jimmy_bulger Posted May 30, 2009 Report Posted May 30, 2009 BEEN TRYING TO POST THE LAST 5 MINS AND GETTING BLOCKED HAD NO WARNINGS SO WOTS GOING ON JIMMY
jimmy_bulger Posted May 30, 2009 Author Report Posted May 30, 2009 I ONLY WANT MY SAY ON THIS SITE YOU CAN POST ABOUT BAD FANCIERS,BAD COURIERS,BUT IF YOU POST ABOUT BAD CLUBS THEN YOU ARE A LEPAR,AND THIS SITE HAS A DISCLAIMER SAYING THAT ITS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT IS POSTED. JIMMY
jimmy_bulger Posted May 30, 2009 Author Report Posted May 30, 2009 VALLANCE BEEN TRYING TO POST THIS FOR 5 MIN AND GOT SODDED OFD
Guest chrisss Posted May 30, 2009 Report Posted May 30, 2009 your lucky mate i have posted my views on the state of the site [nowdays] it got locked by who and why who knows it was done by "the all knowing"
retired Posted May 30, 2009 Report Posted May 30, 2009 Jimmy There is no reason for that to happen attached to the site i lose my connection more often than not - I told you via PM if i can anwser a question then i will do - I cant promise it will be the response you want but never the less it will be responded to.
jimmy_bulger Posted May 30, 2009 Author Report Posted May 30, 2009 ALL I ASK ON HERE VALLANCE MATE IS A SQUARE DEAL FOR ALL. IF YOU NAME A BAD FANCIER ITS OK. IF YOU NAME A COURRIER ITS OK IF YOU NAME A BAD CLUB. WELL YOU NEED BURNING AT THE STAKE.. JUST PEOPLES OPINIONS . THATS WHAT THIS FORUM WAS SET UP FOR. JIMMY
retired Posted May 30, 2009 Report Posted May 30, 2009 ALL I ASK ON HERE VALLANCE MATE IS A SQUARE DEAL FOR ALL. IF YOU NAME A BAD FANCIER ITS OK. IF YOU NAME A COURRIER ITS OK IF YOU NAME A BAD CLUB. WELL YOU NEED BURNING AT THE STAKE.. JUST PEOPLES OPINIONS . THATS WHAT THIS FORUM WAS SET UP FOR. JIMMY I will take a look at the thread and see why it was locked - There is the possibilty it was locked on request of the original poster and if so it will remain locked. If you have the link to the thread feel free to post it on here or via PM.
green monster Posted May 30, 2009 Report Posted May 30, 2009 hi vallance loft that post i put up on other thread about sites making money from members who click on there site has nothing to do with wot software you are running but more to do with google adds which this site has I'm sorry this is posted in the wrong thread by all means you can delete or remove it or get yellow to do it as its his best job
retired Posted May 30, 2009 Report Posted May 30, 2009 hi vallance loft that post i put up on other thread about sites making money from members who click on there site has nothing to do with wot software you are running but more to do with google adds which this site has I'm sorry this is posted in the wrong thread by all means you can delete or remove it or get yellow to do it as its his best job The google ads only affect the clicks made onto them sites (Placed in the google ad) and not clicks made in the forum.
Guest speckled Posted May 31, 2009 Report Posted May 31, 2009 :X well i can still post :-/ or am i missing the point off ths thread :-/ just wondering speck. :-/
Guest bigda Posted May 31, 2009 Report Posted May 31, 2009 :X well i can still post :-/ or am i missing the point off ths thread :-/ just wondering speck. :-/ there's nothing wrong with your post speck, that i can see looks good ;D
jimmy_bulger Posted May 31, 2009 Author Report Posted May 31, 2009 AM OFF TO BED NOW. WHAT HAS PISSED ME OFF IS THAT YOU CAN ON THIS FORUM ,NAME AND SHAME BAD FANCIERS,YOU CAN NAME AND SHAME BAD COURIERS,YOU CAN EVEN NAME AND SHAME BAD CLUBS :IE: NFC,MNFC,BICC,NWCC, ETC,ETC BUT IF YOU NAME AND SHAME A DOMESTIC CLUB THEN YOU ARE OUT OF ORDER. THIS IS WHERE I HAVE A CONFLICT. NAME AND SHAME EM ALL OR NONE AT ALL. JIMMY
Guest speckled Posted May 31, 2009 Report Posted May 31, 2009 :-/ owwwww sounds as thought ya have something really bad ya wont to name shame :-/ hey there is always the the pigeon mags to do that as well, loads peeps will read them, more than what will on this site humble speck
jimmy_bulger Posted May 31, 2009 Author Report Posted May 31, 2009 SPECK THIS IS OR WAS A SITE SET UP BY A FANCIER FOR THE FANCIERS. AND NO DOUBLE STANDARDS. JIMMY
Guest speckled Posted May 31, 2009 Report Posted May 31, 2009 but we are all fanciers. it how far the elite wont to go :-/ we are all in this sport for the same reason, why for what reason does each one wont to name shame i cant uderstand, and belive me ive been thought the mill named shamed :-/ but it still. dont make me wont to take what others do to the limits of discussing it via forums it seem to me it them becomes personal :X not a nice thought when that happens Speck
Roland Posted May 31, 2009 Report Posted May 31, 2009 You know, over the last 30 years or so, yes much has changed, and believe it, believe it not, I believe that clubs re, and have had to get better - in the main. Many, of the 'Scrihteaps' (the two words are mixed) have left, or packed upped. Those that have remained that are now mostly in the categories of ‘Would be Bad' for the clubs' for the fanciers are A. The 'Name / Cliché brigade' - Though most choose to disregards this as they like to hand on to the' shirt tales, and feel honoured to defend regardless... because they are a 'Name Fancier'. Yes I could name 2 Bad clubs. Yes they do have those disruptive selfish and overbearing members that try to lord it over.... But fortunately other members now do - and have to - override them for the sake of the clubs. So yes I'd agree with Jimmy a club may well be a shyster of a club - used to be the secretary had a lot of bearing, and if he was / is good - or bad, the club reflected this
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now