Guest gladdo Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 who is the admin on here ...ive sent many messages and got no reply still ... who is looking after the web site as there should be always someone watching over the site ..... mikey ....
Guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 who is the admin on here ...ive sent many messages and got no reply still ... who is looking after the web site as there should be always someone watching over the site ..... mikey .... Webmaster, Don't think he does night shift. ??) ;D
Guest chrisss Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 oh there is always someone watching over this site,you just never know who they are ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
maverick Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 put up something oldyellow dont like and he will be there quicker than a flash ask about pigeon basics fund and your thread will be off so someone will be there hiding and watching
OLDYELLOW Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 put up something oldyellow dont like and he will be there quicker than a flash ask about pigeon basics fund and your thread will be off so someone will be there hiding and watching Maverick , the pigeon fund is that for Webmaster to deal with and ill see personaly that ill get some answers from him , post that are likely to get out of hand are locked with an aim to keep the site moving along nicely in a respectfull manner , Richard was away for the weekend and also has a life off Pigeon Basics , as i said previously to you via pm if you have any questions you can ask Richard aka webmaster yourself via pm , as for admin theres only Webmaster as 'THEFIFER' felt he had enough of the distruptive element the site had and needed a break , as it now has settled down he is willing to take his post back which i've urged Richard to do as he also is a trustie of the Pigeon Basics fund but now he doesnt have access to that any longer , with the site owners having outside intrests ( a life ) they are not always available 24 / 7 like some would think they should , they try to deal with many pm's and request as soon as humanly possible , i also have talked with peckedhen and told her i will personly see that her friend is helped , which she was happy with , which is above and beyond my expectations of a global moderator
maverick Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 DISTRUPTIVE POST SO IF YOU ASK A QUESTION ON HERE YOU DONT LIKE IT IS DISTRUPTIVE , RICHARD IS A BIG BOY NOW AND CAN LOOK AFTER HIMSELF, HE DOES NOT NEED YOU A WANNABE LOOKING AFTER HIM. I AM AN HONEST MEMBER ON HERE LOOKING FOR SOME HONEST ANSWERES, AND DONT NEED AN AR-E WIPE LIKE YOU TELLING ME WHAT TO DO OR DONT DO.
OLDYELLOW Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 Maverick yet again your post is disrespectfull , i have not disrespected you by calling you any names any positive ground you have tried to gain has been sadly lost by your last post , Richard is mature enough to deal with things himself but when certain members want answers there and then its quite simply not possible when there not available as they were away , as for a wannabe looking after him im more than sure intellectually he is more than capable of looking after his own issues , then honest disrespectfull member maverick use the pm facility and contact him as its between you and him and im sure he will furnish you the answers you require , go take a long look in the mirror
maverick Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 I can look in the mirror in the morning can you, DISRESPECTFUL I AM NOT, TELL ME HOW MEMBERS ON HERE CAN FIND OUT ABOUT THINGS IF POWER HAPPY YOU KEEPS TAKING POSTS OF OR LOCKS THEM BEFORE THEY CAN BE ANSWERED, ITS LIKE BEING AT A CLUB MEETING AND ONLY A HANDFUL KNOW WHAT THE BALANCE SHEET IS DONT YOU AGREE.
Guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 I can look in the mirror in the morning can you, DISRESPECTFUL I AM NOT, TELL ME HOW MEMBERS ON HERE CAN FIND OUT ABOUT THINGS IF POWER HAPPY YOU KEEPS TAKING POSTS OF OR LOCKS THEM BEFORE THEY CAN BE ANSWERED, ITS LIKE BEING AT A CLUB MEETING AND ONLY A HANDFUL KNOW WHAT THE BALANCE SHEET IS DONT YOU AGREE. frightening, ;D ;D ;D
OLDYELLOW Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 so calling me a wannabe and an ars e wipe is not disrespectfull ? , then i suggest you look at the meaning of the word 'disrespectfull' and then you will clearly see that your post is just that , as any member of the site should be able to know the details of the Pigeon Basics Fund that much i agree and should be more visable , it's Richards site and he runs it as he see's fit and is moderated according to the sites rules , most posts like that of Pecked hen get taken out of contexed and she even told me herself she didnt see the need for the kangaroo court and is more than happy how im dealing with it , if she is not im equaly sure she show her disaproval , so on one hand i agree with you whole heartedly on the other the disrespectfull way you deal with people wont bully people into your way of thinking quite the opposite you get peoples backs up and loose any credabilty you have as a honest respectfull member
OLDYELLOW Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 im sure there is space on the sites banner and between where it says how many pms you have to have a 'Pigeon Basics Fund Total ££££'s' and have it clickable to get an application form
Guest strapper Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 i have pm,d admin a few times without reply and i still wait for some weeks later...but oldyellow has helped me out loads of times and the last thing id call him is an ar-e wipe, maverick if you want answers m8 dont go about it like that,you only alienate yourself m8,im sure your frustrated at no replys(same as i am at times) but to offend someone ,isnt doing you or the site any favours m8. im not sticking up for anyone im just looking at it from both angles...im with you on the subject of not getting answers off the admin at times but also against someone who just disrespects another without cause too. i think oldyellow gave a fair answer to you and it should be richard or gemma you take it up with. try to keep a cool head m8 i know you must be frustrated to hell when they dont reply...i would be the same.
Guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 Can I ask WHY three threads were removed on 28th Feb by the one and only Jimmy White, namely "Wales v France tonight", "Ireland V England" and "Scots still singing". These posts were removed for no apparent reason to my knowledge, and without explanation. I have asked this question many times "WHY ARE POSTS REMOVED WITHOUT AN EXPLANATION FROM THE RESPECTIVE MODERATOR. Why are members treated like school kids. It's like when you are young, being told you 'cant do this' and 'you mustn't do that' without being given an answer. If moderators require respect from the membership then they should earn it and NOT treat people with contempt.
retired Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 As with most forums its nice to be given an explanation when a post is removed but the moderators dont have to give an explanation. When i have had posts removed, more often than not if i ask for the reason in a PM i am given it.
OLDYELLOW Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 Can I ask WHY three threads were removed on 28th Feb by the one and only Jimmy White, namely "Wales v France tonight", "Ireland V England" and "Scots still singing". These posts were removed for no apparent reason to my knowledge, and without explanation. I have asked this question many times "WHY ARE POSTS REMOVED WITHOUT AN EXPLANATION FROM THE RESPECTIVE MODERATOR. Why are members treated like school kids. It's like when you are young, being told you 'cant do this' and 'you mustn't do that' without being given an answer. If moderators require respect from the membership then they should earn it and NOT treat people with contempt. these were removed due to the racial nature or the likelyhood of people been insulted this is a pigeon site after all not a football site as i have no intrest in other sports i only read one comment that was racial but another moderator removed and i respected there decision
retired Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 these were removed due to the racial nature or the likelyhood of people been insulted this is a pigeon site after all not a football site as i have no intrest in other sports i only read one comment that was racial but another moderator removed and i respected there decision Hope it wasnt mine as dont think any were but ?
Guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 As with most forums its nice to be given an explanation when a post is removed but the moderators dont have to give an explanation. When i have had posts removed, more often than not if i ask for the reason in a PM i am given it. Don't you think ALL posters on a given, removed, thread deserve the same explanation as you do Chris, That is if you get a reply to your pm's in good time to be relevant. There must be many members who have posted on a specific thread (and not been disruptive) who sit there scratching there heads and wondering why a post was locked or removed.
retired Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 Don't you think ALL posters on a given, removed, thread deserve the same explanation as you do Chris, That is if you get a reply to your pm's in good time to be relevant. There must be many members who have posted on a specific thread (and not been disruptive) who sit there scratching there heads and wondering why a post was locked or removed. All i am really stating is that the mods dont actually have to give a reason, on most pigeon forums i visit they certainly dont give an explanation or a reply.
OLDYELLOW Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 Don't you think ALL posters on a given, removed, thread deserve the same explanation as you do Chris, That is if you get a reply to your pm's in good time to be relevant. There must be many members who have posted on a specific thread (and not been disruptive) who sit there scratching there heads and wondering why a post was locked or removed. the problem lies there bob for people to attack moderators and if they followed the code of conduct there would be no need to remove / lock threads , just because a thread is locked or removed doesnt mean anyone person is responsible it maybe more than one if its felt that one person has clearly over stepped the mark then they will be issued as a warning , if indeed they wish to ask why thread locked they can ask why and if not in agreement with the reason they can take it up with Richard
stevebelbin Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 The site seems to ran like our government, we have to be so f--king politically correct these days that the days of "free speech" and Great Britain being called "Great" have dissapeared. Vote BNP I say hahaha ;-). We should be called "Do as your Told Britain"
Guest Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 Well in my opinion they should give a reason, and not hide behind given powers. And on most Pigeon Forums of which I am a member of many too, moderation is done in a more understanding manner, including your own site Chris.
retired Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 The site seems to ran like our government, we have to be so f--king politically correct these days that the days of "free speech" and Great Britain being called "Great" have dissapeared. Vote BNP I say hahaha ;-). We should be called "Do as your Told Britain" I think in fact i know that on here we get much more of a say than on nearly every other pigeon related site - take PC for example - They wouldnt let half of this stay on and would most likely ban if it was from the same person or group doing it all the time.
OLDYELLOW Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 Well in my opinion they should give a reason, and not hide behind given powers. And on most Pigeon Forums of which I am a member of many too, moderation is done in a more understanding manner, including your own site Chris. well the forum rules quite clearly state all moderation is final and we all agreed to the same rules when we joined
retired Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 Well in my opinion they should give a reason, and not hide behind given powers. And on most Pigeon Forums of which I am a member of many too, moderation is done in a more understanding manner, including your own site Chris. The only reason there is a difference between mine and here though is - A - we dont have the traffic as this does B - Richard has a strong code of conduct for the mods to follow, which is his choice and right and overal is prob the proper way to do it - On the other hand the Mods on my site dont have such a set of rules to follow they do as they see fit and if they wish to reply they do, if they dont they dont. They have my backing 100% and i would never put a post back up they have removed as i trust their judgement But then the two sites are really uncomparable on any level other than the fact they are both to do with pigeons.
maverick Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 IF mods on here would let members know why threads are locked or taken off instead of hiding or invisable as has happened , good to see fifer back as he was man enough to p.m. you and let you know why things were taken off or locked
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now