Freedom to Reply

[Guest chrisss]

 

And why do you always like to stir chrisss?? yes i unlocked it after a disscussion with mick bowler, and yes i did state he left under mutual consent, as that was the case, and his account was dissabled. He did not leave by his own choice as you put it :-). He cant reply to the accusations, so therefore please leave it :-)

 

i am not stirring [sorry i read this after your pm] i am a bit puzzled by the actions of yourself in this,i had no idea that he had left, you people were saying that he was banned, and it was unfair as he could not reply [a fair point] when i pointed out that he was not banned,[not on this weeks hate list] you then stated that he had left by mutual consent.why not say that right from the start,i do not really care that much now as everyone now knows who it is [allegedly 8) 8) 8)]but if he did not leave by his own choice then where does the mutual consent bit come in?,i am hoping this goes to bed now, as getting into a row with admin/mods/politburo never turns out well as none of you can do no wrong :-/ :-/ :-/ :-/ :-/ and all of this is diverting attention away from the main point of the thread

[Guest youngzimmy]

I DONT KNOW ABOUT FREEDOM TO REPLY BUT TRYING TO GET TO PHONE SHANE FROM INGRAM AND LANGTON IS NEAR IMPOSSIBLE YOU NEED TO BE A FREEMASON OR SUMTHIN TO SPEAK TO HIM I AM REALY FRUSTRATED AS I REALY WANT SOME ADVICE FROM HIM