Roland Posted July 26, 2006 Report Posted July 26, 2006 Never ceases to amaze me how certain things / topics just dry up. Saw a Post where it was alledges that a Convoyer wasn't on site... or the Transporter was, but no one to man it, or was it not there, then again in the same post that there was two with it when one went home and the remaining one had to ask other convoyers to help. Confused! Never a part where it was an actual fact, though some one told some who said that someone said that according to him that told him! Well may I humbly suggest that if this is / was true, then bring it to the appropiate parties tat can sort it out. Then if it is true, apploliges are in order. But to say that it's not actually been proven and to put it upon a public site is I feel irresponcible. Facts first please. what is the open verdict now. that some went the week before to meet up with those that went the week after the race! It beggars belief!
Guest TAMMY_1 Posted July 26, 2006 Report Posted July 26, 2006 I ONLY PUT IT ON THE PUBLIC FORUM ONCE THE MATTER HAD BEEN REPORTED TO THE RPRA AND I KNOW THEY ARE NOW DEALING WITH IT AND I COULD HAVE PUT IT ON WEEKS AGO BUT I WAS WAITING TILL THE INCIDENT HAD BEEN REPORTED I STILL HAVE NOT SEEN ANYTHING OFFICIAL FROM THE BICC DENYING IT
Roland Posted July 26, 2006 Author Report Posted July 26, 2006 Thanks Tammy for filling that in for me. I have of course no comment, as I know not anything, but like many others no doubt I will wait and see just what transpires, or not as the case may be.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now