergen and itspigeons rose with it. In the words of Hendriks and Buijk: “The reasonSteenbergens quality outstripped the rest of the country was mainly due to thebirds of the Wehrmacht lofts.†Clearly there was a lot of truth in this as we cansee, within the pedigrees of those days, references to those Wehrmachtshokbirds but also, almost hidden away, is the occasional reference to anothersource, "Engelse Legerduif" or English Army Pigeon, that should not entirelybe forgotten. Nigel Lane
paddymac Posted January 28, 2018 Report Posted January 28, 2018 Some excellent reading in the Jules Gallez series of books "The History of The Belgian Strains"
yeboah Posted January 28, 2018 Report Posted January 28, 2018 Any Talks I give to Probus Clubs or Schools I Emphasise the importance that the racing pigeon ( played for the use of a better word )in securing 30 of the 32 dickens medals in animal terms a VC handed out during the world wars when peregrine falcons were destroyed to allow us to defeat Nazi Germany As with the Poppy LEST WE FORGET
THE FIFER Posted February 1, 2018 Report Posted February 1, 2018 another good one m8, I havent read it all will have to get a cuppa
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now