johno Posted March 30, 2007 Report Posted March 30, 2007 in the event that two organisations agree to accept one and others decisions on suspensions etc what would the legal position be? if one organisation got it seriously wrtong would the other be held accountable also? would the organisations be jointly liable for the consequences? would a new appeal process need to be set up. how would it be possible for one organisation to enforce a suspension without offering the right to appeal? in the event that one organisation run out of funds would the other be held responsible for costs? serious issues here i think.
Ian McKay Posted March 30, 2007 Report Posted March 30, 2007 The decision is final and binding on all parties means only in that organisation. Nobody can take away your democratic right if you wish to persue this in a court of law.
Guest Posted April 1, 2007 Report Posted April 1, 2007 I would caution resorting to Law, and even then only as a last resort. It is a mistake to think the Law covers everything; it doesn't. I broke off a debate with another gent who clearly couldn't tell the difference between 'forms of discrimination' which the Law allows, and 'unlawful discrimination', which it obviously doesn't. A simple visit to the Citizens Advice Bureau could save a lot of grief.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now