Well why can't we?!

Roland · October 7, 2008

Well further why is it not pratical to have clubs part of an Amal, then Part of a Combine and ALL part of a National or larger concern nigh EVERY week? ...

Or at least as soon as the distance makes it practical and sensible. I mean ok Sennon Cove @ 39 miles is an idiatic stupidity . But some got some store by it!

But Each Club / Fed could / would soon be part of a Combine etc. and it would mean surely, with the great number of entries, have a vastly more meriteous reason to race, to win. And even in the 'Own little Pools' creedancce would be acheived every wek the same. And sections would also then be more worthwhile attaining.

Ok so those in a more favourable location with A. have a little more competition etc. BUT they would still be doing the goods, and again gain a vast amount more creedance and merit.

Golly wouldn't be hard if only the Secs got tto speak to each over. Soon Fed reps and such. Could well be up and running next year.

Never mind any extra or hard work. It wouldn't entail a lot more that what is happening now.

Costs would be halved at least and EVERY flyer every week nigh would have a chance of achieving a worthwhile mention and Knownability if there is such a word!

As for the farness of sections, Well it would necessarily mean that your fed would ALL be enclosed in the same Amal, or Section. Sections can be quite easierly placed via a oblong square being placed N. West to South East upon a map, reverse for South roads.. Ok a few teething problems. But length instead of the STUPID width could and should be done away with. Corridor flying is mentioned. But more importantly, facing wind.

No needn't change the sections for different Race points... But again, certainly different race points could, and should be at least considered and voted on.

Ok, again in regards voting. Club votes, and these must be discussed and voted democratically at the clubs.

Same all the way up, with 2/3 chosen club members with different objectives to see that the vote is honest and correct. And none of the delegates coming back and saying such as 'Well I know when I left I was to vote... But so and so, or such and such meant it wasn't. blah blah whatever.

Same all the way up. AND further each and every club etc. has a recorded published record of how they did actually vote.

None of this 21/2/3 members counting and declaring as such!

Indeed time it was got on with I reckon.

Indeed why isn't voting as such!