my point is my sec is keen as mustard all fees including rpra 1s are paid asap..........and yes i feel that she has been stitched up for speaking her mind i never mince words..
even though said stud had these why refuse a test paid for by the fancier himself 2 determine true parentage...im i right in thinking they may have had something 2 hide???
so realistically unless either dna test or single breeding pens its quite feasable that some winners could be not from the sire claimed???.....ive no knowledge of eyes so its not a dig...
i only ask the above as i seem to remember an incident a while back that an american guy was going 2 invest heavy in direct children off champions but the un-named stud refused even though he was willing 2 pay himself....for testing that is..