Just been reading the some of the postings this afternoon, i find ib's comments interesting, he seems to be going to awful lengths to protect this man, not only does he imply that the people collecting this evidence were involved in the alleged assault but he seems to enforce the point that this man has not been cheating. Cheating or not, how can ib be so sure of this unless he knows more than he is letting on or is trying to deflect attention from himself????