Webmaster Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 I had word from a few people that members were asking for a Fund update so here it is, The Fund was conseived at the end of 2006, begining of 2007, and we had our first sale February/March. We had a second sale at around the same time in 2008. ----------- 2007 ----------- Money IN ----------- Auction: £ 3,095.00 Donations: £ 28.19 Breeder/Buyer: £ 200.00 TOTAL: £ 3,323.19 ----------- Money OUT ----------- Recipients of help from the fund: £1,500.00 Advert: £ 120.00 Breeder/Buyer: £200.00 TOTAL: £ 1,820.00 We decided that it wasn't productive to hold onto a large sum of money through to the next year - it would be far better to make a donation and put some money to good use. Therefore a donation of £ 1,003.19 was made to British Pigeon Fanciers Medical Research £ 500.00 was carried forward into 2008. TOTAL OUT: £ 2,823.19 and £ 500.00 carried forward. ----------- 2008 and to present ----------- Money IN ----------- Carried forward: £ 500.00 Auction: £ 3,385.00 Donations towards paypal costs: £ 23.00 Donations: £ 196.46 Donation from the Hartlepool Federation: £ 200.00 TOTAL: £ 4,304.46 ----------- Money OUT ----------- Recipients of help from the fund: £ 3,500.00 Paypal costs: £ 17.45 TOTAL: £ 3,517.45 Which leaves a balance of £ 787.01 in the fund today. There is an advert that is being disputed (£ 250.95), it will be sorted in the coming days - the fault for this being outstanding so long is entirely mine. There is currently one application awaiting a decision. To date the fund has helped in 10 cases, and also as you can see donated over £ 1,000 to Pigeon Lung Research, none of which could have been possible without the support of the members of this forum. Big thanks again to everyone. I hope that clears up some of the questions. I am still struggling with my internet connection, but received the router and setup pack yesterday, just awaiting Talktalk to flick the switch or whatever they do at the phone exchange. So if there are any questions it may be a few days before you receive an answer
Guest peter.j Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 well done richard lets hope it can now be put to bed
pjc Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 Thank you for the update! I hope your internet connection is sorted shortly, so you can keep this site updated as you have been able to do with the F1 site!
Guest MIKE1957 Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 I had word from a few people that members were asking for a Fund update so here it is, The Fund was conseived at the end of 2006, begining of 2007, and we had our first sale February/March. We had a second sale at around the same time in 2008. ----------- 2007 ----------- Money IN ----------- Auction: £ 3,095.00 Donations: £ 28.19 Breeder/Buyer: £ 200.00 TOTAL: £ 3,323.19 ----------- Money OUT ----------- Recipients of help from the fund: £1,500.00 Advert: £ 120.00 Breeder/Buyer: £200.00 TOTAL: £ 1,820.00 We decided that it wasn't productive to hold onto a large sum of money through to the next year - it would be far better to make a donation and put some money to good use. Therefore a donation of £ 1,003.19 was made to British Pigeon Fanciers Medical Research £ 500.00 was carried forward into 2008. TOTAL OUT: £ 2,823.19 and £ 500.00 carried forward. ----------- 2008 and to present ----------- Money IN ----------- Carried forward: £ 500.00 Auction: £ 3,385.00 Donations towards paypal costs: £ 23.00 Donations: £ 196.46 Donation from the Hartlepool Federation: £ 200.00 TOTAL: £ 4,304.46 ----------- Money OUT ----------- Recipients of help from the fund: £ 3,500.00 Paypal costs: £ 17.45 TOTAL: £ 3,517.45 Which leaves a balance of £ 787.01 in the fund today. There is an advert that is being disputed (£ 250.95), it will be sorted in the coming days - the fault for this being outstanding so long is entirely mine. There is currently one application awaiting a decision. To date the fund has helped in 10 cases, and also as you can see donated over £ 1,000 to Pigeon Lung Research, none of which could have been possible without the support of the members of this forum. Big thanks again to everyone. I hope that clears up some of the questions. I am still struggling with my internet connection, but received the router and setup pack yesterday, just awaiting Talktalk to flick the switch or whatever they do at the phone exchange. So if there are any questions it may be a few days before you receive an answer hi webmaster....would it be possible for you to list the Recipients of the fund because just giving totals dont really answer the question
Webmaster Posted August 23, 2009 Author Report Posted August 23, 2009 hi webmaster....would it be possible for you to list the Recipients of the fund because just giving totals dont really answer the question The 10 fanciers are/were; M. Jones, R. Collin, K. Kemp, G. Williams, A. Wight, Mr & Mrs Meredith, C. Davis, D. Amison, S. Cartwright, Thompson Bros.
Guest MIKE1957 Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 The 10 fanciers are/were; M. Jones, R. Collin, K. Kemp, G. Williams, A. Wight, Mr & Mrs Meredith, C. Davis, D. Amison, S. Cartwright, Thompson Bros. thank you for such a quick responce
Guest bigda Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 do you need to be seen as invisible webmaster just in case any one wanted to pm you
gangster Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 WELL I HOPE ITS PUT 2 BED NUTJOBS ALLEGATIONS,BUT IN FAIRNESS YOU COULD SAVED YOURSELF ALL THIS BY POSTING DETAILS UP SOONER RICHARD....
Guest bigda Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 WELL I HOPE ITS PUT 2 BED NUTJOBS ALLEGATIONS,BUT IN FAIRNESS YOU COULD SAVED YOURSELF ALL THIS BY POSTING DETAILS UP SOONER RICHARD.... why do you say it was nut jobs mick, they have explained there concerns, thats all, and well done them, for having the courage to do so if you dont ask you dont find out is that no right :-/
gangster Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 yes you are correct if it was asked in a correct manner but im afraid nutjobs way was not do you not agree....and just 2 add nutjob is 1 man.
superstar Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 yes you are correct if it was asked in a correct manner but im afraid nutjobs way was not do you not agree.... Who is this nut job you refer to Mick?
Guest bigda Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 yes you are correct if it was asked in a correct manner but im afraid nutjobs way was not do you not agree....and just 2 add nutjob is 1 man. never read all the threads to know who your refering to mick, had a look but cant find any thing that applys to nutjobs :-/
superstar Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 Bit personal and out of order for you mick I'm quite shocked by your statement
gangster Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 mark as u know ive no problem with chris and ive always referred 2 him as same, but ive read the posts and i think certain allegations to be a wee bit more than personal he has made ...and for the record i dont claim to be an angel myself
BLACK W F Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 i think not Mark Chris has continually come on here under different handles to cause trouble he is banned end of should stay off
Guest spin cycle Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 i think not Mark Chris has continually come on here under different handles to cause trouble he is banned end of should stay off if this is true...i'm a bit surprised as i thought 'chris' was better than that. i'm afraid i was one that asked for him to be brought back at easter..and i'm sorry to say i may have been wrong. the trouble caused by this fighting over 1 mans opinions was not worth it. thats my modest opinion anyway.
superstar Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 mark as u know ive no problem with chris and ive always referred 2 him as same, but ive read the posts and i think certain allegations to be a wee bit more than personal he has made ...and for the record i dont claim to be an angel myself No worries Mick seems I have taken that the wrong way but still feel the questions asked needed to be answered as did many others, committee members included. It is ok for everyone to jump on Chris's back for doing the asking but I wonder how many of the many people giving Chris the bullets to fire will own up to it and be counted for their own actions on the matter? Saddly none if any I bet!
BLACK W F Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 mark Chris is not a follower he is his own man at times he goes too far
superstar Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 No Chris isn't a follower but there are people that are sugestive and this is red rag to a bull where Chris is concerned and they know it. Fair? Personally think they should have some repercussions themselves simple as that!
BLACK W F Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 well you could have a point there Mark
Guest MIKE1957 Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 well as far as im concerned the question as been answered so the thread should be locked before anymore trouble
THE FIFER Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 lets try and keep this thread on the topic its up for, and any jenuine posts will be ok others will be moved, thanking you for your cooperation,
Guest puresoontjen Posted August 23, 2009 Report Posted August 23, 2009 lets try and keep this thread on the topic its up for, and any jenuine posts will be ok others will be moved, thanking you for your cooperation, it still dont prove any thing do it :X
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now