Mike Lycett Posted October 10, 2006 Report Posted October 10, 2006 Sent our NFC resignation off today.
Guest Posted October 11, 2006 Report Posted October 11, 2006 hehe i'd like to think so Rose but the skin of the NFC committee is thicker than a century-old crocodile ... and collectively I don't think they'll come up with any new initiatives to win back the current batch of resignees like Mike and myself, never mind the 3000 others they have lost in the past ten years.
Guest TAMMY_1 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Posted October 11, 2006 Fine I believe you ... that's why after asking the same questions week in week out, day in and day out one is still asking ... I rest my case. And I believe that Mick is the only one that is conversing on here. As the old 'Proven' saying goes, the proof of cooking is in the eating... seems will are expected to starve. EVERY TIME YOU RESPOND TO SOMETHING ROSE HAS SAID YOU SEEM TO DO IT IN A RATHER SARCASTIC MANNER ANY PARTICULAR REASON FOR THIS OR IS THAT JUST THE WAY YOU ARE?
Roland Posted October 11, 2006 Report Posted October 11, 2006 Possibly, but then again I don't see that as sarcastic. Probably how you read it... I'm certain Rose doesn't think that! Indeed just what is sarcastic about that!
Guest TAMMY_1 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Posted October 11, 2006 IF THIS IS NOT SARCASTIC THEN WHAT IS Fine I believe you ... that's why after asking the same questions week in week out, day in and day out one is still asking ... I rest my case.
rlez Posted October 11, 2006 Report Posted October 11, 2006 no use voting on any nfc ballots the committee over rule them les
johnny11 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Posted October 11, 2006 Les If you can give us a ring later after the match John
Roland Posted October 11, 2006 Report Posted October 11, 2006 IF THIS IS NOT SARCASTIC THEN WHAT IS Fine I believe you ... that's why after asking the same questions week in week out, day in and day out one is still asking ... I rest my case. Fine I believe you ... Nothing sacarstic there then ... So we go forward and point OUT A FACT ... that's why after asking the same questions week in week out, day in and day out one is still asking ... I could say / imply that some were taking the Pee there in Rose (Like many more) - getting nowhere are geting nowhere, and thjat IT has been fruitless asking ... Hence the facts speak differently from one would like and indeed expect, Rose just to name one. Tam It is the art of diplomacy to tell a proud new father he's baby is ugly ... Me I aint the diplomatic, but just .... Ah there we have it... It is because - as I was going to say - I just bluntly spell facts as I see them... Hence why I put either a - or ... instad of and' explainings etc. So it must be the way I write, and if that offends, or is taken as sarcastic, then sorry, but so be it.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now